Mini 2106 - Magia Record Fate Weave Semi-U-Pick (OVER!)

[Sujimichi]

I can't argue with your opinion.

And, yes, I have stated where I agree with others. This is true. Consistently is not an adverb that is accurate, however.

[Gamma Emerald]

VOTE: Alchemist21

More content please.

If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.

If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?

I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.

I’m right here buddy.

I’m still waiting for you to answer this.

A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.

B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.

oh alright...

just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy

The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.

And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.

Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.

If that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?

The comment on the RVS vote was me disagreeing with your point on multiple level. I don’t think game choice is connected to play style, and defensiveness is not always scummy.
Is that all, it feels like you have more you want to talk about.

[Sujimichi]

The above post was direct toward Gamma Emerald.

[Severa]

townreading

Severa
Bitmap
Sujimichi
Alchemist21
Gamma emerald maybe

[Alchemist21]

VOTE: Alchemist21

More content please.

If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.

If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?

I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.

I’m right here buddy.

I’m still waiting for you to answer this.

A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.

B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.

oh alright...

just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy

The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.

And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.

Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.

If that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?

The comment on the RVS vote was me disagreeing with your point on multiple level. I don’t think game choice is connected to play style, and defensiveness is not always scummy.
Is that all, it feels like you have more you want to talk about.

Why did you feel a need to disagree with it? Did you think any part of my post was serious?

[Evenstar]

So far I’m only sure on Townreading Severa and Salamence. Severa’s main is someone I’ve played with a lot and I’m fairly confident this is their Town play. Regardless of whether Salamance’s claim is real or not, I don’t think scum would cave so easily to a fake guilty on them so I townread them for the response.

You’re the first one to reach out to me so you’re a bit Towny too.

Gamma’s the closes thing to a scumread I have right now but it’s not definite.

What do you think is your most non-consensus read atm?

[Evenstar]

townreading

Severa
Bitmap
Sujimichi
Alchemist21
Gamma emerald maybe

Talk to me about Sujimichi and Bitmap.

[Alchemist21]

So far I’m only sure on Townreading Severa and Salamence. Severa’s main is someone I’ve played with a lot and I’m fairly confident this is their Town play. Regardless of whether Salamance’s claim is real or not, I don’t think scum would cave so easily to a fake guilty on them so I townread them for the response.

You’re the first one to reach out to me so you’re a bit Towny too.

Gamma’s the closes thing to a scumread I have right now but it’s not definite.

What do you think is your most non-consensus read atm?

Probably Gamma. I know other people are looking at them, but not for the same reasons I am.

[Severa]

If Nancy doesn't start playing soon I'm going to rip her fucking head off with my bare hands.

[Severa]

In-game, of course.

[Gamma Emerald]

VOTE: Alchemist21

More content please.

If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.

If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?

I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.

I’m right here buddy.

I’m still waiting for you to answer this.

A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.

B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.

oh alright...

just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy

The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.

And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.

Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.

If that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?

While we’re at it you can explain what scum motivation you thought was in 254

254 came across as a double discredit to me. You discredit his belief that sheeping is scummy by telling him to explain and then strawmanning his argument by saying the votes that would follow would also be sheep and need to be voted by that logic, which is not true imo. You also discredit any wagon led by him on you by creating the implication that the wagon would be dishonest via an assumed hypocrisy.

[Severa]

I think that people are tonally scumreading Sujimichi (who posts in a way that is liable to be tonally scumread) without considering the merits of what she posts and if you focus purely on what she says she's towny.

[Gamma Emerald]

How the hell do you “need more information” on your top scumread? That plus voting someone above the null line is super suspect.

null line is exactly halfway through the players

draw your own conclusions

Are you saying your list was bs

[Evenstar]

How the hell do you “need more information” on your top scumread? That plus voting someone above the null line is super suspect.

null line is exactly halfway through the players

draw your own conclusions

Are you saying your list was bs

that's certainly a conclusion you can draw

[Gamma Emerald]

I can't argue with your opinion.

And, yes, I have stated where I agree with others. This is true. Consistently is not an adverb that is accurate, however.

I think it’s fair to say you have been agreeing with others a lot. Yes, you’ve raised points yourself but it seems like you’re more than happy to sit behind someone and cheerlead them. I think the Boonism for that action is warlocking? It comes across as scummy because you’re trying to promote the idea without taking as much responsibility. I know scum do this because I did it myself subconsciously once when I was starting out.

[Alchemist21]

VOTE: Alchemist21

More content please.

