Newbie 1976 - Game Over

[NorwegianboyEE]

Just look at my ISO and ctrl f Naery.

[Xtoxm]

VC 2.1

[1] Datisi:

NorwegianboyEE

[6] Not Voting:

Naerys, Non Imh, Map Wolf, Ph0enix, Saladman27, Datisi

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch

The Day 2 deadline is in

: (expired on 2020-01-13 18:21:44)

[Datisi]

I hardclaim mason mafia wont shoot me no balls

I unironically like this post.
Don’t think Non Imh is scum.

Er, what does "unironically" liking a Mason claim mean?

[NorwegianboyEE]

I thought he was joking at first, and i TR him for that. But then i realized he was being serious.
But either way, i was right about him being a TR. Ta ta.

[NorwegianboyEE]

Your attempt at finding fake associations between me and Naery's is intensifying my scumread on you.

[Datisi]

Okay, went through the ISO. First it was think Naerys is Town due to the similarity to the previous game, then you don't like her play and you thought she was either scum or a counterwagon to GBJ (who flipped Town), then it's "seems like she's Town" and Naerys reaction to our start of Day 2 seeme Townie.

So... if you could expand what the thoughts on the wagons are now and what about her reaction "seemed Townie", I'd appreciate it.

pedit: do you not see how your attempts to find associations between me/Salad can come off the same way?

[Ph0enix]

Now that I wrote it all down, I still don't know which one was a better idea to begin with. So I'm not sure how everyone seemed to be to certain in defending one side of this argument. I agree I might be missing out on something here, but still.

Look at how many cases there are in which scum and Mason cc each other. Trading a PR for scum is always +town. Meanwhile, if the Mason claims unprompted with no cc, they just die.

That's a fair statement.

@Norway (addressing 518 and 519): I can see where your concerns are coming from but I need more information on this, as I said. Also, I also went through your ISO and I, for some reason, still don't get why you TR Naerys. So basically what I'm asking for is for you to explain a bit further.

[Naerys]

First it was think Naerys is Town due to the similarity to the previous game, then you don't like her play and you thought she was either scum or a counterwagon to GBJ (who flipped Town), then it's "seems like she's Town" and Naerys reaction to our start of Day 2 seeme Townie.

When you put it like this, it sounds suspicious.

[NorwegianboyEE]

Regarding the previous day, GBJ was a failed lead that would only lead to further mislynches, hence the game needed to be reread with the thought of GBJ/Kanna/Non Imh being town in mind.
Naery' doesn't seem like she has any agenda mind with any of her posts. I don't think she's expressed a TR on anyone except me. And i know i'm town. She is distrusting, quick to anger and acting like a total newb with some bad argumentation that proves she's not playing to be townread, but playing to solve. Again, that usually comes from town, not scum.

[Datisi]

I don't think she's expressed a TR on anyone except me. And i know i'm town.

And this is Town indicative because...?

[NorwegianboyEE]

Just subconciously push out the POV arguments, i always include them.
Why are you ignoring everything else i said in that post?

[Datisi]

I genuinely don't get how that is Town indicative for Naerys even from town!you POV.

Because that seemed like the biggest flaw in your arguments and I didn't feel like replying to every single sentence.

[Ph0enix]

@Naerys: Current reads?

[Ph0enix]

She is distrusting, quick to anger and acting like a total newb with some bad argumentation that proves she's not playing to be townread, but playing to solve. Again, that usually comes from town, not scum.

Any other reason for townreading her except that one?

[NorwegianboyEE]

Nah it's mostly a gut read. And i don't see any strong associatives, except maybe Phoenix. But if Phoenix is scum we've pretty much lost already i think.

[Datisi]

I genuinely don't get how that is Town indicative for Naerys even from town!you POV.

[Ph0enix]

Nah it's mostly a gut read.

Well, you could've said that from the start. A gut read cannot be treated the same way as a legit read.

And i don't see any strong associatives, except maybe Phoenix.

Associatives, as in other townreads? Weren't you townreading Non, or I am mistaken?

But if Phoenix is scum we've pretty much lost already i think.

Lmao. I'll take that as a compliment.

[NorwegianboyEE]

There's also the fact i looked into her previous game and it seemed relatively similar to her play in this one.
Although i might revisit it when i'm feeling more motivated to see if it still holds up.

[NorwegianboyEE]

Associatives

Scum team association.

[NorwegianboyEE]

As in.
Pairing player X with Y and recognizing them as scum partners.

[Datisi]

VOTE: Norwegian

[NorwegianboyEE]

If players are playing with a "individualistic mindset" where they don't care who they lynch or go after, it is usually town indicative because it proves they don't have an agenda of protecting their teammate.

[NorwegianboyEE]

VOTE: Norwegian

Took you long enough.

[Naerys]

@Naerys: Current reads?

Right now i am trying to heal myself from Norwegian and Datisi arguing with each other.

Non is town.

I´d like to get more from Map Wolf - he has whole 1 post at day 2.
Saladman aswell.
And there is Datisi vs Norwegian, which kind of annoys one. Not sure if scum would try to annoy players like that.

Btw it´s funny how Datisi and Norwegian are already over 100 posts. I doubt that indicates anything, but they certainly are very active.

[Datisi]

Indicates i like posting and/or have a bit too much free time.