In post 3781, unwnd wrote:Unwnd, what gave you the idea about people lying about their role pm and stuff to their team? Because both you, Krazy and pops were all talking about the idea but as far as I know I'm the only person on a team that actually did a strategy of keeping some people unspoiled. I haven't looked at previous team mafia so I don't know if this seems to be something that actually happens often.
Everyone in our is saying they're town, myself included. We're operating under that pretense and have been. I didn't even consider lying (even if Krazy did) and didn't even really get the concept at first. My team is filled with people who enjoy winning so the pressure is double on me to perform and I have to tell them "sorry, feeling slightly demotivated and not important." I don't mean that in a melancholy way, It's just that it seems pretty hard to get a word in. Right now I sit pretty certain about a few things. I think this Pisskop wagon sucks, and especially from a set of fresh eyes. A lot of the arguments seem to pertain to what happened prior to my joining and associative of Pops, but me personally I think that is a useless endeavor given to Pops' (normally) erratic behavior. This remains true to how I sorta felt in Assassin's, and I was reading you as scum on an individual basis. It doesn't help that I thought Pops was town but in the back of my mind the mistake I made townreading her was believing a lot of her nonsense, which I think she uses as a crutch.
One thing that I can recall from this game is S_S saying he 0 opinion of me essentially and is now voting me? I don't understand where the sudden shift happened and if it did I would like a reasoning for it perhaps.
Hang on, to be clear on this, is it that your team is doing the policy where they say that they're town or your team is sharing role PMs with each other? Because first of all, those are 2 very different things. Secondly, if that is your strategy, why weren't you open with it in the first place and just told everyone?
UNVOTE:
Getting off Pisskop because I don't want a lynch until this question is resolved.
In post 3784, unwnd wrote:Titus' behavior has suddenly heightened in order to lynch Pisskop but I think where scum is down a mate the strategy is definitely not to be bold. I think if I happen to be wrong on Pisskop this could end up a good spew but the question remains if the same wagon happens in sorta the same fashion as Pops and truly is just a bingo? Like, I don't understand people talking about VCA and then not considering what is happening before their very eyes.
The strategy depends on where the scum are. I don't really have a problem with lynching many of the scummier slots in here and I don't even think I should be around for much longer myself. Not dying today, though. But scum should be bold if they are both in the general consensus for who's scummy. Scum have no need to do that yet if they're out of it, or even if one is sufficiently out of it.
In post 3812, Nancy Drew 39 wrote: In post 3681, NaCl wrote:Nancy, could you summarize your opinion on Titus and Pisskop? I want to make sure of where you stand.
For Titus is it "I think she's town but I don't trust her reads".
And for Pisskop it's "I think he's probably scum"?
Well she’s wrongly sr me, so is this a serious question? Yeah, when it comes to me, she’s being blind town.
I liked DDL’s case, based on his position on the wagon and his Eddie votes are the most suspicious, since Elsa only voted after Krazy made the “massive apology” post and Krazy was possibly omgussing.
I'm mostly confused by your reaction to Titus saying that Pisskop scum meant that you would be next, then you unvoted. Because whatever Titus said there shouldn't impact your read on Pisskop? And I don't see how you're stubbornly disagreeing with Titus while continuing to townread her for it regardless of what she says.
I wish DDL was posting more since he's going to die but I can hardly complain with me having the lowest posts.
I was going to say more stuff but I want an answer from unwnd first.