I didn't call you a name anymore than you saying I lack awareness for stating the obvious. The last proposed gets to pick who lives and dies. That is the most control, not least.In post 2173, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 6 stop calling people names and just play mafia.
Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Lady 6
-
Lady 6 Goon
- Lady 6
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen byIn post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts thatnotrequesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Saying you aren't exemplifying objective qualities is an effort to get you to fix and repair those qualities (or acquire where lacking) - lack of awareness can be fixed by reading the thread more and trying to approach again. I haven't yet insulted you personally yet, nor said you are something, and everything I've said is pertaining to the game.In post 2175, Lady 6 wrote:
I didn't call you a name anymore than you saying I lack awareness for stating the obvious. The last proposed gets to pick who lives and dies. That is the most control, not least.In post 2173, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 6 stop calling people names and just play mafia.
You calling me a pig and telling me to go die are just you lashing out at me - it serves no productive purpose and it's not relevant to the game. Stop. It's childish and petty.- Lady 6
-
Lady 6 Goon
- Lady 6
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Excuse me? You think I want to be VLA during this time?In post 2176, Lady 2 wrote:
It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen byIn post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts thatnotrequesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.- Gentleman 5
-
Gentleman 5 Goon
- Gentleman 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 873
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Saying the things you do are bad should be triggers to get you to stop doing those things, not reasons for you to just start name calling.
She meant no insult by it.In post 2178, Lady 6 wrote:
Excuse me? You think I want to be VLA during this time?In post 2176, Lady 2 wrote:
It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen byIn post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts thatnotrequesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.- Lady 6
-
Lady 6 Goon
- Lady 6
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
No? I was just explaining why I don't need to arrange an auto-accept from the Moderator (which I had been recommended to do) - because I won't be V/LA. It is completely neutral that you will be V/LA; given that you will be, your best option is to declare an auto-accept.In post 2178, Lady 6 wrote:
Excuse me? You think I want to be VLA during this time?In post 2176, Lady 2 wrote:
It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen byIn post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts thatnotrequesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.- Gentleman 5
-
Gentleman 5 Goon
- Gentleman 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 873
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 5
-
Gentleman 5 Goon
- Gentleman 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 873
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Btw, this is town.In post 2181, Lady 6 wrote:@Gentleman4, I don't know. I have told you to quit being bad and you double down saying I'm bad. Take your own medicine and please be quiet so the last three gentlemen propose.
Scum is not making stupid moves like this.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Why was it bad?In post 2148, Gentleman 5 wrote:Yeah L5 took too long and her hestiance was bad.
I took L4 because I gave up on L5.
And I like ceasar salad- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
good to hear from you again.In post 2186, Gentleman 3 wrote:Oh jesus 20 new pages. I cannot parse this at the present hour.
Please don't have 20 more by the time I wake up
Looking forward to your choice tomorrow.- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I disagree.In post 2184, Gentleman 5 wrote:
Btw, this is town.In post 2181, Lady 6 wrote:@Gentleman4, I don't know. I have told you to quit being bad and you double down saying I'm bad. Take your own medicine and please be quiet so the last three gentlemen propose.
Scum is not making stupid moves like this.
Throwing shade on the most townist player/pair other then confirm Town player isn’t a bad move for scum.- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Like think.
As scum would you want a town leading or would you want to try and lead yourself?
My point being is that if Lady 6 is Scum. They are definitely trying to get rid of the most non confirmed Townist pair.
Which if done correctly, could make a Scum the strongest town leader and able to lead scum to victory.
So by no means is doing as such making them not scum as I believe they scum read G4 (I could be wrong but I believe this is the case)- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I haven't read everything yet, just skipped around. Will still read tomorrow but L5 I would like it if you gave a brief summary, in context, of what led you to this:
because I'm currently leaning toward asking L6.In post 2101, Lady 5 wrote:@Gent 3 Don’t pair with Lady 6. Choose either Lady 2 or me.- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Because of the interaction between Lady 6 and Lady 1.In post 2194, Gentleman 3 wrote:I haven't read everything yet, just skipped around. Will still read tomorrow but L5 I would like it if you gave a brief summary, in context, of what led you to this:
because I'm currently leaning toward asking L6.In post 2101, Lady 5 wrote:@Gent 3 Don’t pair with Lady 6. Choose either Lady 2 or me.
It is a similar interaction between Gent 5 and Gent 6 which could cost Town the game especially if they are all stubborn enough to Thunder dome themselves.
And as I stated before, if we want to avoid constant miss Lynch we need to remove any major interaction that could make them occur.
Let’s say I accepted Gent 5’s offer and Lady 4 is in my position.
I would still say the same thing.
I would still say either Lady 1 or Lady 6 needs to go.
Yes sure may some people view me as a PL.
But do I have any interactions that can cost Town the game? No
Do I spam and not care about the game? No
Do I focus on one certain target and refuse to consider anyone else? No, as 3 scum still are present in this game
Do I try to talk with people and give my reads? Yes, even if it seems like I don’t from my inactivity in the past
Do I game Solve? Absolutely!
Do I play like garbage? Sometimes, but I’m going to try and avoid that now.- Lady 5
-
Lady 5 Goon
- Lady 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 915
- Joined: October 29, 2019
@Gent 3In post 2196, Gentleman 3 wrote:If G5 and G6 are TvS it's no great mystery which is which. - Lady 5
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Lady 5
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Lady 5
- Gentleman 3
- Lady 5
- Lady 5
- Lady 5
- Lady 5
- Lady 5
- Lady 5
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 5
- Gentleman 5
- Lady 2
- Lady 6
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 5
- Lady 6
- Gentleman 4
- Lady 2
- Lady 6