Yes, but TMIIn post 7099, RCEnigma wrote:In the world you're considering right now. Which is that that I was blocked trying to kill RC.In post 7097, MathBlade wrote:Also start here when teacher complains about me scumreading his shadeIn post 6550, teacher wrote:Because you said this and it isn’t true. I’m a stickler for accuracy (hence my round and rounds with RC on overstating and whether something was a reversal or wasn’t). You’ve said similar things before, and it’s not accurate and this time I felt like pointing it out, while at the same time sharing that I thought the distinction was not substantive/impt.In post 6538, MathBlade wrote:Just L-1 teacher. As conf town I will have hammer so day ends when town wants.In post 6536, teacher wrote:I will vote as well. We have time to allow for a claim. Let’s get one.
intent to L-1 or hammer - whatever. Saud claim.
Doesn't that make Teachers statement and subsequent argument all true?
That’s like if 38 out of 39 hints point to X being town but what if you’re not? And the not is accurate, more likely than not the person had a reason.