In post 1603, Espeonage wrote:I stand by my logic for not voting NSG. I think it was still sound in the grand scheme of things. Obviously hindsight is 20/20 and it is easy to look back and go Espe defended NSG the hardest, must be scum.
I present an interesting observation. Dann agreed with most of what I was saying in the latter half of Day 1, and now is spearheading my wagon for reasons previously he agreed with, or at least saw the logic in. That smells really bad from my PoV. I think Ceph is on the right track here. Unfortunately, this means that the FF/Dunn team I was dreaming of isn't likely to be a thing. Not impossible, but also unlikely.
Vote: Dann
The 180 read based on a flip when I approached the competing wagons from a purely information and logic standpoint feels telling to me.
I uh, never 180'd my read on you. I started feeling a little better about you when I was most sure that FF was scum, but I've been scum reading you since D1 and that hasn't changed.
I didn't agree with your reasons for not killing NSG. I think your reasons and the way you presented them were scummy, LAMIST, and not something I agreed with. I also made this clear D1. My reasons for initially not wanting NSG dead did not have to do with the fact that she was a lurker but the possibility she was town and what she could possible provide D2.
I feel like I made this distinction very clear in
#958 and you're trying to paint this as if I did a 180 in places I did not. Did I 180 wanting to kill NSG over FF? Yes, several times. Never did I change my mind on scum reading you and never did I agree with your reasoning on NSG.
