You asked me how I played as scum and I said I naturally distance. It doesn't matter if my partner is widely TR or not, I like to distance anyway.In post 2699, Wickedestjr wrote:Luca what did you think of this idea:In post 2695, Wickedestjr wrote:One could make the argument that scum wouldn't want to throw shade at their partner if their partner is a widely accepted TR. If you and Ico were partners, then you two were already popular town reads through most of days 1-2 so the town cred gained from distancing might not be worth the risk of attracting unwanted attention to each other.
Yes you eventually voted to lynch Icon, but I get the feeling it wasn't until the very end that you actually started to SR him. You seemed to think it was me/Datisi for at least half of the day.In post 2699, Wickedestjr wrote:I know that night-kill analysis always needs to be taken with a grain of salt. In general, I just don't believe that scum teams go for the unexpected/wifomy kill as often as people think they do.In post 2696, Luca Blight wrote:I hate WIFOM speculation, but that's exactly what you're doing by putting so much emphasis on the night kills. You thought it was me/Datisi yesterday based on night-kills, that's now been proven wrong but still you persist with this theory. Can't you judge me and emps by our actual play this game?
It feels like you're starting to get impatient with me again. My reads have never been based purely on night-kills. I didn't think it was you/Datisi very long (seeing as I voted to lynch Ico yesterday). And half of our conversation tonight has been based on your actual play this game.
Why would me/Icon not kill Datisi? Icon/emps makes more sense as I said given it aligns with the doc claim and Datisi was protective of emps until LYLO.
Furthermore, who has more reason to kill Datisi last night, scum!me or scum!emps?