Team Mafia 2020: Normal Game (Endgame)

[Iconeum]

When/if I flip town, lynch Mathblade then the lurker pile that I listed.

If you actually flip town, I will consider revisiting my Math read

[Iconeum]

No actually, like even a cop inno on MathBlade doesn't change the fact that the only path to victory in this game is to remove them from play because they're systematically destroying town's ability to lynch scum.

You miswrote RadiantCowbells

[MathBlade]

No actually, like even a cop inno on MathBlade doesn't change the fact that the only path to victory in this game is to remove them from play because they're systematically destroying town's ability to lynch scum.

You miswrote RadiantCowbells

Agreed. If RC flips town I will limit myself to geriatric rules unless directly asked a question.

We need to lower the post count.

[RadiantCowbells]

I mean, you're the only active scum contender so.

You have paid lip service to being willing to vote Plum/Shos repeatedly but you have never done so and have voted several different counterwagons.

[MathBlade]

I mean, you're the only active scum contender so.

You have paid lip service to being willing to vote Plum/Shos repeatedly but you have never done so and have voted several different counterwagons.

No there’s a lot. You just refuse to let anyone hunt them.

You flipped your shit when I tried to hunt Skitter. (Whom I now townread btw)

Hunting should be encouraged. Not drowned out.

[RadiantCowbells]

Like everyone in this game knows that Plum/Shos is scum at this point and you're still trying to lynch me because...?

No there’s a lot. You just refuse to let anyone hunt them.

You flipped your shit when I tried to hunt Skitter. (Whom I now townread btw)

Hunting should be encouraged. Not drowned out.

I discourage dumb people from putting the thread in a direction that has a 21% winrate.

[RadiantCowbells]

I mean, I still think it's plausible the 2 of you are SvS, I just think that Shos is the buddy and it's pretty easy to deal with later lol

[Iconeum]

I discourage dumb people from putting the thread in a direction that has a 21% winrate.

[Iconeum]

I mean, I still think it's plausible the 2 of you are SvS, I just think that Shos is the buddy and it's pretty easy to deal with later lol

[RadiantCowbells]

Like it's insane how impossible it is to get a Shos lynch when he's actively avoiding the thread and all his pop ins have been terrible.
How do you create a 21% winrate player? Have them perpetually push counterwagons to scum and never push scum.

This game has just been something else from the get go.

[RadiantCowbells]

I thought I was the team that didn't care about winning TM, heh.

[MathBlade]

Like everyone in this game knows that Plum/Shos is scum at this point and you're still trying to lynch me because...?

No there’s a lot. You just refuse to let anyone hunt them.

You flipped your shit when I tried to hunt Skitter. (Whom I now townread btw)

Hunting should be encouraged. Not drowned out.

I discourage dumb people from putting the thread in a direction that has a 21% winrate.

Assuming that’s true (it’s not especially if you include my other site) it’s a fallacy known as Gambler’s Fallacy.

It’s when you take prior occurances and then somehow apply them to a distinctly different event.

The reason that it gets its name is from slots or cards, where a gambler thinks they are “due” a win.

Or the slot machine is “lucky”.

The prior games and this are distinct events.

[Iconeum]

This game has just been something else from the get go.

[MathBlade]

Like it's insane how impossible it is to get a Shos lynch when he's actively avoiding the thread and all his pop ins have been terrible.
How do you create a 21% winrate player? Have them perpetually push counterwagons to scum and never push scum.

This game has just been something else from the get go.

Like it’s insane how impossible it is to get an Ari lynch when his posting has all been terrible and his only push has been on town.

This game has just been something else from the get go with you demanding we worship your win rate. I worship the fun rate.

[RadiantCowbells]

Assuming that’s true (it’s not especially if you include my other site) it’s a fallacy known as Gambler’s Fallacy.

It’s when you take prior occurances and then somehow apply them to a distinctly different event.

The reason that it gets its name is from slots or cards, where a gambler thinks they are “due” a win.

Or the slot machine is “lucky”.

The prior games and this are distinct events.

No, they're actually not. The quality of your play is not random chance. The quality of your play is determined by actions.
People's frequencies of correctly catching scum are actually generally pretty consistent.

[Iconeum]

I thought I was the team that didn't care about winning TM, heh.

[Iconeum]

I worship the fun rate.

[RadiantCowbells]

Like it’s insane how impossible it is to get an Ari lynch when his posting has all been terrible and his only push has been on town.

This game has just been something else from the get go with you demanding we worship your win rate. I worship the fun rate.

Your problem is that you think that you deserve to play town leader when you're a bad player.
Win rate wouldn't come into play if you wouldn't try to say that everyone must follow your reads and lynch your scumreads.

[RadiantCowbells]

I worship the fun rate.

Is losing games for no reason fun?

[Iconeum]

Your problem is that you think that you deserve to play town leader when you're a bad player.Win rate wouldn't come into play if you wouldn't try to say that everyone must follow your reads and lynch your scumreads.

[MathBlade]

Assuming that’s true (it’s not especially if you include my other site) it’s a fallacy known as Gambler’s Fallacy.

It’s when you take prior occurances and then somehow apply them to a distinctly different event.

The reason that it gets its name is from slots or cards, where a gambler thinks they are “due” a win.

Or the slot machine is “lucky”.

The prior games and this are distinct events.

No, they're actually not. The quality of your play is not random chance. The quality of your play is determined by actions.
People's frequencies of correctly catching scum are actually generally pretty consistent.

Then I have a 80+% chance of catching scum because on ToL I had an 80+% win rate.

See? No relevance. Even if you’re right.

It’s not apples to apples there’s a lot of moving parts.

And why are you so focused on shading my quality instead of the points:
>> You’re spamming the thread making it unbearable
>> Mathematically too many townreads. There cannot be one scum in a normal.
>> Anytime anyone does anything you disagree with you explode making it impossible to coordinate.

I have work and am going to bed.

[Iconeum]

Is losing games for no reason fun?

#MakeThisGameGreatAgain

We are going to do 2 things by lynching you

1)Making this game great again
2)Lynching scum

[RadiantCowbells]

Then I have a 80+% chance of catching scum because on ToL I had an 80+% win rate.

See? No relevance. Even if you’re right.

It’s not apples to apples there’s a lot of moving parts.

And why are you so focused on shading my quality instead of the points:
>> You’re spamming the thread making it unbearable
>> Mathematically too many townreads. There cannot be one scum in a normal.
>> Anytime anyone does anything you disagree with you explode making it impossible to coordinate.

I have work and am going to bed.

I mean. I have an 80%+ winrate and it's easy to see why. I don't believe you because you are bad at the game and that's really obvious to everyone here besides you.

[RadiantCowbells]

When/if I flip town, lynch Mathblade then the lurker pile that I listed.

If you actually flip town, I will consider revisiting my Math read

everyone should read this because it's important

[Iconeum]

I mean. I have an 80%+ winrate and it's easy to see why. I don't believe you because you are bad at the game and that's really obvious to everyone here besides you.

This game is a lot more fun if everyone would just answer RC with gifs