Mini Normal 2115: Fin

insomnia · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:19 am

UNVOTE:

Wimpy · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:20 am

no chill needed bro. he is scum. he claimed it remember?

Wimpy · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:21 am

hmm insomnia may be the third scum afterall

insomnia · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:21 am

Idgaf there's a third scum out there that is potentially escaping a day phase of inquiry.

p-edit I'm honestly just gonna shoot you.

ObviousScum · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:21 am

In post 843, Wimpy wrote:i still think you and looker can be scum. I will be happy with your lynch. I'd rather birdman but you are a good lynch. your reason to town read the neighbors doesn't hold much water so...

okay well I'm also a night 2 neap and a night 2 neapolitan being in a hood with 2 people would suggest that, given the incredibly limited power of a night 2 neapolitan, that the other two people in the hood are therefore town. Since they cannot be mechanically solved through what is (likely?) the only town investigative but inform the night 2 neapolitan that they cannot be investigated, thus making the only "false" guilty the neap will get being the vig

n2 neap + hood {cannot be innod} + hood {cannot be innod} + vig + {maybe one more town power?}
vs.
ascetic goon {can claim negative utility to avoid guilty} + goon + goon

ascetic goon with claimed negative utility + hooded scum would be too much power for scum, so setup spec given what we know strongly implies egix + looker are both town

ObviousScum · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:22 am

this is good tho because there's almost guaranteed to be no good protective in this setup so idgaf if you mislynch me, mislynch me, let scum kill me, I'm not alive tomorrow so I'm not going to be a problem

but assuming egix + looker flip scum after my flip because of 3-man hood = 1 must be scum logic and you will wrestle defeat from the jaws of victory in this game

Egix96 · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:23 am

In post 839, ObviousScum wrote:
In post 836, Wimpy wrote:
In post 833, ObviousScum wrote:Ame is wolfy
how is he wolfy?
He's persistently insisted that his entire solve is within OS+Egix+Looker. Presented with new information (3-man hood) that both undermines parts of his reasoning (associatives/subtext of the pair) and strongly suggests his full solve is not correct he immediately doubles down on his push with 0 reexamination or questions for clarification. That's the opposite of a town reaction and outside my threshold of a town tunnel

Also his EoD posts yesterday were awful and I was only giving him a pass because of his tone today so this is now a pattern of open wolfing

No, I don't buy this, based on #827 Ame thinks Looker and I are town now. To me it reads like you're cornered scum who's scrambling to get Ame lynched instead.

VOTE: ObviousScum

insomnia · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:23 am

Hold the fuck on

ObviousScum · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:23 am

sorry adrenaline pumping that sentence didn't really make sense

"assuming one out of egix + looker WILL flip scum after my flip because of 3 man hood logic" ... etc. etc.

insomnia · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:24 am

In post 856, Egix96 wrote:based on #827 Ame thinks Looker and I are town now.

So you are voting him because Ame thinks you guys are town? What do YOU think about looker?

Wimpy · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:24 am

In post 853, insomnia wrote:Idgaf there's a third scum out there that is potentially escaping a day phase of inquiry.

p-edit I'm honestly just gonna shoot you.

I already said please but i don't believe for a second you are vig. if so worst vig ever. You look like scum buddies to dead scum. Obv's predecessor looked like scum with frost, and obv comes in looking even more like scum and your reactions to him getting run up look like scum afraid to be alone.

either way I don't give a damn what you say you're going to do to me. I ain't afraid of you, I ain't afraid of nobody

Oblivious or bird man can die today, you would be a fine third option

Wimpy · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:26 am

STOP

insomnia · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:27 am

Thanks for playing with me here Wimpy, I just realised how people felt about me when I was playing here. Game changing experience.

Wimpy · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:28 am

scum neapolitan is also possible. claiming roles does not save you from the gallows.

ObviousScum · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:29 am

srs talk tho, suggestions for what to replace for 'c---' in the copypasta?

Ame · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:29 am

UNVOTE:

For somni

ObviousScum · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:30 am

In post 863, Wimpy wrote:scum neapolitan is also possible. claiming roles does not save you from the gallows.

yeah I know I figured I was gonna get lynched with this role. I thought about claiming bp but was worried that would mess up the setup spec on the hood. I do think n2 neap strongly implies two town in the hood. If I'm wrong on setup spec then I guess I'm wrong on Egix but I have a strong theory that he's town too.

Wimpy · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:30 am

In post 859, insomnia wrote:
In post 856, Egix96 wrote:based on #827 Ame thinks Looker and I are town now.
So you are voting him because Ame thinks you guys are town? What do YOU think about looker?

oblivious accused ame of doubling down on his scum reads of all the neighbors. clearly that didn't happen. i already pointed it out but that is what egix seems to be doing also.

how did you not pick that up?

Ame · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:32 am

In post 864, ObviousScum wrote:srs talk tho, suggestions for what to replace for 'c---' in the copypasta?

town, dudes, kids, chumps, party people

Chumps goes well with the scumbag theme

ObviousScum · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:32 am

In post 868, Ame wrote:Chumps goes well with the scumbag theme

solid nom, I might go with that

insomnia · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:33 am

I'm not really paying much attention, I'm burnt out. I gotta sleep.

profii · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:33 am

UNVOTE:
Need to reassess now

Wimpy · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:33 am

how about don't use copypasta whatever that is anyway

Wimpy · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:34 am

In post 871, profii wrote:UNVOTE:
Need to reassess now

what is their to reassess?

ObviousScum · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:35 am

In post 523, Ame wrote:VOTE: Chara

In post 527, Ame wrote:Lynching Chara brings now victories than lynching Aaron. Optimal game theory wise.

just saying, town is almost never THIS greedy

this is scum overreacting to aaron fakeclaiming and trying to regain control of the game

In post 715, Ame wrote:I don't have any back ups, no. I have a town read on everyone else. Your best option would be to push for profii or Macabre. Maybe wimpy? Insomnia and Luca are more or less cleared from the Aaron wagon. Honestly you replaced into quite a tough spot. (Also thank you for doing so and putting in the effort. It would have been cool to see you play from the beginning).

townreads ELA off one post and doesn't bother mentioning it after a direct ask for PoE

In post 710, Ame wrote:@Obvs https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11531677

Alch was vigged. Chara was killed for fake crumbing PR.

Thought he was town for this post but over-confidence on night action spec with 0 discussion feels weird to me too

OS dying words: ~This slot isn't town~

Later, the mod: "Ame flipped VT"

OS in graveyard: "Don't care, he's still scum"