Thanks, great to be here. I’ll catch up over the weekend.
Oh you big flirt!
Thanks, great to be here. I’ll catch up over the weekend.
Oh you big flirt!
Fine. I have implied you were voting to apply pressure after you noticed your questions weren't being answered. I think your unvote of Gyro kind of bothered me more so I'm still evaluating your voting pattern and reads to confirm you're applying pressure as town. Right now I feel there are more suspicious slots so I'm comfortable lumping you in the town basket at the moment.In post 241, Farren wrote:How do you judge my interactions with Arthur, given how you've said you'd handle this as scum?
Fair enough, valid explanation, I suppose I should have asked you about reads in general and not only townreads. But you did update your townreads, despite it being after I'd already asked the question, so I appreciate that.Farren wrote: Dodging the question how? You asked if I had any townreads. I gave you the townreads I had. This is a bad accusation.
If you don't find my answer to be satisfactory, that's what follow-up questions are for. You didn't ask any here. Why?
There's more information since post 100, yes, but none of that information led to new townreads at the time. Specifically:
Your question was at post 180.
Players active between posts 100 and 180:
PenguinPower (townread)
Gyro (didn't townread, got banned)
chazary (didn't townread)
Ph0enix (townread, but noted that I was continuing to work on the read)
CheekyTeeky (townread)
ArthurConyl (didn't townread)
ETL (didn't townread)
The more interesting stuff as far as my townreads go occurred after post 180:
Mitillos's entrance (183 / 197) - modified read on the Gyro / Mitillos slot from scummy to Town.
ETL's response in 186 - some iffy stuff, but some good stuff too. Tentative Town, pending the re-read of Cheeky.
Cheeky's response in 229 - notably increased likelihood of one scum between Cheeky / ETL.
Given the explanation Farren gave above, I'm moving him to possible Town, based on all the other information about him, now that that's sorted out. As for Penguin:CheekyTeeky wrote:Would you mind elaborating on your penguin read?In post 230, Ph0enix wrote:Possible Town: Mitillos, Cheeky, PP
Unknown: ESL, Nomanssky101
Possible scum: Farren, Arthur, Chazary
It's still the same, basically. It's not a lot, I know, and it's subject to change after I read the whole discussion between ETL and PP.In post 180, Ph0enix wrote: PP and Cheeky are fine, both are being responsive and give fair explanations of their actions (although I'm waiting for Cheeky to explain the townread on chazary).
Oh no, it's not player-related. I'm just not a fan of them during RVS, I don't believe they do a good job in providing people with information, and in our case, considering we're in a Newbie game, some players who are less experienced and are at the receiving end of a wagon may panic and slip up because of that, regardless of alignment, which, considering the ratio between Town and Mafia players, is not in Town's favor.Farren wrote:Why do you want to avoid starting wagons? Or is it something specific about not wanting to start a wagon on chazary specifically?In post 230, Ph0enix wrote:Then, later, I voted Chazary because by that point votes actually had done a pretty solid job of making people talk. So I voted him in order to get him involved in the conversation. However, my vote on Chazary was followed by a completely random vote on Arthur, followed by a completely random vote on PP (both by Chazary, but still). This made me think whether my vote could actually help me learn something this time. Unlike the situation in the first posts with the first couple of votes, this was no longer the case, a simple vote wasn't going to cut it.So I decided to unvote Chazary in order to avoid starting some kind of wagon as with Gyro. Also, I'm really curious as do when do you think Cheeky "questioned me" prior to me unvoting Chazary.
Also to explain why I voted for Chazary, I initally was voting for ETL but I saw we weren't getting anywhere, so I switched to Chazary. I wasn't trying to lynch anyone, I just switched so there'd be a better chance of getting a read out of someone.In post 210, ArthurConyl wrote:It looks like Mitillos and Darren want to lynch Chazary. It looks like a coupla other guys (including me) want to lynch ETL. While I think both of them are suspect, we should agree on one person, the most suspect person, to lynch. I think some good points have been made about Chazary. I want to hear more from him. VOTE: ChazaryIn post 208, Farren wrote:VOTE: chazary
Imagine this vote in a bikini. Can't have it being charged with indecent exposure or something. Or maybe a strategically placed cloud passing by in just the right spots.