If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.

If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?

I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.

I’m right here buddy.

I’m still waiting for you to answer this.

A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.

B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.

oh alright...

just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy

The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.

And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.

Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.

If that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?

While we’re at it you can explain what scum motivation you thought was in 254

254 came across as a double discredit to me. You discredit his belief that sheeping is scummy by telling him to explain and then strawmanning his argument by saying the votes that would follow would also be sheep and need to be voted by that logic, which is not true imo. You also discredit any wagon led by him on you by creating the implication that the wagon would be dishonest via an assumed hypocrisy.

You are correct that it was a discredit, and that’s because we disagree on whether sheeping is scummy. This isn’t the first game I’ve been accused of being scum just because I followed consensus. It’s not an accurate tell, and I’m not even much of a sheep; I just agree with what I agree with, and agreeing with people doesn’t make someone scum.

[Gamma Emerald]

VOTE: Alchemist21

More content please.

If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.

If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?

I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.

I’m right here buddy.

I’m still waiting for you to answer this.

A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.

B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.

oh alright...

just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy

The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.

And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.

Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.

If that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?

The comment on the RVS vote was me disagreeing with your point on multiple level. I don’t think game choice is connected to play style, and defensiveness is not always scummy.
Is that all, it feels like you have more you want to talk about.

Why did you feel a need to disagree with it? Did you think any part of my post was serious?

It could have been serious but my post wasn’t 100% serious either
Like if I was really going to go after that do you think I just say “reeeeeach”?

[Kerset]

townreading

Severa
Bitmap
Sujimichi
Alchemist21
Gamma emerald maybe

That's almost my scumread list. Could you remove bitmap?

[Alchemist21]

I can't argue with your opinion.

And, yes, I have stated where I agree with others. This is true. Consistently is not an adverb that is accurate, however.

I think it’s fair to say you have been agreeing with others a lot. Yes, you’ve raised points yourself but it seems like you’re more than happy to sit behind someone and cheerlead them. I think the Boonism for that action is warlocking? It comes across as scummy because you’re trying to promote the idea without taking as much responsibility. I know scum do this because I did it myself subconsciously once when I was starting out.

I’ll say it again - agreeing with consensus doesn’t make someone scum.

[Gamma Emerald]

VOTE: Alchemist21

More content please.

If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.

If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?

I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.

I’m right here buddy.

I’m still waiting for you to answer this.

A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.

B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.

oh alright...

just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy

The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.

And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.

Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.

If that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?

While we’re at it you can explain what scum motivation you thought was in 254

254 came across as a double discredit to me. You discredit his belief that sheeping is scummy by telling him to explain and then strawmanning his argument by saying the votes that would follow would also be sheep and need to be voted by that logic, which is not true imo. You also discredit any wagon led by him on you by creating the implication that the wagon would be dishonest via an assumed hypocrisy.

You are correct that it was a discredit, and that’s because we disagree on whether sheeping is scummy. This isn’t the first game I’ve been accused of being scum just because I followed consensus. It’s not an accurate tell, and I’m not even much of a sheep; I just agree with what I agree with, and agreeing with people doesn’t make someone scum.

Eh this kinda makes sense but the fact there’s so much I find wrong in that small post is not a good sign

[Alchemist21]

VOTE: Alchemist21

More content please.

If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.

If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?

I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.

I’m right here buddy.

I’m still waiting for you to answer this.

A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.

B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.

oh alright...

just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy

The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.

And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.

Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.

If that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?

The comment on the RVS vote was me disagreeing with your point on multiple level. I don’t think game choice is connected to play style, and defensiveness is not always scummy.
Is that all, it feels like you have more you want to talk about.

Why did you feel a need to disagree with it? Did you think any part of my post was serious?

It could have been serious but my post wasn’t 100% serious either
Like if I was really going to go after that do you think I just say “reeeeeach”?

I didn’t know how to take your post, and when that’s the only post about me and suddenly you’re saying I was Towny, it’s a little confusing.

[Severa]

It is extremely typical for me to correctly townread all the lynchbaity town slots in a playerlist while everyone is sitting around going "UHH THOSE ARE THE SCUMMY SLOTS THO"

[Farkran]

I think alchemist is town now.

@gamma don't forget my question

3 am, need to get some sleep now

[Kerset]

If you act like scum and townread yourself. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Severa]

I mean, I'm town. I'm not spectacularly concerned about being scumread. In the end the game will townread me because I'm killing scum, not because of the way I post.