Mini Normal 2115: Fin

[AaronFrost]

Well I don’t explain. It’s in my sig.

It’s apparent reading the game why. Maybe less fake post restriction and more reading

Explaining the reason for you read would be pretty helpful tho

Are you referring to Macabre or Alch with the post restriction thing?

[Wimpy]

VOTE: alchemist
Nothing better atm.

To be fair that isn't much of a reason

I'm not sure how he got that conclusion

Yeah me neither. It’s very suspect

[Wimpy]

Explaining the reason for you read would be pretty helpful tho

Are you referring to Macabre or Alch with the post restriction thing?

the one thing about me is I will always speak my mind. If I don't like something I will say it. So if you see me vote for somebody, you can look through my iso and see what about that person i didn't like.

Macabre. I was unaware Alch was doing one.

Macabre asked me a question and I had no clue what he was asking. he has made many posts that i don't understand and since there is no macabre to english translator built in, I am not going to waste time trying to decipher what he is saying.

[AaronFrost]

So you scumread Alch because he came to the conclusion that you don't respond poorly to pressure which you later responded saying that you don't respond well to it.

Was it the question in 49 that pinged you? Because I could definitely see that coming from scum if he wanted to try and instigate something.

[Wimpy]

It wouldn’t call it a scum read but yes that was the reason. I don’t know why people are asking about it.

[Wimpy]

It’s not just one thing. It’s the overall situation that pinged me

[Looker]

I'm almost ready; I promise. Do I go after the Pokemon or the demon slayer? These games take too long to start. The Mad Prince or the cute guy with the glasses...? Post restrictions? No...

[JTheophrastus Bartholomew]

People seem to have reads on Profii already. I don't like how Egix96 implied a town read on profii in post 68 and threw shade at those voting him. I think there's a strong chance that if one of profii and Egix96 flip scum, the other one will too

[Ame]

People seem to have reads on Profii already. I don't like how Egix96 implied a town read on profii in post 68 and threw shade at those voting him. I think there's a strong chance that if one of profii and Egix96 flip scum, the other one will too

Who are the people that are scumreading profii? Do you think he is the player being most highly scumread?

Also, are you from dgames?

[Ame]

I am not going to waste time trying to decipher what he is saying.

Will you give it another shot? I had the same feeling from his opening posts, but they are fairly straight forward when you know who he's referring to.

Update to insomnia's list:

Colonel - Alchemist
Chimera - profii
Scarf Boy - Ame
Sleepy boy - insomnia
Burger - Wimpy
Hydra - Looker

Some Translations:

Burger, please explain your reasoning to cast this Colonel to the fire! Urgency!

Wimpy, please explain your reasoning for voting Alchemist.

This crow did not understand the basis for the beliefs of this scarf boy, most definitely the suffering of the chimera. However! It all falls into place if we believe this sleepy boy sleeps with the chimera! Revelation!

I didn't understand Ame's reasoning against profii until I realized that he was implying profii and insomnia were scum partners.

However! The Colonel, has, in the crow's third eye, quoted the wrong post! In a fit of urgency? Did they see the writing that was on the wall? The knowledge not meant to be known? Pre-emption! Conspiracy!

VOTE: Alchemist21

Alchemist made the assumption that I thought he and Wimpy were scum partners when I said nothing of this. Could it be that he, as scum, was inclined to make this connection and jumped the gun?

[Ame]

. So how are the town points unwarranted?

I felt it was too obvious to warrant points. I might be biased

As I said, he wasn't awarding you town points for making the correct conclusion on Wimpy. He was awarding you town points for pointing out that Alchemist didn't make the right conclusion. How easy it was to make the conclusion on Wimpy doesn't play into it.

You've misinterpreted somni two times now and he responded to you both times as if you hadn't. This leads me to suspect that you two are sleeping together, as the crow puts it.

[Wimpy]

I won’t be able to keep track and unless somebody is going to translate everything I can’t read him. Being intentionally unreadable only benefits scum

[Chara]

Ame: i was joking about the bird being obvious town.

Egix: i was wondering why you were concerned about what seemed to be two of many random votes flying around, but it does look like you had a reason. i voted profii for 10, mainly.

i normally have a hard time dealing with gimmick posters, but something about the bird's style is just so attractive. could this be... love?

[Chara]

So what are you scum reading me for again?

Mostly for post 56 which felt a little exaggerated and forced to me. Followed by your immediate retraction about two minutes later. To me it read like 'oh shit I said something that might be perceived as scummy better retract it real quick.'

It's not a strong read tbh but it's a start.

i had the opposite read of insomnia's retraction there. it felt very quick in a way that wasn't forced, but genuine in a sort of "hm, maybe i reacted too quickly", and also as evidence that insomnia is posting without thinking too much about it. which is towny more than scummy.

