Newbie 1976 - Game Over

Datisi · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:11 pm

Your vote and reasoning strike me as opportunistic.

Btw, I actually

had

been loosely following a couple of games you happened to play in as they were happening. Unfortunately I don't remember much about your play at all.

Datisi · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:11 pm

Huh, why is them being buddies the first thing to come to mind for you?

Naerys · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:15 pm

Perhaps they are trying distancing.

Map Wolf · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:17 pm

In post 43, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Were you really not serious? It’s not just that btw, you started the day off making excuses. I usually take that as a bad omen.

I wasn't making an excuse. I was apologizing for forgetting about the start and thus entering the game later.

In post 50, Datisi wrote:Your vote and reasoning strike me as opportunistic.

Btw, I actually
had
been loosely following a couple of games you happened to play in as they were happening. Unfortunately I don't remember much about your play at all.

I don't really find the vote that opportunistic. It's more that the reasoning is bad. I mean, I could literally copy past your statement

Your vote and reasoning strike me as opportunistic.

and the same logic would apply but to your post.

Xtoxm · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:24 pm

VC 1.1

[3] GayBabyJailor:

Kanna, Saladman27, Map Wolf

[1] Map Wolf:

NorwegianboyEE

[1] NorwegianboyEE:

Datisi

[4] Not Voting:

Naerys, Dev321, JacksonVirgo, GayBabyJailor

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch

The Day 1 deadline is in

: (expired on 2020-01-07 07:39:44)

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:24 pm

In post 49, Naerys wrote:
In post 48, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Daitsi, you’ve never seen my townplay before. So how can you be so sure already?
for all we know you might be scum partner of MapWolf and trying to stage something scummy

You sound very newbtown.
I don’t think scum you could fake type of not remotely correct but still genuine speculation.

Kanna · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:25 pm

In post 43, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Were you really not serious? It’s not just that btw, you started the day off making excuses. I usually take that as a bad omen.

Yeah, don't agree with that push but don't like this post in particular. The "I actually had other reasons for scumreading you," feels off. VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:25 pm

*Fake this type of

Datisi · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:26 pm

Norwegian, you played with Naerys before?

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:28 pm

In post 50, Datisi wrote:Your vote and reasoning strike me as opportunistic.

Btw, I actually
had
been loosely following a couple of games you happened to play in as they were happening. Unfortunately I don't remember much about your play at all.

What is your definition of opportunistic? I’m trying to get us out of RVS by pointing out a genuine concern i had against a slot. It’s not the kind of "easy to jump on, super convincing and convenient" type of vote that entails it being "opportunistic". Your reason for scumreading me is off.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:29 pm

In post 58, Datisi wrote:Norwegian, you played with Naerys before?

No, but i saw she had one finished towngame, so i went through it. Her town behaviour in that game matches what i’ve seen here so far.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:29 pm

In post 56, Kanna wrote:
In post 43, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Were you really not serious? It’s not just that btw, you started the day off making excuses. I usually take that as a bad omen.
Yeah, don't agree with that push but don't like this post in particular. The "I actually had other reasons for scumreading you," feels off. VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

In what way?

Datisi · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:32 pm

Voting someone who put someone else at L-2 two pages in is very "easy to jump on, super convincing and convenient" imo. Yeah, sure, putting them at L-2 that fast is weird. Why is it scum-indicative?

Why do you think scum!Naeyrs wouldn't be able to fake that?

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:33 pm

Because she’s new at the game and it shows.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:35 pm

Personal experience, but the first time i played a newbie game i pointed out someone’s vote putting a barely contributing slot to L-2 was scummy, and pushed for that slot all day. Then i got lynched because they didn’t believe me, later it turned out that slot was scum.
That’s why i always get nervous about early and fast wagons potentially having scum in it.

Kanna · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:43 pm

In post 61, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 56, Kanna wrote:
In post 43, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Were you really not serious? It’s not just that btw, you started the day off making excuses. I usually take that as a bad omen.
Yeah, don't agree with that push but don't like this post in particular. The "I actually had other reasons for scumreading you," feels off. VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
In what way?

It feels a bit tacked on/unnatural imo. Sorta like your earlier reason for SRing Map fell off and you had to come up with another reason to justify SRing Map.

Kanna · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:46 pm

But agree on Naerys + Map Wolf's #53 had some good points.

Kanna · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:51 pm

In post 49, Naerys wrote:
In post 48, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Daitsi, you’ve never seen my townplay before. So how can you be so sure already?
for all we know you might be scum partner of MapWolf and trying to stage something scummy

In post 52, Naerys wrote:Perhaps they are trying distancing.

This actually reminds me of something Map said in that other game. Do you remember, Map?

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 3:00 pm

UNVOTE:
I like Map’s response. Feel like scum!him would have voted me there rather than just defending and taking the opportunity to also criticize Datisi.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 3:05 pm

In post 65, Kanna wrote:
In post 61, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 56, Kanna wrote:
In post 43, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Were you really not serious? It’s not just that btw, you started the day off making excuses. I usually take that as a bad omen.
Yeah, don't agree with that push but don't like this post in particular. The "I actually had other reasons for scumreading you," feels off. VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
In what way?
It feels a bit tacked on/unnatural imo. Sorta like your earlier reason for SRing Map fell off and you had to come up with another reason to justify SRing Map.

It was more like an addition. But i can accept that you might have seen it that way.

Saladman27 · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:01 pm

I'm leaning towards Norway, cause 68 doesn"t really justify you for me. I wanna hear GBJ Dec and Virgo's thoughts first.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:01 pm

Nothing i’ve done so far has been scummy. I’ve generated reads the only way i know how, by voting and analyzing people’s behaviour surrounding it.
Naerys is town, Map Wolf is most likely too due to reasons mentioned. It is also genuinely surprising to me when i’m trying to be completely open about my intentions yet people question it.

Datisi · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Sun Dec 29, 2019 2:58 am

Why is it surprising to you that people would question your intentions

in a game of Mafia

?

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Sun Dec 29, 2019 3:02 am

Because i’m town. :>
Lel.
Anyway i know this is a newbie game so i’m not too bothered about being scumread for what i think are bad reasons. This is a game for learning after all. My expectations aren’t high.
I just wanna build up some reads and hope i’m right.

Datisi · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Sun Dec 29, 2019 3:03 am

Your condescending attitude is indeed very charming, I'm convinced.