So I'll assume my response was unsatisfactory and you still suspect me. Quite interesting.In post 256, ArthurConyl wrote:@Ph0enix please note that I wasn't trying to prove you were scum but I was just giving an explanation for suspecting you. Farren asked me if I had any reads and asked me why I thought Ph0enix was suspect. I just explained my reasoning to him. I don't think you're scummier than ETL and Chazary.
I like this, it explains a fair bit about the hesitancy I read in your play.In post 254, Ph0enix wrote:some players who are less experienced and are at the receiving end of a wagon may panic and slip up because of that, regardless of alignment, which, considering the ratio between Town and Mafia players, is not in Town's favor.
Given the fact that your sole argument against her had to do with a RVS vote, what did you think your vote was going to accomplish? Also, I still miss what was the actual reason you voted Chazary (unless it was a RVS vote, which would be questionable, considering we were out of RVS by that point, imo). Please quote the post if I've missed it, and explain if not.In post 257, ArthurConyl wrote:Also to explain why I voted for Chazary, I initally was voting for ETL but I saw we weren't getting anywhere, so I switched to Chazary. I wasn't trying to lynch anyone, I just switched so there'd be a better chance of getting a read out of someone.In post 210, ArthurConyl wrote:It looks like Mitillos and Darren want to lynch Chazary. It looks like a coupla other guys (including me) want to lynch ETL. While I think both of them are suspect, we should agree on one person, the most suspect person, to lynch. I think some good points have been made about Chazary. I want to hear more from him. VOTE: ChazaryIn post 208, Farren wrote:VOTE: chazary
Imagine this vote in a bikini. Can't have it being charged with indecent exposure or something. Or maybe a strategically placed cloud passing by in just the right spots.
How the fuck is t unfounded when I SHOWED EXCATLY WHAT POSTS GAVE ME THAT IMPRESSION? Like who the hell are you to tell me what I’m seeing isn’t there? What are you even saying? Like where are you pulling this garbage from? Are you just making it up to sound like you’re involved and doing town things?In post 258, Ph0enix wrote:Something's really bugging me when it comes to ETL. Unfounded accusation of PP, followed by what is to me an unfounded accusation of Cheeky as well, makes me want to put him in "possible scum" territory.
You realize this doesn’t make any sense, right? If I provided evidence to support my read, how the fuck is it “grasping at straws”?In post 233, chazary wrote:with so much evidence. Seems like grasping at straws.
On re-read: yup, 221 covers initial scumread ... then tonal change triggering read change. Thanks; sorry for missing it.In post 249, CheekyTeeky wrote:Post 221In post 239, Farren wrote:223 reminded me ... Cheeky, did you ever get around to explaining what you were thinking on this, and the scumread you had prior to this?
My style of pressure tends to involve lots of questions, with those questions relaxing as I townread people, or sharpening as I scumread them.In post 252, CheekyTeeky wrote:Fine. I have implied you were voting to apply pressure after you noticed your questions weren't being answered. I think your unvote of Gyro kind of bothered me more so I'm still evaluating your voting pattern and reads to confirm you're applying pressure as town. Right now I feel there are more suspicious slots so I'm comfortable lumping you in the town basket at the moment.In post 241, Farren wrote:How do you judge my interactions with Arthur, given how you've said you'd handle this as scum?
Astute point.In post 254, Ph0enix wrote:Oh no, it's not player-related. I'm just not a fan of them during RVS, I don't believe they do a good job in providing people with information, and in our case, considering we're in a Newbie game, some players who are less experienced and are at the receiving end of a wagon may panic and slip up because of that, regardless of alignment, which, considering the ratio between Town and Mafia players, is not in Town's favor.
I feel like you're reading a different game. I engaged you by voting you in retaliation to your unexplained vote. You started it therefore you are the hypocrite for accusing me of not engaging. Give me one question you have directed at me that has not been answered?In post 264, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Cheeky, you have not engaged me at all either so do not even try thathypocritial bullshit. I have asked plenty of questions for you to respond to, you have yet to explain anything I’ve brought up except to try to spin it into a case against me. How about taking responsibility for the actions that gave me the impressions I had in the first place? It’s a dodging technique and it’s not towny at all.
LOL I don't even know who you are and am not threatened by this mystery person tunnelling me.In post 268, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I’m your biggest threat. So of course you’re going to try to misrep everything I say instead of explaining why I’m wrong.