In post 2694, teacher wrote:I’d rather not lynch either of you today,
In post 2825, teacher wrote:I’d rather Ari
Yea, this is definitely not subtle. You trying to paint it that way is.....disturbing, actually.In post 2838, teacher wrote:I was trying to push the lynch back to ari
it's totally possible, sorry.In post 2948, MathBlade wrote:Reading between the lines all that says is you don’t understand how I formed my reads. And that’s okay.
This feels eerily similar to what I've been screaming for a few dozen pages.In post 2950, teacher wrote:In post 2694, teacher wrote:I’d rather not lynch either of you today,In post 2825, teacher wrote:I’d rather AriYea, this is definitely not subtle. You trying to paint it that way is.....disturbing, actually.In post 2838, teacher wrote:I was trying to push the lynch back to ari
Yawn.This feels eerily similar to what I've been screaming for a few dozen pages.
Yet that’s not the only solve. Stop painting it as such please.In post 2952, the worst wrote:it's totally possible, sorry.In post 2948, MathBlade wrote:Reading between the lines all that says is you don’t understand how I formed my reads. And that’s okay.
i don't follow your full read trajectory, and i do know for a fact your {tw, rc, ari} solve is wrong. i also feel it has exactly one scum in it. but i'm also scum per it, so i'm always going to say this.
i still strongly feel that your reads are your own, and even if i don't follow them completely they feel authentic and the way you're projecting them feels real.
if you feel like i need to understand something i'm willing to listen. but you're right, i'm a step or two behind.
And why can’t this be applied to you and Ari pray tell?In post 2956, RadiantCowbells wrote:Subtle may not be the right word there but I think that you should be able to understand what pinged me in that posting and why. More, expressing lip service to being willing to L1 Duck sometime in the future then making actions designed to make Ari the lynch. It's more the fact that you gave intent but I read a lot of unwillingness so
It hypothetically could.In post 2959, MathBlade wrote:And why can’t this be applied to you and Ari pray tell?
didn't mean to imply those were your only reads. sorry if it came across that way.In post 2958, MathBlade wrote:Yet that’s not the only solve. Stop painting it as such please.In post 2952, the worst wrote:it's totally possible, sorry.In post 2948, MathBlade wrote:Reading between the lines all that says is you don’t understand how I formed my reads. And that’s okay.
i don't follow your full read trajectory, and i do know for a fact your {tw, rc, ari} solve is wrong. i also feel it has exactly one scum in it. but i'm also scum per it, so i'm always going to say this.
i still strongly feel that your reads are your own, and even if i don't follow them completely they feel authentic and the way you're projecting them feels real.
if you feel like i need to understand something i'm willing to listen. but you're right, i'm a step or two behind.
There’s a lot of worlds I am considering. This is just the most prevalent.
I'm not sure how to respond to this besides to say that this is how I see things when I'm trying to get a wagon and people are fighting it. I could probably cite numerous examples of me reacting in a fashion that you would similarly perceive as 'accurste but overstated' in situations like this. Would you like me to find some?In post 2957, teacher wrote:Yea, it’s a wording/tone issue more than a substance issue. Like I get what you’re saying and am aware I am defending duc- I have reservations about his lynch even if I prefer it to yours. It’s just that I think you overstated it in a weird way - “casing” when I had one offhand sentence responding to tw’s read (not as an affirmative point) and “as subtlety as possible” when I don’t think I’ve been subtle at all.
