Agree, I like the logic in that post.In post 1248, Something_Smart wrote:Nice, NaCl is town.
@NaCl: What do you dislike about my Pops townread?
Agree, I like the logic in that post.In post 1248, Something_Smart wrote:Nice, NaCl is town.
We don't have to follow your reads though. Without posting your reads, your UTR (though I thought 2 people were voting you?) might dip back to null so might as well prevent that from happening.In post 1249, OkaPoka wrote:but also the way I see it there is very little value for me to just be completely transparent and sharing all my notes at every stage of the game because
1) my reputation of scumhunting is mediocre at best
2) I am pretty much a utr so I don't need to bother with proving myself as town
so the gain of me outting my reads is that it can
1) reassure everyone that im townie i guess
2) have notes that other people can work off of
the loss is
1) i don't get to be a spooky wildcard
2) i am more susceptible to being lead to the wrong place
I definitely think you’re town from this but I don’t necessarily agree with your reasoning for tr Hectic, because if he was in fact scum trying to out the PR, why would he back off?In post 1244, NaCl wrote:Pops, I would have expected you to have a stronger read on me. But it's not that "I'm just doing what Farkran told me" but rather that he convinced me on Okapoka's posts that they're not really something I should be townreading. Because I was initially townreading Oka and Farkran convinced me otherwise. And when you say it like that it's discrediting.In post 1141, popsofctown wrote:It's a data point. I've liked a lot of his other posts. I think he's netted to null. I can't remember whether I've stated how much I like the other posts itt or not.
NaCl is a really strange slot. He just randomly said "my teammate told me to vote the UTR so I'm now voting the UTR" and it seems too wolfy to be wolf. I can't make sense of it.
All these things seem like way smaller deals than Eddie Cane scumslipping so I feel like I'm on crazy pills
pedit: whoa like 8 pedits
Also, @Oka well, if you don't want to tell me about what you were thinking in the past that's not a good look. Literally everything you do feels like it's trying to make it hard for me to understand you. Yes, I get that you explaining opinions you don't have anymore doesn't help the game progress. But it helps me read you.
Amrun, could you say what it was you were originally thinking and why you changed your mind on it?In post 1195, Amrun wrote:Quite on the contrary, if I was scum I would have carefully reread that before posting.
I started off composing the sentence as one thing, then changed my mind and forgot to go back and omit Pine’s name from the first part. Basically I was going to lump them together and say something slightly different, then decided that Pine deserved his own sentence.
Specifically when you were trying to press Nancy for an answer to your question and getting scumread by her for it, I don't see why you didn't just stop (I still think you were wrong on it since it might out the PR). Because you didn't have to keep asking the question and the fact that you continued to press it despite it being unpopular felt like you were tunnelling on trying to get your answer more than you cared about how you looked to her. I think that if you were scum you would have admitted to your mistake or otherwise backed off.In post 1213, Hectic wrote:I ISOed NaCl. I disliked his dislike for Eddie based on the vacation and posting for the sake of posting things. I liked his comments on my wagon and the comment on the doc crumb thing and resulting conversation with Nancy.
@NaCl: "I think Hectic's posts haven't been too great but there are times where I see a move that I think scum-Hectic would make but Hectic is specifically not making those actions." - can you specify what kind of scum moves you thought I would make but didn't make?
I think I missed where he flipped a read based on his teammate's opinions or something like that. Can someone link me to that post?
@Oka
Could you explain what made you change your mind on the Pine wagon?
@Eddie cane
I kind of think that if Hectic flips scum then it's more likely that pops is scum. I don't agree with Hectic's reasons for townreading her and pops's feels like she's soft-defending Hectic
Regarding Pine, I really think this wagon is worse than the Hectic one and that Pine is town, although I think he's been consistently wrong in his reads on Hectic (well, also me). Like, I'm still in favour of Okapoka because I feel like he's not really engaging directly. Every attempt I make to try and understand him feels like he's deliberately avoiding me and I don't think he's really gotten into any kind of long drawn out discussion of how he thinks. I know pretty much everyone disagrees with me but I don't get why.
