Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4
- Lady 4
-
Lady 4 Goon
- Lady 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 405
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I don't think G8's weird ask has anything to do with your alignment. If he's scum, he was either genuinely paying no attention and didnt care, or his buddies told him to keep L5 in the game to increase apathy. You could easily have ended up left out by this move as his buddy. If anything, I think if he were scum with you he'd have waited for G1 to make a move.In post 3323, Lady 2 wrote:How do you see it, L4?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think you were pretty widely scumread, or at least people were leaning scum on you. I think the players who thought you were pretty townie were people like Gentleman 6 and Lady 5.In post 3333, Gentleman 3 wrote:Like literally you are the one who was ambiguous in that post, I was struggling to parse you, and you weren't helping. (I don't think you were even right as I was neither widely townread nor widely scumread at that time.)- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
How would town be likely to respond to that question?In post 3336, Gentleman 4 wrote:I meant to write what I did at the top of the post. The mushrooms comment looked particularly out of place - like someone was trying to escape a particularly uncomfortable situation.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think you'd be more interested in solving the issue at hand and worrying about pizza later.In post 3339, Gentleman 3 wrote:
How would town be likely to respond to that question?In post 3336, Gentleman 4 wrote:I meant to write what I did at the top of the post. The mushrooms comment looked particularly out of place - like someone was trying to escape a particularly uncomfortable situation.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It's a post that took literally two seconds, what are you even talking aboutIn post 3341, Gentleman 4 wrote:I think you'd be more interested in solving the issue at hand and worrying about pizza later.- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Are you trying to deny the situation you were in at that point was uncomfortable for you?In post 3343, Gentleman 3 wrote:Like that's just pure confbias. My options were ignore, mock, or answer; I picked the one that wasn't rude, and you're saying I was trying to "escape an uncomfortable situation?" Give me a break.
Your dismissive language isn't helping your case, at least FMPOV.- Gentleman 5
-
Gentleman 5 Goon
- Gentleman 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 873
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 5
-
Gentleman 5 Goon
- Gentleman 5
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 873
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I hope you mean L5?In post 3342, Gentleman 4 wrote:Also Gentleman 3 has a strange attachment to Lady 4 and I'm not particularly sure why.
Because this Im pretty sure is not true?- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think it's pretty clear in that post I'm struggling to understand you, and also pretty clear that I thought you meant I was a universal townread but I didn't believe that.In post 3340, Gentleman 4 wrote:I think the point of my post is that you thinking people townread you doesn't make sense based on your own perceptions of the way people treat you, and yet you still remark that you think people are town reading you. Does that not seem strange?- Gentleman 4
-
Gentleman 4 Goon
- Gentleman 4
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 690
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Maybe this is just me, but it definitely looked to me like Gentleman 3 was a pretty reasonable scum read for most of pre-dance, I thought the votes on you were for lack of directness in your read, but I might be wrong.In post 3346, Gentleman 5 wrote:When did G3 become “widely scumread?”
Didnt L2 and G3 literally vote me yesterday for shading G3 yesterday? Wasnt he a favorable read for most of the predance or am I wrong? - Gentleman 4
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 5
- Gentleman 5
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4
- Lady 4
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 4
- Gentleman 4