Newbie 1984 - Game Over
Forum rules
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Town at top
DK
DP
DJS
Hectic
R1, Natsu
Luca
AC
Scum at bot
DK - p41 where he dislikes DP's annoying gimmicks, agree with his read of AC's scummy p49
DP - genuinely feel like he is trying to game solve amongst the gimmicky fluff
DJS - Null tell, all round NAI posts pretty much. I don't see DJS's vote on the wagon as scummy, but rather mostly NAI, if anything towny. That vote would be an ultra ballsy/gambity move as scum. From the game i played with DJS, i just dont feel like that's a move he would make as scum
Hectic - finding it very hard to read him. Like him posting his reads of players, but simply disagree with some of the reads. Undecided at this stage.
R1 – p111 jumping on board the anti-pikachu sentiment
P114 – being hypocritical – essentially nitpicking about DPs nitpicking
Natsu - p95 I got a bad vibe off the post, rubbed me the wrong way, seemed a bit disingenuous
Luca - fluff galore, lurking, d\basically doing squat for an SE-rank player. Buddying up / brown-nosing players in p81 and p82
Arthur - p45 where he oddly dislikes reads - sitting on the fence and hedging your bets is scummy. Posting reads is pro-town, no matter how early. Scummy post.
- doesn;t really care about 5 other players, doesnt ask why for example i am green at the top of DPS RVS stage reads. Seems mainly interested about himself ---- scummy.
- p49: scummy post, see DK's analysis
- p61: No order to 5 players? All equal in rank? Just seems weird to me, that 5 players can all be on the same level of town-scum. Why post a town-scum scale if there is no scale? O.o- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
If you thought that AC post was scummy, then hop onto the shiny AC lynch trainIn post 188, ROUND ONE wrote:
oh thatIn post 49, ArthurConyl wrote:Woah woah we're at L-1 already and just woke up in the morning.
DP is obviously either scum or not a great player. This is probably the same with Hectic. The thing is they both seem so authentically mediocre that I would be impressed with any scum managing to fake play the way they do. I'm happy with policy lynches not on D1 and definitely not on the first day of D1. I also have reason to suspect at least one of the wagoners of being mafia. This is a very common tactic that mafia use - getting town to vote for the bad players instead of scum. Analysing the wagoners on Hectic.
Spoiler:
@ROUND ONE, your post appears to be fairly non-suspect, you simply voted for him because you felt he was a bad player, although I personally wouldn't have gone so far as to vote for him.
I felt that was completely unnecessary and faking contribution- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Jack of All Trades
- Luca Blight
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9939
- Joined: December 21, 2013
You’ve missed the point - Pikachu is scumreading me for not solving during the RVS phase. Until my argument with him a few hours ago, I hadn’t posted since RVS.In post 274, 72offsuit wrote:
I'm pretty sure we have moved past RVS - my definition of RVS phase anyway. Players have stated FoSes and have switched votes.In post 259, Luca Blight wrote:
Based entirely on RVS posts, which is what I said before.In post 258, Detective Pikachu wrote:
0 solvingIn post 256, Luca Blight wrote:Why are you scumreading me, then?
There is now some, yes limited, but some material to go off now- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
thonkIn post 199, Hectic wrote:Mostly for 28 tbh. I agree with most of the thoughts in 184, but maybe I'm being buddyed. He just hasn't done anything wrong so far. What don't you like?
so you did read that I completely forgot but still asked me why
interesting
its not ai in any way, but still- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
^^^^^^
the longest day length ive ever played before this was 120hrs
this is like double- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
game always begins day 2In post 209, Detective Pikachu wrote:I've loathed day 1s ever since boon fake claimed masons with my scumread (who was scum), second scum claimed gunsmith, third scum claimed doctor, and I was vig
like there's no way to effectively evaluate claims
scum are always dragged to l-1 and then wagon dissolves and people townread them because "blah blah wagon analysis"
imo game begins day 2 unless the player list is like extraordinarily easy to read
day 1 is the pl/vote analysis lynch imo
also town fakeclaiming masons with scum is the best part of mafia wdym- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
why are you asking to dieIn post 222, Natsu wrote:Cool, I'm not here to join any townblocks. I'm guessing that's some kind of town clique? Seems more like building your own tomb.- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
oh if I wasnt voted and it was L-1 I wouldve totally quickhammered for shits and gigglesIn post 226, Hectic wrote:
Arthur, why are you concerned about mafia quickhammering here? Isn't it fine for me to die if you can lynch the mafia who hammered me the next day?In post 50, ArthurConyl wrote:Since you seem like a reasonable player, would mind unvoting so mafia can't quickhammer?
Ignoring the fact Pikachu may have quickhammered as town.- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
yeah it seems like everywhere is like that nowadaysIn post 230, Detective Pikachu wrote:Actually executing policy lynches on this site is tantamount to impossible
but all you have to do is believe- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
answered a bad question with a bad answer.In post 237, Luca Blight wrote:
I’m above such things.In post 103, Hectic wrote:Why aren't you answering the RQS, Arthur and Luca?
