Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]

[Gentleman 6]

And no, fuck you G5.

[Gentleman 4]

You're allowed to tell yourself what you want as much as you want.

However, you did just recently voice support for Gentleman 8 and Lady 5, so I highly recommend voting for them.

[Gentleman 4]

Although, I think I've heard little girls with better arguments for why they're getting a horse for christmas than yours.

[Gentleman 6]

G4, you actually scum then?

[Gentleman 5]

And no, fuck you G5.

K.

Good list besides that I guess

[Gentleman 5]

G4, you actually scum then?

G6 is shading, get him L5

[Gentleman 6]

My approach has successfully been used by town in at least one past iteration of the setup.

Literally all that poking me on this issue requires me to do is make my identity more obvious than it already is and doesn't change the actual approach to the game.

If you need to go after me because you're scum and I'm not planning to take you to endgame, go after me on something besides the mechanics of it because you know that the correctness of the mechanics tbhat I've put forth can't actually be argued with.

[Gentleman 5]

If the scumteam is G4/G5/G6 can we get a scummy nom plz

[Gentleman 3]

Is there a scummie for "most toxicity caused in order to win a game"?

[Gentleman 6]

Is there a scummie for "most toxicity caused in order to win a game"?

I don't think that I've been toxic this game.

[Gentleman 3]

You haven't been too bad but if the G5/G6 interactions were theater that'd be pretty dirty.

[Gentleman 4]

Gentleman 6, would you be willing to provide verbal input on who you think is and is not scum, based on process?

[Gentleman 4]

I'm really not interested in your lists of what does and does not contain scum, they contradict each other. If you want to discuss my process, that's fine, I've provided a sample of it, or if you'd share some of your own that would also be productive.

[Gentleman 5]

Is there a scummie for "most toxicity caused in order to win a game"?

I don't think that I've been toxic this game.

And no, fuck you G5.

Lol i love this game.

Fuck it so much

[Gentleman 4]

Alright here's the couples I'm considering for today in no particular order:

Lady 5 and Gentleman 8:

Spoiler: I've already covered this, and I think it's a dead horse now, but here's my argument in case you missed it:

I still support a Lady 5 and Gentleman 8 lynch, because it will help me sort Lady 2 and Gentleman 3, it will remove a lot of the spam from the thread, I doubt they will make it much later anyways, neither of them will surprise me with a scum flip, and I think we can get enough agreement on it to get two lynches before intermission.

One point I specifically want to bring up about this pairing is this: a lot of people are having difficulty with too many town reads - Lady 4's reads list included not enough scum and Gentleman 6 recently expressed doubt in several of his scum reads, and this is often indicative of scum being in the lurker pile -> Gentleman 8.

Gentleman 5 and Lady 4: The case against Gentleman 5 is debatable. I've liked what he brought to the table in the past, but Gentleman 1 made a solid point about his Lady 2 "joke." I'm really not certain about this pair, I'd really rather have more time to sort through this, because I've been very much on the fence about both these player's alignments. I think based on Gentleman 5's "joke," flipping this pair might be indicative of Lady 2 scum.

Gentleman 3 and Lady 6: Lady 6 has said very convenient things at convenient times before, and several of her more interesting posts have been noted several times by other players. I will go through these when I get the chance, but I think she's slid significantly under the radar due to her absence. There have been a couple things she's done that have barely any game relevancy but can be indicative of her being town on her main account, though, so this is something to keep in consideration. I have never been a fan of Gentleman 3's posting, it all looks particularly fake and his activity has dropped conveniently after finding a partner - right around the same time everyone else was looking at Gentleman 5 and Lady 4.

Gentleman 1 and Lady 2: Not really a pairing I was considering at the beginning of the day, I like Gentleman 1 for the most part, but Lady 2's flip could help determine the alignment of several other players here and I've been less and less convinced by her posting recently.

This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.

[Gentleman 4]

From anyone, to be honest. I'm not really interested in considering any other lynches at the moment.

[Gentleman 6]

G1/L2 is who I want to lynch right now because I think Star Wolf is scum.

[Gentleman 5]

Remind me of this joke?

[Gentleman 4]

Can you talk quote specifically what posts Gentleman 1 made that made you uncomfortable? Or give me the page numbers at least? I want to be able to interpret for myself.

[Gentleman 6]

I suppose that I can.

[Lady 4]

This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.

I am exactly zero interested in lynching lady 2 for unflipped associatives.

[Gentleman 6]

It's not L2 that I scumread.

[Gentleman 5]

This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.

I am exactly zero interested in lynching lady 2 for unflipped associatives.

If L5 flips scum can you be convinced?

[Lady 4]

I am willing to read a G1 case.

[Lady 4]

This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.

I am exactly zero interested in lynching lady 2 for unflipped associatives.

If L5 flips scum can you be convinced?

Someone would need to explain why to me again.