Large Normal 223 | New Beginnings | GAME OVER

Hectic · Post Post #5300 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:08 am

In post 5281, texcat wrote:
In post 5181, texcat wrote:VOTE: Garmr

I am also willing to lynch Hectic and Hopkirk. This is based, in part, on the fact that scum missed the blatant Benedict Arnold crumb from the traitor.

I am never voting Rick, Carca, Titus, or Aaron.
Still willing to vote Garmr Hectic or Hopkirk. Rick made a dreadful hammer after a horrible vote by Aaron, but both remain on my don't lynch today list. Carca and Titus remain on my never lynch list.

Why are you never lynching Titus, and unlikely to lynch Aaron?

bob3141 · Post Post #5301 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:13 am

VOTE: Hectic

Hectic · Post Post #5302 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:34 am

In post 5301, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: Hectic

Why??

Titus · Post Post #5303 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:03 am

Ok, why the hell are we not lynching Garmr aka Mr. I forgot?

Garmr · Post Post #5304 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:08 am

In post 5303, Titus wrote:Ok, why the hell are we not lynching Garmr aka Mr. I forgot?

Because I'm town and scum know I would beat you in a 1v1 so they want to avoid it.

Hectic · Post Post #5305 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:14 am

In post 5303, Titus wrote:Ok, why the hell are we not lynching Garmr aka Mr. I forgot?

^^^^^^

It's LyLo but whatever, considering town!Bob's already voted for me:
VOTE: Garmr

Titus · Post Post #5306 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:26 am

In post 5304, Garmr wrote:
In post 5303, Titus wrote:Ok, why the hell are we not lynching Garmr aka Mr. I forgot?
Because I'm town and scum know I would beat you in a 1v1 so they want to avoid it.

So you think Bob is scum?

Hopkirk · Post Post #5307 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:39 am

(Titus/Texcat/AFF/Hectic) are the 'let's lynch Garmr block. I still have a townread on Garmr. None of them have addressed the main reason I've given for this despite me mentioning it at least twice to Hectic yesterday.
@Titus@Texcat@AFF@Hectic

Why does Garmr actually make that claim. It's such a bad fakeclaim for scum to make for so many reasons at that time.

All of them are pushing for him despite how much the rest of that block is pushing for him- despite the fact I think I'm the only non confirmed town who doesn't want to lynch Garmr. @Hectic especially: why did AFF/Texcat want to lynch Garmr yesterday so badly?

I want to lynch (Titus/Tex/Aff) today then have a look at Hectic before making the final decision. That's almost definitely the scumteam though.

Hopkirk · Post Post #5308 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:41 am

In post 5224, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 5223, Hopkirk wrote:Tex: Wants to vote Hectic/Hopkirk/Garmr
AFF: Wants to vote Garmr/Hectic/Hopkirk (from what I can tell). Voted Titus with no explanation then quickly recanted it.

Hm
Tex: Wants to vote Hectic/Hopkirk/Garmr
AFF: Wants to vote Garmr/Hectic/Hopkirk (from what I can tell). Voted Titus with no explanation then quickly recanted it.
Titus: Wants to vote Garmr. Does not want to lynch Eevee. Shading me.

Only outlier here is Eevee
Eevee: Wants to lynch Tex/AFF/Garmr/Titus. Has said one of us is probably bad.

Pretty solid reason to lynch Tex/Aaron today and tomorrow here and this is why I want to leave Hectic for today. I want time to check whether they actually push Hectic at all.

Hectic I know pushes them, but as like 3rd choices. Only wants to lynch Tex after lynching me for example. Would need to look more carefully there.

Hopkirk · Post Post #5309 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:43 am

Though tbh if there's no hammer on Garmr then I no longer care about lynch order as it's (Titus/Hectic) from lack of hammer and (Tex/Aaron) from obviousness.

Hectic · Post Post #5310 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:56 am

Hop, scum can make bad plays. Garmr's been erratic the whole game so you're giving him too much credit using the "it makes no sense to claim that" argument.

Was AaronFF pushing Garmr yesterday? I know Texcat was but I put that down as bussing. Scum has to bus each other a little at this point because of how many confirms there.

I really dislike how Hop is just assuming Titus and I are scum if Garmr doesn't get hammered, and not even considering scum!Garmr.
Also, he literally made an argument against me yesterday saying scum are unlikely to coordinate quickhammers with these kind of numbers, when I suggested we shouldn't be voting since it could be LyLo, so the fact he's now switched on that opinion for his own convenience to push his agenda is very scummy.

Hectic · Post Post #5311 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:56 am

Lynch Garmr or Hop, I beg of you.