I can't tell if thats what you meant or youre just blatant scum at this point
[Hectic,Luca]
the detective is town because they are like almost never scum with hectic- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
correctIn post 238, Luca Blight wrote:
This is a baseless assertion.In post 105, Detective Pikachu wrote:
Because at least one of them rolled scum and possibly bothIn post 103, Hectic wrote:Why aren't you answering the RQS, Arthur and Luca?- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
oh youre actually trying to not die now I seeIn post 239, Luca Blight wrote:
Frozen scum?In post 195, Detective Pikachu wrote:
like, ok so the second part is literally just copy pasting the OP and taking out the three people he has reads onIn post 61, ArthurConyl wrote:Conclusions so far (from town to scum):
==========
Everyone else (no order):
Natsu - would be more comfortable if you didn't put Hectic at L-2
DkKoba
72offsuit
ArthurConyl
ROUND ONE
Luca Blight (SE)
if so, a) why start by saying it's town to scum
b) why copy paste the names you're not sorting
c) why keep your own name in the list?
that being said Luca still looks more like frozen scum to me than this, this is more baffling to me than objectively scummy
You seem to be rushing a read on me based entirely on RVS play, and it seems disingenuous tbh.
this too is very true
noted- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
falseIn post 245, Detective Pikachu wrote:Mmmm mmmm it can be
I think scum are more likely to pick pointless fights thinking it will make them seem townie- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
why do you vote now instead of when you first read him as scum earlier?In post 252, Luca Blight wrote:This is what I mean by ‘forced’ - your read on me feels entirely rushed and fabricated.
You say I’m scum for not answering RQS - I ask why is it scummy, you said because scum sometimes pick fights. I ask ‘was I picking a fight by not answering them’ you’re like ‘not really, but you’re scummy for no socializing and not laid back’.
So you’re moving the goalposts, can’t explain what you even mean by socializing in this context, and SR me for not being laid back, which is normal for someone who is being attacked?
I like my vote here for now.
VOTE: Pikachu- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
falseIn post 257, Detective Pikachu wrote:Hmm natsu, arthur, and luca all have cognitive load but only 2 are scum
Still ok with luca/arthur for the moment tho- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
notice how his scumreads are the people hectic called out for absolutely no reasonIn post 265, Detective Pikachu wrote:
BIn post 105, Detective Pikachu wrote:
Because at least one of them rolled scum and possibly bothIn post 103, Hectic wrote:Why aren't you answering the RQS, Arthur and Luca?
This is not saying you're scum because you didn't answer rqs, it's saying you didn't answer rqs because you're scum. And it was also half joking
interesting- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
the longer the days, the harder town tends to lose wimIn post 269, 72offsuit wrote:
No sense to rush, the more time spent discussing the better. Dangle that noose for scum to slip their neck through.In post 122, ROUND ONE wrote:
yeah, majority is a thing I knowDetective Pikachu wrote:Its a maximum not a requirement
the issue is people tend to not want to hammer unless its further through the game or late game- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
I didnt really have much to say at the time about him except thatIn post 271, 72offsuit wrote:
Don't really like this post - after DK has voiced annoyance at DP's gimmicky postingIn post 111, ROUND ONE wrote:*yawn* dp is condescending as fuck god
and AC has criticised DP's town-to-scum-scale based off his RVS reads
- drumming up anti-pikachu vibes rather than pointing out any scummyness
and it had to be known to him
because reality check- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
in the post, spoilered is the hectic post arthur was talking aboutIn post 278, 72offsuit wrote:
If you thought that AC post was scummy, then hop onto the shiny AC lynch trainIn post 188, ROUND ONE wrote:
oh thatIn post 49, ArthurConyl wrote:Woah woah we're at L-1 already and just woke up in the morning.
DP is obviously either scum or not a great player. This is probably the same with Hectic. The thing is they both seem so authentically mediocre that I would be impressed with any scum managing to fake play the way they do. I'm happy with policy lynches not on D1 and definitely not on the first day of D1. I also have reason to suspect at least one of the wagoners of being mafia. This is a very common tactic that mafia use - getting town to vote for the bad players instead of scum. Analysing the wagoners on Hectic.
Spoiler:
@ROUND ONE, your post appears to be fairly non-suspect, you simply voted for him because you felt he was a bad player, although I personally wouldn't have gone so far as to vote for him.
I felt that was completely unnecessary and faking contribution- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE Goon
- ROUND ONE
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: February 3, 2020
tl;dr - scum is within {dsjstr
Natsu
DkKoba
72offsuit
ArthurConyl
ROUND ONE
Hectic (SE)
Detective Pikachu (SE)
Luca Blight (SE)
}
Town
Me
Arthur
72
Null (top is town-null,bottom is scumnull)
DK
Natsu
Scumreads
Luca
DP
Hectic
Naturally im sure the nullreads are town *for now*, but in a case I had to lynch between them id pick Natsu- ROUND ONE
-
ROUND ONE
- Natsu
-
Natsu Goon
- Natsu
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 321
- Joined: January 4, 2016
The interplay between Hectic and Pikachu has been sending off alarms in my head. I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed it. I guess it's because all the SE's have played with each other before. Pikachu is really reaching in most of his scumreads, and seems to be crafting narratives out of nothing.In post 293, ROUND ONE wrote:
notice how his scumreads are the people hectic called out for absolutely no reasonIn post 265, Detective Pikachu wrote:
BIn post 105, Detective Pikachu wrote:
Because at least one of them rolled scum and possibly bothIn post 103, Hectic wrote:Why aren't you answering the RQS, Arthur and Luca?
This is not saying you're scum because you didn't answer rqs, it's saying you didn't answer rqs because you're scum. And it was also half joking
interesting
@72offsuit, honestly look at Pikachu's iso and tell me how on earth you see it as being a townread? He looks like a sharper version of my scum partner from last game. - Natsu
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- ROUND ONE
- Luca Blight
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit