Mini Normal 2109 | Newbie Quotes II: Newb Boogaloo (Day 3)

rb · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:18 pm

In post 148, Kcdaspot wrote:I don't wanna :p

well, i'm happy to lynch you as well then

Dolly Parton · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:19 pm

In post 142, rb wrote:VOTE: Invisibility

slip is enough for a day1 lynch

off we go

We gotta do what this man right here says:

VOTE: Invisibility

rb · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:19 pm

In post 146, Kcdaspot wrote:Joey is full stop town.

not really, no

his current postings are very doable as scum

Dolly Parton · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:21 pm

The wonderful thing about slips
Is slips are wonderful things!
Their tops are made out of rubber
Their bottoms are made out of springs!

rb · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:21 pm

the only reliable read on joey is that he's capable of identifying things that aren't logically consistent

this isn't an alignment tell, it's a player tell

if you're analytical, you're analytical and you can ask pertinent questions and be brazen about it as either alignment

Dolly Parton · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:23 pm

In post 126, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
19, 20, and 20 all vote vote SausasaurusRex. While this doesn't seem like us, to lynch someone is 7. Those 3 votes got to about 1/2 the lynching point. I don't trust those 3 people (rb, eth0s, & Dolly Parton (Dolly Python))

24 calls the wagon out. While I don't think it would've actually lynch SausasaurusRex, if Rex wasn't Mafia aligned (Since we don't have a FUCKEN ROLELIST) then I would definitely suspect any additional votes on the wagon. I wish we could've seen any additional votes, and decrease the PoE to a few people.

33 is weird. Why would Wake88 want to waste such a wondrous day? (Hey, that alliterated!) I think that this is a suspicious post here, and I'll pay attention to Wake88 more.

I'll just put it here, but Kcdaspot hasn't put much content up to 44. I hope to see content from you later.

Invisible votes me for inactivity, but doesn't seem to respond much to 46. Why?

Kcdaspot comes out with 52. No explanation, just "eth0s is town." This might be TMI, but so blatant and so..
something
... that it went mainly un-noticed.
Rex does notice it and responds in 54.
Kcdaspot replies in 57 with "Interaction with alim".
Then the subject is dropped. WTF? You don't explain what exactly with the interaction spewed them as town. That post is really weird. I don't like Kcdaspot here.

63 seems to be a light push against me for voting invisible. This seems like TMI, while WKIng Invisi.

69 says that my vote is bad because reasons that they don't explain. I repeat, they don't explain their reason. While it might be "I know I'm town, so it's a bad vote" that is LAMIST thinking.
72 is when he says that he's trying to forward the game. Is my vote not forwarding the game? Hm.

96 is a vote on me from eth0s. They didn't explain it, they just said that they liked the wagon.
99 is also a vote on me from Kcdaspot. At least they explained it.

101 This post is contradictory. "First, we have time. Second, we don't have time but we have analysis." Why not just use that analysis to.. analyze other players to find the scum instead of lynching a suspected scum? I don't understand your logic here.
116 is just a "We have time post." Well which is it?

122 seems like TMI.
123 is more TMI.
124 calls out the TMI bullshit that was 122&123
125 denies 124 calling out their bullshit.

Overall, my reads are:

Town

Jake
Alimdia
SausasaurusRex
rb (NULL)
Arkias
Lil Uzi Vert
Rabid Schnauzer (NULL)
Dolly Parton
Joey_
Wake88
Invisibility
Kcdaspot
eth0s

Scum

Do we have to click on the numbers or just take his word for it?

rb · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:25 pm

we can always just lynch him

but i also think you should provide something better than sheeping me on invisibility while simultaneously doing the current easiest and most obvious thing in the game: talking about jake being annoying/playing poorly

Dolly Parton · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:26 pm

In post 156, rb wrote:we can always just lynch him

but i also think you should provide something better than sheeping me on invisibility while simultaneously doing the current easiest and most obvious thing in the game: talking about jake being annoying/playing poorly

But isn't that where we are at right now?

Top 2 current items:

Jake's scumminess vs. Invis's slip

Dolly Parton · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:27 pm

I'd prefer to go after Invis first.

rb · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:27 pm

we lynch dolly on day2

Dolly Parton · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:28 pm

In post 159, rb wrote:we lynch dolly on day2

Well hell suga, get it over with today if you think I'm scum.

rb · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:30 pm

VOTE: Dolly

Dolly Parton · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:31 pm

I'm a mason with wake..

Please unvote.

rb · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:33 pm

wake, confirm/deny?

investigative roles target these 2 if both claim mason

Wake1 · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:34 pm

In post 162, Dolly Parton wrote:I'm a mason with wake..

Please unvote.

Like Hell you are.

Dolly Parton · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:34 pm

In post 163, rb wrote:wake, confirm/deny?

investigative roles target these 2 if both claim mason

Do you really think I would risk such a claim as scum with 1 vote on the border of RVS/real voting?

Dolly Parton · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:35 pm

In post 164, Wake1 wrote:
In post 162, Dolly Parton wrote:I'm a mason with wake..

Please unvote.
Like Hell you are.

Well, I think this def puts wake as obvtown.

Dolly Parton · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:36 pm

Would have been cooler if you had rode this out with me though.

rb · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:40 pm

cool, more dolly votes now

SausasaurusRex · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:40 pm

In post 135, Joey_ wrote:
In post 30, SausasaurusRex wrote:
In post 28, Dolly Parton wrote:
In post 27, SausasaurusRex wrote:I ... didn’t expect this reaction. This is my first non-newbie game, and the first time I’ve participated in RVS. I was under the assumption you can bite anyone, and nothing is taken seriously in this stage. It appears I was wrong.

UNVOTE:
Well tell us... Is you a newbie scummy or a newbie towny? You're answer is always 100% right or wrong here... Choose wisely.
Town. It doesn’t matter to make this known, because the scum know everyone’s alignments anyway, unless there’s a third party in this game.
why would you answer if it doesn't matter

What I meant by “it doesn’t matter”, was that scum won’t have any more chance of nking me if I say I’m town. The scum already know I’m town, so I don’t lose anything by admitting it. Therefore, it’s safe to admit my towniness. Also, if I hadn’t answered, I would’ve looked extremely scummy, which isn’t a good look for town.

In post 134, Joey_ wrote:
In post 46, SausasaurusRex wrote:Lil Uzi Vert hasn’t posted yet either.
VOTE: Lil Uzi Vert
Same q to you, why would you vote someone who hasn't posted?

To apply some pressure to them.

rb · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:41 pm

hey sausa

vote dolly with me =]

alimdia · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:41 pm

Glad people agreed with me about the slip

VOTE: Invis

alimdia · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:42 pm

Why dolly?

rb · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:42 pm

fakeclaim, unverified

im happy with either invis or dolly

SausasaurusRex · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:43 pm

In post 167, Dolly Parton wrote:Would have been cooler if you had rode this out with me though.

This heavily implies Dolly was lying. Why would Wake need to ride it out if she’d been telling the truth?

VOTE: Dolly Parton

I don’t like Invis’s slip either though. Perhaps a D2 lynch if the Dolly one doesn’t work.