+1In post 1248, Something_Smart wrote:Nice, NaCl is town.
yeah i mean im not forcing anyone to follow my lead so?In post 1251, Hectic wrote:We don't have to follow your reads though. Without posting your reads, your UTR (though I thought 2 people were voting you?) might dip back to null so might as well prevent that from happening.In post 1249, OkaPoka wrote:but also the way I see it there is very little value for me to just be completely transparent and sharing all my notes at every stage of the game because
1) my reputation of scumhunting is mediocre at best
2) I am pretty much a utr so I don't need to bother with proving myself as town
so the gain of me outting my reads is that it can
1) reassure everyone that im townie i guess
2) have notes that other people can work off of
the loss is
1) i don't get to be a spooky wildcard
2) i am more susceptible to being lead to the wrong place
so no harm in being completely transparent and sharing all your reads is what I mean.In post 1254, OkaPoka wrote:yeah i mean im not forcing anyone to follow my lead so?In post 1251, Hectic wrote:We don't have to follow your reads though. Without posting your reads, your UTR (though I thought 2 people were voting you?) might dip back to null so might as well prevent that from happening.In post 1249, OkaPoka wrote:but also the way I see it there is very little value for me to just be completely transparent and sharing all my notes at every stage of the game because
1) my reputation of scumhunting is mediocre at best
2) I am pretty much a utr so I don't need to bother with proving myself as town
so the gain of me outting my reads is that it can
1) reassure everyone that im townie i guess
2) have notes that other people can work off of
the loss is
1) i don't get to be a spooky wildcard
2) i am more susceptible to being lead to the wrong place
your underestimating how valuable it is for scum to get townread by utrs and how easy it is to get townread as scum by mirroring thoughts without coming off as overly buddyingIn post 1255, Hectic wrote:so no harm in being completely transparent and sharing all your reads is what I mean.In post 1254, OkaPoka wrote:yeah i mean im not forcing anyone to follow my lead so?In post 1251, Hectic wrote:We don't have to follow your reads though. Without posting your reads, your UTR (though I thought 2 people were voting you?) might dip back to null so might as well prevent that from happening.In post 1249, OkaPoka wrote:but also the way I see it there is very little value for me to just be completely transparent and sharing all my notes at every stage of the game because
1) my reputation of scumhunting is mediocre at best
2) I am pretty much a utr so I don't need to bother with proving myself as town
so the gain of me outting my reads is that it can
1) reassure everyone that im townie i guess
2) have notes that other people can work off of
the loss is
1) i don't get to be a spooky wildcard
2) i am more susceptible to being lead to the wrong place
That's fair.In post 1256, OkaPoka wrote:your underestimating how valuable it is for scum to get townread by utrs and how easy it is to get townread as scum by mirroring thoughts without coming off as overly buddying
and how easy it is for scum to lead townies to bad lynches by pushing tasty teams
In post 1261, OkaPoka wrote:maybe we take the easy way out and lynch ddl
Oi, you're voting me, aren't you? I'm not your buddy, pal.In post 1264, DrDolittle wrote:that's a bad idea buddy
Horrible vote
I kinda feel like as scum S_S is slightly faster to develop an 'agenda' after being called out for being passive whereas here he's kinda just been protecting his townreads. I don't know that makes him locktown like others have said but it isn't exactly the progression I'd expect to see from him as scumIn post 619, popsofctown wrote:I usually hesitate to use meta, but S_S is such a weird player it's close to required, otherwise you're either going to policy lynch him every single game for not using his vote or townlock him as both alignments for never ever pushing an agenda when those things are just how S_S plays.
AgreeIn post 627, Something_Smart wrote:This is an extremely shallow read.In post 615, Pine wrote:Yeah, Hectic is definitely the lynch today. Gut feeling, he's trying to draw out the real Doc.
This seems like a pretty reasonable response to 654
Have you played with scum piss Nancy?In post 688, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:I’m not confident on it, I’m a lot more confident on certain tr. Like you, Krazy, Titus, Elsa, Piss, for example.
I like this and actually her paragon dig at Pine on the page before.In post 689, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:UNVOTE:
While this can be fair, she handles the pressure of scumreads worse as scum, this is not yet in the ballpark of MD2 (where she was scum) but feels easily within the range of LNT (where she was town)In post 697, OkaPoka wrote:I've never seen you last this long being mad at someone or get this pissed this early for people not marking you as town.
What does any of this post have to do with voting me?In post 706, popsofctown wrote:This is one of S_S's posts that is one of his goodpostings
and its logic applies to how I am not eager to justify a read for the 999th time that I'm not sure about
With some effort I could articulate some elements of what's a mismatch, some of it is harder to articulate
I can tell you virtually none of the patterns were present in Crown, I don't know if that's incidental or if S_S tends to play IC differently.
VOTE: Krazy