Team Mafia 2020: Open Setup - Game Over

OkaPoka · Post Post #500 (ISO) » Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:39 pm

just say ur dva so i can mark you down as town babyrage

OkaPoka · Post Post #501 (ISO) » Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:48 pm

although nobody on your team mafia team has played with me being scum?

Nancy Drew 39 · Post Post #502 (ISO) » Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:23 pm

In post 500, OkaPoka wrote:just say ur dva so i can mark you down as town babyrage

I hydra’d with him as DrewVa twice, once in Overkill 2 and 2nd in LNT.

NaCl · Post Post #503 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 1:55 am

Hey, Oka, could you spell out why Krazy is not really engaging with the game and that makes him scum? I'm just not seeing him jump out at me among this slow start.

Because I kind of agree with the first part, but I also feel like there are other people who aren't doing that and are doing it worse.
Mostly Eddie Cane, who said he wouldn't be around much and then made use of his time to go and do irrelevant things. I don't really doubt the fact that he's on vacation, but assuming that's the case, I would have expected something more substantial rather than skirting around.
VOTE: Eddie Cane

Hectic · Post Post #504 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:21 am

You guys are doing great.

pisskop · Post Post #505 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:31 am

Yea, but on a scale of 1 to 100, how much greater am

I

doing?

ISO · Post Post #506 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:01 am

In post 503, NaCl wrote:I would have expected something more substantial rather than skirting around.

ISO · Post Post #507 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:03 am

Funny though it was that Eddie vote was garbage.

"I know he's on vacation but he should be contributing anyway" like how do you know how much time he has for mafia right now.

Hectic · Post Post #508 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:26 am

In post 505, pisskop wrote:Yea, but on a scale of 1 to 100, how much greater am
I
doing?

Knowing you, 110.

NaCl · Post Post #509 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:30 am

In post 507, Something_Smart wrote:Funny though it was that Eddie vote was garbage.

"I know he's on vacation but he should be contributing anyway" like how do you know how much time he has for mafia right now.

That's not what I said. It's more that he has enough time to post in this game but doesn't seem to be making anything of substance.

ISO · Post Post #510 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:32 am

I mean having enough time to post and having enough time to read and then post are two different things and you seem to be conflating them.

NaCl · Post Post #511 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:34 am

In post 510, Something_Smart wrote:I mean having enough time to post and having enough time to read and then post are two different things and you seem to be conflating them.

Maybe, but I don't see the point in posting for the sake of posting.

ISO · Post Post #512 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:39 am

But is posting for the sake of posting scummy?

NaCl · Post Post #513 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:44 am

In post 512, Something_Smart wrote:But is posting for the sake of posting scummy?

I think it could be. Although to be fair, posting thoughts without being really caught up is worse, which isn't the case here. I suppose it's unproductive but you are right that he could have time to post and not read fully so he's only responding to trivial things. Do you believe that he hasn't been reading the thread beyond what is immediately there? Or is that just a hypothetical?

Eddie, is your vote on Nancy serious?

ISO · Post Post #514 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:48 am

In post 513, NaCl wrote:Do you believe that he hasn't been reading the thread beyond what is immediately there? Or is that just a hypothetical?

I mean, it's the natural assumption to make when he's barely posting and his posts only interact with stuff immediately before them.

I don't think there's anything wrong with throwing out a few short posts while on vacation.

NaCl · Post Post #515 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:51 am

His posts gave me more the impression that he had read the thread, though.

NaCl · Post Post #516 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:53 am

Actually, upon rereading, you might be right. Yeah, I think I'm being too focused.

NaCl · Post Post #517 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:55 am

UNVOTE:

I'm still not completely convinced but it's unproductive to really think about it. I'm pretty busy myself today and will spend more time on looking through people tomorrow.

Elsa Jay · Post Post #518 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 5:40 am

Spoiler:

Titus · Post Post #519 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:22 am

@Krazy, We aren't playing with who can beat us. Anyone can be lynched. If we were, we'd have to vote Nancy because her response is to belittle anyone who suspects her is toxic as fuck. We vote scum.

Pine is pretty surely town. So is Oka.

If I am wrong, I'll suck it up and deal with it then.

pisskop · Post Post #520 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:27 am

In post 508, Hectic wrote:
In post 505, pisskop wrote:Yea, but on a scale of 1 to 100, how much greater am
I
doing?
Knowing you, 110.

I'm pretty sure you haven't seen me at my best.

i consider myself to be a top tier player. not top 10, but certainly if you got a large game with the best players of the site than I'd have a home there

pisskop · Post Post #521 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:28 am

hmmm

although a lot of super good players left soon after I joined . . .

bob3141 · Post Post #522 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:33 am

In post 256, Something_Smart wrote:I don't think scum-bob would have any difficulty making that post?

I find this a little weird. From its chronology I can only assuem you were responding to nan posts. Where she questiosn hectic vote. A posts that does not imply she a town read on me but that a it stands she couldnt see anything scum indicative so far. Which is far cry from some thinkign that post looks towny. What she said is she liked my doc comments. Which is different from town reading those comments. But instead reading them as value to town

But you first response is to shout (paraphrased)" oh but scum bob could make that post"

I could understand this if it was accompanied by something you claimed to have seen that resulted in you scum reading. But there is no comment on my alignment in your post.

So im trying it hard to see the purpose of your post

I just cant see you making that post if you didnt already have scum read one me. Unless you were scum trying to shade what i said.

Nancy Drew 39 · Post Post #523 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:36 am

In post 519, Titus wrote:@Krazy, We aren't playing with who can beat us. Anyone can be lynched. If we were, we'd have to vote Nancy because her response is to belittle anyone who suspects her is toxic as fuck. We vote scum.

Pine is pretty surely town. So is Oka.

If I am wrong, I'll suck it up and deal with it then.

I was going to publically apologise to you because it was wrong of me to threaten to pl you but your push on me last night was disgustingly shitty but it’s obviously not against site rules for someone to bully people and be hurtful and tonedeaf.

Nancy Drew 39 · Post Post #524 (ISO) » Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:46 am

In post 523, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
In post 519, Titus wrote:@Krazy, We aren't playing with who can beat us. Anyone can be lynched. If we were, we'd have to vote Nancy because her response is to belittle anyone who suspects her is toxic as fuck. We vote scum.

Pine is pretty surely town. So is Oka.

If I am wrong, I'll suck it up and deal with it then.
I was going to publically apologise to you because it was wrong of me to threaten to pl you but your push on me last night was disgustingly shitty but it’s obviously not against site rules for someone to bully people and be hurtful and tonedeaf.

You accused me of being abusive to you in HP when I treated you similarly, the only difference is you were actually scum in that game, so I obviously have to ask, why the hypocrisy here? Why do you think it’s ever okay for you to do something to me that you called “abusive” in a past game, when I was actually right but you doing the exact same thing to me here but being dead wrong, is somehow okay with you?