titus, youre being incredibly hard headed about this.In post 3694, Titus wrote:Threat's not veiled. It's either you or your buddy. Take your pick.
in rvs?In post 3699, Titus wrote:Onto their buddy, nope.In post 3697, pisskop wrote:Like -full stop- you said scum wouldnt sheep in rvs
If You haven't realized at this point I'm an emotional player you've been reading me wrong since post 1. Don't just tell me my feeling are "lul fucking scummy AtE".In post 3698, pisskop wrote:still scum AtEing around about their feelsIn post 3696, Elsa Jay wrote:I voted Eddie at that point because I was mad at him for making Krazy feel bad. The replacement just demotivated me.
Not weak trends. Discrediting my methods doesn't get me to change my mind.In post 3700, pisskop wrote:titus, youre being incredibly hard headed about this.In post 3694, Titus wrote:Threat's not veiled. It's either you or your buddy. Take your pick.
youre using weak trends in vca to justify your vote and when its wrong youll just shrug and say 'opps'.
its a bad habit as town.
Yup.In post 3702, pisskop wrote:in rvs?In post 3699, Titus wrote:Onto their buddy, nope.In post 3697, pisskop wrote:Like -full stop- you said scum wouldnt sheep in rvs
Highly unlikely he's reading you wrong. Pisskop's not taking the self interested answer and voting NaCl. He also won't say NaCl is town.In post 3703, Elsa Jay wrote:If You haven't realized at this point I'm an emotional player you've been reading me wrong since post 1. Don't just tell me my feeling are "lul fucking scummy AtE".In post 3698, pisskop wrote:still scum AtEing around about their feelsIn post 3696, Elsa Jay wrote:I voted Eddie at that point because I was mad at him for making Krazy feel bad. The replacement just demotivated me.
No, you disappearing and not contributing a fucking thing and coming back, promising to play and answer questions and then ateing around moreIn post 3703, Elsa Jay wrote:If You haven't realized at this point I'm an emotional player you've been reading me wrong since post 1. Don't just tell me my feeling are "lul fucking scummy AtE".In post 3698, pisskop wrote:still scum AtEing around about their feelsIn post 3696, Elsa Jay wrote:I voted Eddie at that point because I was mad at him for making Krazy feel bad. The replacement just demotivated me.
I beg anyone here to say they would not sheepvote onto their partner in rvs.In post 3705, Titus wrote:Yup.In post 3702, pisskop wrote:in rvs?In post 3699, Titus wrote:Onto their buddy, nope.In post 3697, pisskop wrote:Like -full stop- you said scum wouldnt sheep in rvs
Im not doing this with you titus. Many scum might lack the balls to do it, but most experienced players would.In post 3708, Titus wrote:Instead, pisskop wants to discredit my methods and force the lynch onto you.
Me. If you think it's wrong go to the last few completed opens. RVS. See how many scum vote their partner in the second slot. Double it if the slot is campaigning for the consensus opinion.In post 3709, pisskop wrote:I beg anyone here to say they would not sheepvote onto their partner in rvs.In post 3705, Titus wrote:Yup.In post 3702, pisskop wrote:in rvs?In post 3699, Titus wrote:Onto their buddy, nope.In post 3697, pisskop wrote:Like -full stop- you said scum wouldnt sheep in rvs
If you think my VCA is wrong, you're welcome to do your own. I'm not threatened by that.In post 3710, pisskop wrote:Im not doing this with you titus. Many scum might lack the balls to do it, but most experienced players would.In post 3708, Titus wrote:Instead, pisskop wants to discredit my methods and force the lynch onto you.
i would
off cuff players like saudade or bbt would. tse, nacho, any player who was coached to. if their partner did a funny little wink, like christ.
How many opportunities did those slots have to sheep?In post 3711, Titus wrote:Me. If you think it's wrong go to the last few completed opens. RVS. See how many scum vote their partner in the second slot. Double it if the slot is campaigning for the consensus opinion.
I didnt, but ive just watched you and nancy waste oddles of pages on it. theres no reason to vca.In post 3712, Titus wrote:If you think my VCA is wrong, you're welcome to do your own. I'm not threatened by that.
Years of experience is not a small sample size.In post 3713, pisskop wrote:How many opportunities did those slots have to sheep?In post 3711, Titus wrote:Me. If you think it's wrong go to the last few completed opens. RVS. See how many scum vote their partner in the second slot. Double it if the slot is campaigning for the consensus opinion.
saying that left handed blondes dont go to the big E and order a chowder on tuesdays is kind of ridiculous with a small sample size
Wow. There's no reason to do it right, but you're doing it wrong.In post 3714, pisskop wrote:I didnt, but ive just watched you and nancy waste oddles of pages on it. theres no reason to vca.In post 3712, Titus wrote:If you think my VCA is wrong, you're welcome to do your own. I'm not threatened by that.
Literally the first open I checked had scum-NaCl putting what was essentially the second vote (ignoring his self-vote) onto scum-Vorkuta in RVS.In post 3711, Titus wrote:If you think it's wrong go to the last few completed opens. RVS. See how many scum vote their partner in the second slot.
In post 25, Baezu wrote:
In post 3713, pisskop wrote:saying that left handed blondes dont go to the big E and order a chowder on tuesdays is kind of ridiculous
Okay, this better?In post 3721, Titus wrote:It was the third vote. Scum don't do the second vote. Changing facts doesn't work.