Titus v. Alisae (endgame)

Alisae · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:43 pm

In post 372, Sherlock and Watson wrote:
@mod please update op on rules for acceptable font sizes

-s

Alisae · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:44 pm

In post 374, Chemist1422 wrote:here you go ali

Spoiler:

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay

Titus · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:44 pm

In post 324, Sherlock and Watson wrote:*Ascetic commuting mason with factional nightkill of course

-S

Hey! That's my role...minus the factional nightkill.

Alisae · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:44 pm

btw in HS apparently people saw me is annoying
I cannot possibly understand how they saw me this way
I really just wanted to be friendly =(

Alisae · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:46 pm

Did you know that in person, I could not say a word, or am very talkative (I'm actually very introverted) but on the internet, I can talk
and talk
and talk
and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

and talk

Maki and Kaito · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:46 pm

In post 354, Ankamius wrote: what?

What about our read on your slot?

In post 361, Espeonage wrote:I would go so far as to say I would be very surprised if I am not the strongest town PR in the game INCLUDING if a mason has a PR.

So why are you claiming day 1 unprompted?
You don't have to answer that.

In post 357, Espeonage wrote:There is a world where it is in my best interested for pine to die today but it depends how good I am at picking targets tonight.

Stop trying to "control the game" please -- if it doesn't matter who dies today for your role then let us do our thing. Nobody is going to want to listen to you when you're like this

In post 362, Sherlock and Watson wrote:K&M did you two switch heads for this game?

-S

No... I can make good posts when I want to.

---

Alisae · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:46 pm

titus can vouch for that
I don't think I really say anything if much at all in person

Titus · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:46 pm

In post 339, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 333, Espeonage wrote:Just throwing it out there. Maybe Pine doesn't have to die.
*nods*

That's the point of this question I believe.

Titus, please get to thinking about what % of the game has to be ascetic for taking a mislynch to be the optimal course of action. If we come below that bar, we get a free extra probtown/do not worry about this slot until lylo paranoia.

-Cerb

Request noted, but I think that answer changes based on other setup things I don't know.

Hectic · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:47 pm

this is a crumb which no one will see until i point it out later
i am a mason with Sherlock but not Watson

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:47 pm

I thought you talked slightly above average frequency when we played lol that one time

-s

Alisae · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:47 pm

In post 383, Hectic wrote:
this is a crumb which no one will see until i point it out later
i am a mason with Sherlock but not Watson

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT

Alisae · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:47 pm

NO WAY

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:48 pm

I nearly just snorted my margarita lol

-s

Alisae · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:48 pm

In post 384, Sherlock and Watson wrote:I thought you talked slightly above average frequency when we played lol that one time

-s

on in person I'm completely different!

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:48 pm

In post 125, Bitmap wrote:Ok just carry me in main thread.

This is interesting. Is there some kind of running gag going on here, or did everyone just walk past this without noticing?

In post 151, Chemist1422 wrote:I do have some thoughts about how we should be handling the masonry but I'll hold onto them until they become relevant

This seemed like it was important until later on the thread devolved into a huge mess of people putting out mason signals to obfuscate. Which got me thinking about why that happened when it happened instead of straightaway. Which made me keep this MQ in because ... there had to be a reason the super obfuscation came flying in. YMMV of course, but for those trying to keep track of what is important in all this shit posting.

In post 317, Pine wrote:Also, because I need to die early, I will be TRYHARDING this game. I am caught up. I will remain caught up. I will take at least one scum with me and give Titus (may she reign forever) the tools to eviscerate the rest

This is my first opportunity to be non-scum in one of these games and I will DO IT UP

There's so much to unpack in this. I'm quoting it so I will remember to come back to it later.

In post 347, Espeonage wrote:M&K and Pine are gonna wish they had both shut up when I inevitably flip n2.

Seems like a cat out of the bag moment, but if it makes you feel better I'm pretty sure the scums probably noticed how you reacted to Cerb claiming our NU. If anything the fact that they called attention to it maybe helps put a light on their motives?