Hopkirk · Post Post #5312 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 4:41 am

L5 when i think there's 4 scum- scum can't coordinate a quickhammer

L3 with 3 scum - possible

If the wagon builds up to L2 and there's no QH then that's when I switch to 100% on you/Titus as opposed to 90%

You agreed AFF was pushing Garmr I believe.

texcat · Post Post #5313 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:17 am

In post 5286, Titus wrote:Texcat, why am I on your never lynch list?

VOTE: Garmr

Because I think you are town. You agree with me about Garmr.

texcat · Post Post #5314 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:21 am

In post 5307, Hopkirk wrote:(Titus/Texcat/AFF/Hectic) are the 'let's lynch Garmr block. I still have a townread on Garmr. None of them have addressed the main reason I've given for this despite me mentioning it at least twice to Hectic yesterday.
@Titus@Texcat@AFF@Hectic

Why does Garmr actually make that claim. It's such a bad fakeclaim for scum to make for so many reasons at that time.

All of them are pushing for him despite how much the rest of that block is pushing for him- despite the fact I think I'm the only non confirmed town who doesn't want to lynch Garmr. @Hectic especially: why did AFF/Texcat want to lynch Garmr yesterday so badly?

I want to lynch (Titus/Tex/Aff) today then have a look at Hectic before making the final decision. That's almost definitely the scumteam though.

I don't think it's a bad fake claim at all. It was a good, safe, early fake claim. Garmr was just unlucky that Carca was ascetic.

On the other hand, I think it was a terrible town claim if Garmr is actually town.

Carcalilly · Post Post #5315 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:14 am

In post 5296, Hectic wrote:Well, I'm back at Garmr + Hopkirk + AaronFF + Texcat.

In post 5283, Carcalilly wrote:Oh wait, my bad, that was about hectic.

Speaking of which, I'd like to vote them, but could scum to a quick rollout?
Why do you think you've kept alive the past couple of days, Carcalilly?

I feel like it was deeply intentional with the way they killed Gamma night 1, but why I have no fuckin clue.
Only way I can think of is that I'm always wrong in my reads or something, or I've been trusting them.

Carcalilly · Post Post #5316 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:16 am

In post 5298, Hectic wrote:
In post 5283, Carcalilly wrote:Oh wait, my bad, that was about hectic.

Speaking of which, I'd like to vote them, but could scum to a quick rollout?
Hop said your vote was on me. Speaking of, do you still townread him? He's pushed lynches onto two townies the past two days. And he said it himself, he doesn't like to bus as scun.

Yes but everything that hopkirk is doing is super oversteppy which, if he was scum, would be way riskier then it's worth. Getting lynches wrong is something town can do too.
Moreso, hop will show himself scum in the plethora of posts made.

Carcalilly · Post Post #5317 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:17 am

man I can't choose between Titus and Garmr, can we not do that today?

bob3141 · Post Post #5318 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:44 am

no the lynch list for today is hopkirk, hectic or aaron. (still undecided on titsu, texcat and garmr)

We lose or we hit the nail on the head and get the correct solve

bob3141 · Post Post #5319 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:45 am

hectic was given choice between aaron and eve.

He choose eve over arraon.

Aaron is last player without a confirmed alignment on that first wagon. And joined elentas wagon real scummly

bob3141 · Post Post #5320 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:45 am

opkirk and hectic had been hard town reading each other. But as soon as they get poe all of sudden they start scum reading each other

bob3141 · Post Post #5321 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:46 am

hectic jumps on eve wagon and trys to justify beign on it by saying scum can afford to bus

AaronFrost · Post Post #5322 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 7:02 am

In post 5310, Hectic wrote:Was AaronFF pushing Garmr yesterday? I know Texcat was but I put that down as bussing. Scum has to bus each other a little at this point because of how many confirms there.

I wanted either Garmr or Titus yesterday for two reasons.

1) I think there's exactly one scum in there. I seriously doubt they are scum together and either one of them flipping town seriously incriminates the other (Garmr flipping town especially incriminates Titus in this case).

2) I was correct about us not being in lylo yesterday meaning we could've afforded the mislynch. Either way we went we'd have gotten one scum out of the deal and could solve based on that.

I switched to Eevee because I thought she was scum regardless of Garmr/Titus.

AaronFrost · Post Post #5323 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 7:07 am

In post 5319, bob3141 wrote:hectic was given choice between aaron and eve.

He choose eve over arraon.

Aaron is last player without a confirmed alignment on that first wagon. And joined elentas wagon real scummly

What exactly makes you think that scum was on the Elements wagon? I actually think it's more likely that scum stayed off of it for the towncred considering the speed that it built up.

Hectic · Post Post #5324 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 7:17 am

In post 5321, bob3141 wrote:hectic jumps on eve wagon and trys to justify beign on it by saying scum can afford to bus

I think you need to read back yesterday. I didn't want to vote Eevee and was very unsure about it till the end. Hop was the one who convinced me to stay on it rather than continue pushing Garmr.