In post 190, Farkran wrote:Do you think espresso jumped opportunistically on the wagon against anka? Does this mean you think Anka's recent exchanges are NAI and this is scum!espresso trying to find scum motivation where you think there isn't any?
More specifically, why do you think Espresso has voted ankamius based on a superficial analysis whereas you don't find Ankamius reactions superficial?
I think his reasoning is pretty bad and shallow. It shows a lack of thinking. If he jumped on the wagon for ank sure, but that isn't the main reason to vote him. It's just an added reason. I do think Anks recent exchanges are NAI, but even if I was scumreading Ank for example I would still find this bad.
I know Ank is a really good player and I think what she did was either fooling around or a test. Whereas Espresso wasn't. I think Scum Ank has no reason to really do what she did there and I'd like to think others would as well.
In post 202, chennisden wrote:1) Farkran's ISO is towny on a surface level but actually bad if you read it
2) He's posting in a way that makes it really easy to just skim/not actually read his posts but moreso focus on the interactions around him, which really just comes from scum a lot (see Reundo in Large normal 224, etc)
3) Sounds reasonable at first glance but there's a lot of scummy overeagerness, which as #2 says, kind of doesn't get read into
(I did read the wall but I’m not posting about each point)
Point 1 is pretty buzz and doesn’t mean much (however you talked about this more in the wall so it’s moot)
Point 2 I don’t mind until you bring up another player. Like, saying player X did this as scum so player Y does it as scum is one of the worst reasons to read a player cause with that logic anyone can be scum.
Point 3 why is overeagerness scummy?
My read on Fakran is he’s playing the game in a hyper mode, but I don’t really see what he’s saying as bad.
In post 226, davesaz wrote:I understand chenn’s Post and see why those things are interpreted that way but they are the type of things I’d townread that player for. So far anyway the game is young.
Might agree with scumreading others for that
.
What does this even mean?
In post 244, davesaz wrote:Fl link a town game you started off disinterested in. I just saw a scumgame where you weren’t your usual playful self.
Yeah I’m fine voting Dave at the moment. ‘This one game I saw you in you acted like this so you’re scummy’ I might be bias cause I’ve seen this logic used on me and it pisses me off but still this line of thinking is just bad.
In post 256, GuyInFreezer wrote:You shouldn't give up that easily.
This being TM and what not.
But I'll take the free D1 scum lynch.
VOTE: volpe
I’ve skimmed volpe cause I don’t think they’ve posted anything of value. What am I missing?
(That's MY effect)