In post 1643, Dannflor wrote: In post 1642, Espeonage wrote:The point of your response was to argue that I didn't have a single logical explanation for voting FF over NSG
I don't think I ever said this? Please quote it if I did.
Look, I understand where you're coming from with lurkers being bad lynches. I don't think I ever said that logic specifically is incorrect. However, I disagreed with the way you used it to defend NSG originally because yes! a scum tell that usually fits her scum meta does raise her scum equity!
I am not ever going to let a meta based case sway me. I have too frequently seen this kind of shit abused including by myself. Ask Ducky if I am ever going to believe a meta argument? There is NO person's meta I would accept as the basis of a read and if anyone has any respect for anyone else's skill ceiling they wouldn't either.
even if it's wrong sometimes. You not entertaining that point and using the often repeated logic of needing a high information lynch D1 felt disingenuous to me.
And you would be wrong. Not using meta EVER is a hill I will die on
I agreed later because I'd felt my reasons for NSG scum had lessened and FF had become a much spicier lynch, but I digress. This feels like a semantics or language issue we're having because I thought I was always very clear it was the way you originally used that defense I took issue with. We were wagoning NSG and you popped in with "lurkers are bad lynches," which is not bad logic in theory, but felt like a LAMISTY attempt to discredit the wagon on her without even considering the valid point raised against her.
There was never a valid point raised on her. And when no one was even listening to my argument against lynching her, I explained the behind the scenes thinking for this exact stance and you agreed with it. They are the exact same argument, one is a one liner, the other is a four liner
I don't think I ever said you never had a reason to vote FF over NSG. That would in fact be very hypocritical. My issue with you has to do with the fact that you did (and are still) dismissing the issues with NSG as nothing, even though they were valid reasons to scum read her. Like your point about meta tells sometimes being different otherwise they would be a trust tell is silly because the logical conclusion to that as a dismissal is that we just shouldn't use meta at all.
See above. The hill I will die on. I am CERTAIN that there are people that will never ever use meta to defend or incriminate me because of how perfectly I can fake my scum game as town and how perfectly I can fake my town game as scum and I am not even close to being one of the best players at doing this.
You were treating NSG like any other lurker and boiling it down to "lurking lynches bad." Even though the case was deeper than that. There was a reason NSG got wagoned over another lurker like Dong.
I didn't agree with the reasons. Also people wanted to Lynch dong all day anyway.