Mini Normal 2115: Fin

Ame · Post Post #1450 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:20 pm

In post 1445, Luca Blight wrote:Does being on a mobile make you unable to answer basic questions?

No, but to rush someone, troll them, and then attempt to make it look like they logged off and aren't responding is unhelpful, and I consider it a bullying tactic.

My N1 will be apparent with flips one way or the other.

Mac's vote switch there seems weird.

insomnia · Post Post #1451 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:28 pm

who.is.your.night.one.

insomnia · Post Post #1452 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:30 pm

In post 1450, Ame wrote:My N1 will be apparent with flips one way or the other.

Ame · Post Post #1453 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:42 pm

Egixs 1361 is what made me think Looker was more likely than not to flip red. And it made me realize why you have had a strong TR on OS after hood claim and have thought I am her partner.

Ame · Post Post #1454 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:44 pm

Thanks for the [post] tag tip Egix! The real life pro tip is always in the comments.

insomnia · Post Post #1455 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:47 pm

In post 1361, Egix96 wrote:
In post 1356, Macabre wrote:The crimes of the hedgehog are now more apparent than ever, and the method of their execution will be the rope. Death!

VOTE: ObviousScum
You don't trust insom's read on him?

this?

Ame · Post Post #1456 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:50 pm

I don't know who the last scum would be though since Mac is claiming vig. Wimpy maybe? I remember him scum reading Looker for a reason that wasn't there. (I'm pretty sure he had her as the scummiest for it). And then abandoned the read when I asked him about it. Seems strange for someone as efficient as Wimpy.

Ame · Post Post #1457 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:53 pm

In post 1455, insomnia wrote:
In post 1361, Egix96 wrote:
In post 1356, Macabre wrote:The crimes of the hedgehog are now more apparent than ever, and the method of their execution will be the rope. Death!

VOTE: ObviousScum
You don't trust insom's read on him?
this?

Yeah it made think ohhh he's a watcher or something and saw Looker visit the nk which explains his readlist where he put her at the bottom. And before the hood claim OS and Looker could be partners, but after so, not. Thus OS is town for him. And I'm pushing OS and have Looker as unlike scum

insomnia · Post Post #1458 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:56 pm

In post 1456, Ame wrote:I don't know who the last scum would be though since Mac is claiming vig

where'd he claim vig?

Ame · Post Post #1459 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:58 pm

He crummed it a few times. 1 sec.

Ame · Post Post #1460 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:06 am

In post 957, Macabre wrote:The One-eye would not try to kill me, but this crow cannot share the same sentiment for the dead-eye. Mourn!

Hinting that he killed Chara. Which makes sense as he was scum reading them yesterDay.

In post 790, Macabre wrote:
In post 689, Ame wrote:Caw! Caw?
This scarf boy lassos the post believed to explain the death of One-eye. Could this solve the mystery so easily? Wonder!

Referring to my post where I stated Chara was the NK. He's saying to question that.

In post 1268, Macabre wrote:The hedgehog almost certainly must die. The means is not yet determined. Free will!

Hinting that if OS isn't the lynch, he will Vig him.

In post 1356, Macabre wrote:The crimes of the hedgehog are now more apparent than ever, and the method of their execution will be the rope. Death!

VOTE: ObviousScum

Changing his mind after profii claim and preferring the lynch.

Looker · Post Post #1461 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:12 am

I've been playing against my wincon. I didn't bookmark the scum chat and thought I was just a town neighbor. I'm sorry, man. What does TMI mean? I can try to distance as much as I can.

Looker · Post Post #1462 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:13 am

Disregard the last part it's wifom

Looker · Post Post #1463 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:14 am

You don't need a long night when it's just you anyway

insomnia · Post Post #1464 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:14 am

@Wimpy

Zzz...

Mac, you know who to shoot bud, your secret admirer

insomnia · Post Post #1465 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:15 am

Looker, TMI means too much information. It speaks about the scum mentality, they are informed, town are uninformed.

Looker · Post Post #1466 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:16 am

Stop confusing me and stick to one

insomnia · Post Post #1467 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:17 am

What do you mean

insomnia · Post Post #1468 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:17 am

TMI = too much information

Scum have too much information, they are informed.

Looker · Post Post #1469 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:18 am

Sorry makes so much sense now

Looker · Post Post #1470 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:19 am

Gobble will probably flip this in a week

insomnia · Post Post #1471 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:19 am

but which post were you referencing with the tmi thing?

insomnia · Post Post #1472 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:19 am

you can do the flip for us and I promise we'll go to sleep lol

Ame · Post Post #1473 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:23 am

In post 1461, Looker wrote:I've been playing against my wincon. I didn't bookmark the scum chat and thought I was just a town neighbor. I'm sorry, man. What does TMI mean? I can try to distance as much as I can.

insomnia · Post Post #1474 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:23 am

I can give you an example :

Your scum hunting (not really scum hunting cuz you have to pretend you're scum hunting) was made more under the assumption that "I will check this out for posterity at some point" which says "I don't need this right now, but it might turn out to be useful later" and, therefore, you aren't hunting, you're just laying the foundation for your traps and future accusations based on it. So you know the roles of everyone.

Your constant pressure votes on people and then revoting were really fake to me, because, on the one hand, you're saying "I have reasons for voting this and I'm gonna catch someone off this" and then you just unvote for no reason. That tells me you had TMI on that person, wanted to act as if you were on to something, but you switching your vote for nothing says "I didn't actually have anything for voting them"

It was a really objective stance and no scum hunting, really.

Hope you can take something out of that.