In post 716, Saudade wrote:I retracted that read please read the game,In post 691, alimdia wrote:Specifically Saudade, you said if wake is scum then so is Looker.
In that case, what about the other way around?
the read was based on the assumption that Looker was at L-1 and wake didnt hammer him, but wake was already on the wagon.
In post 561, Saudade wrote:Pretty sure he had le hammer at a pointIn post 559, alimdia wrote:bro he was on the wagon he can't hammerIn post 554, Saudade wrote:The person who claimed hes hammering whoever gets to l1 first, then doesnt hammer him.
Its because its his scum buddy
You never acknowledged that he didn't have the hammer whole of day 1.In post 562, Saudade wrote:Anyways wake is scum here regardless of what ya'll be saying
Hes completely out of the game in a typical scum way to be
No. See:In post 715, Saudade wrote:we should be no lynching today.... ~_~
In post 699, alimdia wrote:Finally, if another night kill is prevented, then that means an extra lynch.In post 683, alimdia wrote:Not when there's basically almost confirmed town...In post 672, Saudade wrote:Mathematically its optimal.
So....
Mathematically it's only optimal to no-lynch at MYLO with0 confirmed town
Neither of which is true.