In post 1561, Gentleman 5 wrote:Honestly, not really. I just saw that you got G4 to change his thought process.
I havent changed mine, you are way too worried about staying alive. The only townie that should have that mentality is the IC. The rest comes from scum.
News flash.
Town doesn't win unless townies survive. I don't know if this has occurred to you.
You should actually read the posts. I'm not going to go through explaining the entire thing again.
G3-L5 is the worse option for him, L2, 6, and 7 need to be paired first.
I dont control the town, I just know im going to leave my vote on G3-L5 tomorrow if that happens.
You think I can’t solve?
You think I’m playing bad?
Dang man if this slot is getting this much shade I may just replace out so you don’t view me as some sort of easy miss lynch.
I think the only reason you all don’t like me is because my lack of responses and content.
Yet I did say I would be busy.
In post 1569, Lady 4 wrote:Speaking just for myself I've repeatedly criticized your refusal to explain reads and not making sense with several locktowns you arbitrarily picked out of the air, and you've not responded to any of it.
Gent 3’s been open with allot.
(Yep, doesnt mean its town though)
The first Gent to arrive.
(Doesnt mean anything)
His posts seem genuine and in a town’s eyes/prospective.
(Subjective, I think G4 was the one who thinks otherwise; I know someone did)
Before people begin thinking I feel one way or another about Gentleman 3's alignment, I don't believe I've made any post specifically stating either way. I simply said a lot of what he was saying makes sense. I'm not saying this to encourage reads in one direction or another, simply trying to prevent people from altering their reads based on how they think I'm reading Gentleman 3.
Also Lady 5 has made it apparent that discussing with her will be an exercise in futility until she reads and catches up on the game thread - to prevent having to sift through several pages of what might boil down to spam, I'm going to request that players wait until she is reasonably aware of the current state of the game and the positions of the players in it before responding to her, instead duplicating the game thread in responses to her in attempts to get her to understand what she could easily comprehend if she chose to put in the effort herself. I'm not opposed to helping players catch up or to quoting one or two posts in question, but Lady 5 is not aware of a significant amount of information. Thank you.
I'm almost certain that replace out discussion like this both goes against the spirit of the game (at least in my interpretation of the moderator's posts) as well as the spirit of the site-wide rule pertaining to replacing out. Either way, I'm specifically requesting here that you don't discuss it -- simply take the action you deem necessary and be done with the matter.
In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.
What, exactly, would you like me to offer? I'm not reading 60 pages of nonsense pregame.
If you didn't read, how did you propose to L7? How would you have known to?
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Well, follow the implication of if he's scum to it's conclusion. Why L7 over L5 L6 (me) or L1?
I am a firm believer L1 should sit based on this.
L5 is the easy mislynch in this setup.
Then picking between L6 and me, L7 is further from being correct.