I will get to your isolated content later today most likely but specific when is “early”?In post 4446, Lady 9 wrote:No I said I was taking a hard look at 7-7 early
I wanted 3-6 to go to endgame, I thought I made this clear?
Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
?In post 4449, Gentleman 1 wrote:but I think L9 does not look to good for that push because it seems to be trying to open up our pair as a mislynch.
What? The only pairs alive at the time are your pair, my pair, and lady 5/gent 8. And I know I'm town. What am I supposed to argue?- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Will you be on at deadline if needed?In post 4451, Gentleman 1 wrote:Anyway, going to have to go back to my day soon.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Early in this dance phase, when 5 pairs were aliveIn post 4450, Gentleman 1 wrote:
I will get to your isolated content later today most likely but specific when is “early”?In post 4446, Lady 9 wrote:No I said I was taking a hard look at 7-7 early
I wanted 3-6 to go to endgame, I thought I made this clear?
I quoted some posts at the end of the last page- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 2162, Gentleman 2 wrote:
I concur.In post 2161, Lady 3 wrote:Okay everylady except lady 2 has turned on auto invite and lady 2 should def turn on auto invite
reading consensus: Gentleman picks should be
3 picks his lady first
1 picks his lady next
8 picks the lady at the end
This is very much worth looking at
Gent 8 jumped out of line to pair here, he didn't want to pair with l2.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 2532, Gentleman 8 wrote:In post 2530, Gentleman 5 wrote:
Why did you pick L5 over 2 or 1?In post 2528, Gentleman 8 wrote:In post 2475, Lady 3 wrote:Gent 8 you've been keeping up with the game?No, not really. I'm rather struggling to care about you loud-mouthed people at all. Your desire to begin dancing before the dance starts frankly baffles me. I don't consider the pre-dance festivities to be of much worth whatsoever. If I am paired with a bad dancer, I will leave. If not, I shall stay. In this sense, it matters not a whit with whom I am paired, and the desire of you youngsters to try and solve this in the pre-dance smacks of rank hubris.
Good day.I like the number five, as I liked the number seven.
In seriousness, I have not, as has been noted, been following. I selected a number more or less entirely at random from the list of eligible bachelorettes.
Again, I feel the choice of partner is entirely superfluous, and that it is hubris to attempt to solve much of anything before partners are decided.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I was very inactive at the time, as was g2.In post 4463, Lady 2 wrote:using pairing logic there's no reason you/g2 shouldn't have died during the intermission :c- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
u:In post 4470, Lady 2 wrote:you're casing scum motivation in g8, who is flipped scum- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
He got away with it for l5In post 4470, Lady 2 wrote:i don't think he could have gotten away with that regardless of my alignment...?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
i still don't understand your clear on g1 and your agenda against me is completely unbelievable
there's like, a universe where this argument is t/t but i think town!l9 actually evaluates that at some point..? doubling down on doubling down like this is a mislynch agenda
i appreciate that if she's town, she needs to lynch this pair - but i *had* anxieties about g1. i don't dislike his iso and the main read i have there is sheeping the former l2's rundown of the game. just l9's conduct since my replacein is so clearly positioning i'm here like :// - Lady 2
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Lady 9
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 9
- Lady 2
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 2
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 2
- Lady 9
- Lady 2
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 2
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Gentleman 1