-------------------------

Some thoughts at this juncture:

1.) Y'all can't keep doing this shit in the thread or there's no way I'm going to be able to engage. Took me almost an hour to read through all that bullshit for a few worthwhile nuggets. I really don't have the time for that shit. I'll be heading in to work in about an hour and I can't access the game while I work. Then I have to sleep again. You see where that will go. Please let me play. Stop the Shitposting™!

2.) I feel like I had more thoughts but Pine coming in derailed them.

3.) Titus why the hell didn't you draft us? Like ... you wanted to make it hard or something?

~D

P-Edit: Oh fuck off with that shit Ali.

P-Edit2: LOL at Espeonage thinking they can quick wagon us. Thanks for that laugh. If you're seriously town RN I'm gonna have a hell of a go at you post game. Just get your big boy pants on and be ready for it.

P-Edit3: I found a crumb!

Alisae · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:48 pm

Also I think you were also very talkative and I just went along with it.

Maki and Kaito · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:48 pm

In post 370, Espeonage wrote:Upon thinking more I am happy to just kill pine today because it may help me.

So many RC fanboys in this game.

---

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:49 pm

In post 383, Hectic wrote:
this is a crumb which no one will see until i point it out later
i am a mason with Sherlock but not Watson

~W

Alisae · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:49 pm

In post 389, Reasonably Rational wrote:1.) Y'all can't keep doing this shit in the thread or there's no way I'm going to be able to engage. Took me almost an hour to read through all that bullshit for a few worthwhile nuggets. I really don't have the time for that shit. I'll be heading in to work in about an hour and I can't access the game while I work. Then I have to sleep again. You see where that will go. Please let me play. Stop the Shitposting™!

https://voca.ro/4dmLktDbCUm

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:49 pm

In post 382, Titus wrote:
In post 339, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 333, Espeonage wrote:Just throwing it out there. Maybe Pine doesn't have to die.
*nods*

That's the point of this question I believe.

Titus, please get to thinking about what % of the game has to be ascetic for taking a mislynch to be the optimal course of action. If we come below that bar, we get a free extra probtown/do not worry about this slot until lylo paranoia.

-Cerb
Request noted, but I think that answer changes based on other setup things I don't know.

Can I encourage you for a little bit of hypothetical on this? We talked about this quite a lot in our slack since he made that post and even just some hypothetical spitballing could help with establishing probabilities I think.

~D

Alisae · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:50 pm

I actually did not realize how loud that was until I listened too it
woops, I didn't mean to blow off someone's eardrums

Titus · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:50 pm

In post 349, Ankamius wrote:
In post 329, Pine wrote:
In post 325, Spiffeh wrote:I would have claimed ascetic in my first post if I were ascetic

Therefore, I am not

Pine I am excited for you to try hard

Tell me who the scum are
I believe this post.

Current scumlist: Ankamius and Sherlock/Watson

Ank would have been VERY high on Ali's recruit list, probably #1

Ali never drafts FL or I
I am very confused why I would be very high on Alisae's recruit list. The only thing I can think of is to stop me from being town, but that's not exactly a hard thing to fix considering e can just nightkill me night one.

---

If Ali and I were reversed, you'd be my first scum pick tbh. Low usual draft, years of scum history together.

Most everyone has a good reason to be scum here.

Titus · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:57 pm

In post 389, Reasonably Rational wrote:3.) Titus why the hell didn't you draft us? Like ... you wanted to make it hard or something?

I can't pick the people Ali picks, plus random left over. I expect you to FoS the masons by day 2.

Titus · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 4:02 pm

In post 394, Reasonably Rational wrote:Can I encourage you for a little bit of hypothetical on this? We talked about this quite a lot in our slack since he made that post and even just some hypothetical spitballing could help with establishing probabilities I think.

I like that but it's too early. Both you and Pine are good for 2 days.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2020 4:03 pm

In post 397, Titus wrote:
In post 389, Reasonably Rational wrote:3.) Titus why the hell didn't you draft us? Like ... you wanted to make it hard or something?
I can't pick the people Ali picks, plus random left over. I expect you to FoS the masons by day 2.

Why on earth would I want to do that? There has been such brilliant obfuscation... why point them back out?

~D