Edge cases...In post 2296, Luca Blight wrote:Also, could it be possible rb targeted Flubs N1 and scum’s kill was blocked again?
I mean it's just as possible Flubber is actually scum vig who made a second shot N1, and one of them was blocked.
Edge cases...In post 2296, Luca Blight wrote:Also, could it be possible rb targeted Flubs N1 and scum’s kill was blocked again?
I mean Flubs is a scum PGO and rb targeted him (which is likely) which means rb would be killed as a result.In post 2298, Sirfetchd wrote:Uhhh maybe. Flub is still scum for lying in a mass claim in that situation.In post 2296, Luca Blight wrote:I think Flubs has to be the lynch today now, he’s obviously never being NK.
Also, could it be possible rb targeted Flubs N1 and scum’s kill was blocked again?
I think Flubs as scum likely chooses pgo over vig given his play style. I know if I were a pr I’d have probably targeted him N1 as well, because he’s the sort of player that’s hard to read.In post 2300, Something_Smart wrote:Edge cases...In post 2296, Luca Blight wrote:Also, could it be possible rb targeted Flubs N1 and scum’s kill was blocked again?
I mean it's just as possible Flubber is actually scum vig who made a second shot N1, and one of them was blocked.
@ wooper i'm maybe seeing what you're seeing with adorable hereIn post 2252, Adorable wrote:I also support a mass claim and I think we can figure out which claim is scum and which is town. I have a theory but I don't want to say it if we don't mass claim because I get the feeling scum will jinx my theory. Btw, I have been v/la since I replaced in and I didn't think it would matter if I didn't activate v/la since I'm still able to log in.
let's go in order plzIn post 2253, Luca Blight wrote:I'm leaning towards lynching Flubs before Frost, but I think we need a mass-claim to progress here.
I don't mind going first - I'm VT.
this is is a p scummy claimIn post 2270, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm not going to be able to fully catch up in time so I am just going to claim.
I went for the 1-shot PGO. My thought was in getting first pick I was going to be a prime target for scum to kill, so if I timed it right I could knock off a scum without sacrificing a more powerful role as an early kill. There was a time a while ago where I was getting NK'd early because games wouldn't go anywhere and I was able to look town enough make for a good target. I tried tapping into it but because I've been so lax in more recent times it threw people off and basically failed.
I tried at the very beginning of the game to slip as though I picked governor since that's something scum would want to get out of the way early, but by the end of D1 I sat in everyone's null pile so as far as I was concerned that was a failure. I still have my shot.
claim your role and then first and second pickIn post 2279, Sujimichi wrote:I'm confused as to what I should do when it is my turn.
i feel like if he's a town pgo he's played this kinda wrongIn post 2281, Sirfetchd wrote:Flubb, I've never known you to be an obv town kind of player. Especially with your level of activity in this game. Like ok fine, I can accept not taking cop bc you might be targeted mechanically if town, but there's also JK, JOAT, Doc that are high power slots that can be devestating in the hands of scum.
I feel you are missing a lot of the paranoia I would expect. If the slots behind you are all scum then you have handed them power while they are probably able to work out with some amount of decency and the entire thing fails. If you don't obv town it fails.
Right now it looks like you have picked a role that can ensure multiple town deaths.
i think this is a p fringe case scneario and probably isn't something that needs to be considered seriouslyIn post 2296, Luca Blight wrote:Also, could it be possible rb targeted Flubs N1 and scum’s kill was blocked again?
that's actually what a50 did last iteration of this setup; he purposefully picked pgo and lolhammered to bait town investigativesIn post 2302, Luca Blight wrote:I think Flubs as scum likely chooses pgo over vig given his play style. I know if I were a pr I’d have probably targeted him N1 as well, because he’s the sort of player that’s hard to read.In post 2300, Something_Smart wrote:Edge cases...In post 2296, Luca Blight wrote:Also, could it be possible rb targeted Flubs N1 and scum’s kill was blocked again?
I mean it's just as possible Flubber is actually scum vig who made a second shot N1, and one of them was blocked.
I don't really think the burden of proof is on me. The benefit of massclaim to scum is obvious-- they learn who the PR"s are. The benefit to town is not obvious, and I'm not convinced that there is enough of a benefit, and nobody advocating for massclaim has convinced me of that. This is way earlier than when massclaims are normally done.In post 2307, skitter30 wrote:ss i dont' entirely understand why you're opposing massclaim rn
In post 2299, Adorable wrote:Flub's Pgo claim looks like a scum claim. I would expect a town Pgo to play towny and Flub's play hasn't been towny. On day 1 he did not explain his vote on Kerset and he joins a bandwagon which looked like he wanted to prevent Billy from getting more votes and being the lynch target. On day 2 when he voted nom all he says is he is the 4th vote and on post #1742 he says nom is very blatantly scum that couldn't figure out how to transition from getting through D1 to having to start thinking about their motivations onward. I didn't understand what he meant by that and nom flipped town. His whole play has just been making town pr want to visit him and this is how a scum Pgo will kill a town pr.