In post 62, Wimpy wrote: In post 57, Datisi wrote:Game specific site rule 2.: Do not bring outside influences into the game - this includes threats, bribes, wagers, promises, "trust tells", alliances, etc.
Using knowledge from previous games is perfectly acceptable
, but try not to carry grudges from one game to another.
Like call me scummy for it i don't give a shit but don't call me a cheater.
I did call you scummy for it.
This isn’t a cogent point. It’s being evasive — not “oh yeah my bad I thought you were bending the rules and and that that was a scum motivated action” but instead just trying to respond to half the statement
In post 65, Wimpy wrote:The more datsi posts the better I feel about my vote. It’s like he doesn’t like the attention and he doesn’t know how to handle it.
Tries to cite this as an example for how he explained why datisi is scummy despite not being comfortable with attention being NAI (and I disagree that it’s true)
In post 72, Wimpy wrote:
I’ve explained my thoughts. Why are you asking a redundant question?
So wimpy explained his thoughts but not in a way that explained why he was making a serious vote on page 2 for dats. When pushed on the logic he makes up something about her play being against the rules, when he gets closed on that he’s evasive.
He’s generally over defensive in response to being pushed, and his explanations don’t make sense.