[Chara]

People seem to have reads on Profii already. I don't like how Egix96 implied a town read on profii in post 68 and threw shade at those voting him. I think there's a strong chance that if one of profii and Egix96 flip scum, the other one will too

i don't think Egix was throwing any shade. 68 is a pretty neutral question. i did have a read on profii, if a minor day 1 ping can be counted as that. this seems a rather strong conclusion to make, and it assumes that scumpartners are going to react to 2-vote wagons are their partner. :>

. So how are the town points unwarranted?

I felt it was too obvious to warrant points. I might be biased

As I said, he wasn't awarding you town points for making the correct conclusion on Wimpy. He was awarding you town points for pointing out that Alchemist didn't make the right conclusion. How easy it was to make the conclusion on Wimpy doesn't play into it.

You've misinterpreted somni two times now and he responded to you both times as if you hadn't. This leads me to suspect that you two are sleeping together, as the crow puts it.

i think i'm too tired to follow the logic in this post (not that it's wrong necessarily, i'll try to reread the interactions talked about again in a bit), but the tone Ame is taking in trying to make misunderstandings clear, and the note about insomnia and profii, earns an early TL. at the very least Ame is paying attention properly.

[Luca Blight]

Catching up now.

Slight SR's on Profii and Mr Frost, as of the start of page 4.

[Luca Blight]

Does that phrase have a secondary meaning I’m not aware of?

You’re not going to replace out just because people suspect you are you?

What was the point of this post by the way? It made me sick to my stomach actually. It feels really weird and it's like against the grain with the thread state. What were you hoping to achieve with this? I get you know he replaced out of games, but what was this achieving? I felt it really unnecessary.

It's totally off-topic and I interpreted it as a personal attack rather than an attempt at figuring out anything.

What was the point of bringing attention to it? I don't like how overexaggerated this post is. It was just a simple question.

Looks like I found my first serious scum read this game.

VOTE: insomnia

Although I kind of agree with this

[Luca Blight]

I disagree with Alch that 57 bleeds Town - I could easily see self-correction coming from scum who worry about leaving themselves open to attack.

That reminds me though that while I agree with Frost's 75, I got a scum ping because he basically just repeated what Insomnia said in his 'correction' post.

[Luca Blight]

I like and agree with Ame's 103. It sums up a lot of my own thoughts towards Profii at this point.

[Luca Blight]

I played as Masons with Profii before and he was so hungry to push the game forward and find scum, I'm not feeling that at all from him so far.

VOTE: Profii

I'm mostly caught up, but skimmed some parts. I'll start ISO'ing in more detail.

[profii]

. So how are the town points unwarranted?

I felt it was too obvious to warrant points. I might be biased

As I said, he wasn't awarding you town points for making the correct conclusion on Wimpy. He was awarding you town points for pointing out that Alchemist didn't make the right conclusion. How easy it was to make the conclusion on Wimpy doesn't play into it.

You've misinterpreted somni two times now and he responded to you both times as if you hadn't. This leads me to suspect that you two are sleeping together, as the crow puts it.

I disagree with the first paragraph. It seems the same thing to me

But I dont think you'll ever convince me and it seems like semantics so...

[profii]

It's fairly obvious from your #64 that you hadn't played with Wimpy, so this added no value and comes off to me as pseudoengagement

as much as I called it semantics, Luca linked this post and it seemed worthwhile to comment on this bit

I get where your thinking comes from here but I often ask people semi-obvious and very simple/plain questions to get them to commit to something

On this occasion it seemed like something unexplainable was happening- if alch had plainly said "yes I've played with wimpy" then the context of this whole thing is totally different

My question was a simple yes or no - you cant be vague, you can only ignore it... it's a bit of a work habit but I find it's a useful tool to get people to commit to a yes/no then hold them to it later

[profii]

I played as Masons with Profii before and he was so hungry to push the game forward and find scum, I'm not feeling that at all from him so far.

VOTE: Profii

I'm mostly caught up, but skimmed some parts. I'll start ISO'ing in more detail.

My thought in that game was I had a solid claim so I could push the game as hard as I like and if I got a lot of pressure I had a self claim.

My role in this game does not self resolve so I cant play like that

Ironically, I expected my Mason-style to attract more scum reads than normal and it seems the opposite is happening here

[profii]

Hmm
Time to go to work, let's see how Friday's journey goes this week

I'll look a bit more closely at this game later

[Ame]

Could you explain how they are the same.

Wimpy: I like bacon
Alch: I don't think Wimpy likes bacon.
Profii: I don't know how Alch concluded that.

What Insomnia is saying: I like that profii pointed out that Alch is wrong.

What you're claiming he's saying: I like that profii concluded that Wimpy likes bacon.

These are completely different things. He town read you for calling out alch, not for reading wimpy correctly.