so why are you watching it?In post 1023, Alisae wrote:like I am having a really hard time trying to get through all of this
-S
so why are you watching it?In post 1023, Alisae wrote:like I am having a really hard time trying to get through all of this
boredIn post 1025, Sherlock and Watson wrote:so why are you watching it?In post 1023, Alisae wrote:like I am having a really hard time trying to get through all of this
-S
What are the 6 other posts?In post 1020, Sherlock and Watson wrote:I would add these to the reasons I want to lynch bitmap, bringing the total number of posts I want to lynch him for up to 9 total.
-S
In post 766, AaronFrost wrote:In post 657, gobbledygook wrote:I think Pine is scum for this ascetic enabling business.Can both of you explain your stance on this? I could maybe see it coming from scum if he had claimed it unprompted but there were two ascetic claims before Pine's post, which probably triggered his claim in the first place.In post 652, Maki and Kaito wrote:Why is Pine such a townread for peeps? I think his play is pretty bad for reasons I outlined before.
I mean, perhaps, but we don't know if the town even has direct investigativesIn post 1031, gobbledygook wrote:Kill Pine to make people not ascetic. We have already had one ascetic claim that he was a powerful role, so to allow a protective to cover that role, Pine needs to go.
Moreover, so other roles can investigate them.
There’s also the fact that I saw Pine scum do a day 1 partial massclaim, so I have reason to doubt his intentions here.In post 1032, Sherlock and Watson wrote:I mean, perhaps, but we don't know if the town even has direct investigativesIn post 1031, gobbledygook wrote:Kill Pine to make people not ascetic. We have already had one ascetic claim that he was a powerful role, so to allow a protective to cover that role, Pine needs to go.
Moreover, so other roles can investigate them.
maybe it's ALL MASONS and then 3 vigs!
I mean probably not but saying we should lynch a slot off day 1 setup spec seems weaksauce
for all we know scum have 3 different roleblockers and people are ascetic so that they can have night action results
like we can't just presume that the ascetic enabler is exclusively pro-scum based on day 1 setup info
-S
I do agree that Pine should die at some point as his role strongly points to there being a scum ascetic but what reasons does scum!Pine have to claim that? If he's scum and all ascetic claims are town, then that strongly helps out town if he dies and it's even worse if there's a scum ascetic on his side. Pine is also hinting that there's more to his role than just being ascetic enabler.In post 1031, gobbledygook wrote:Someone else asked if my suspicion on Pine is role related or claim related. For me, it is both.
Kill Pine to make people not ascetic. We have already had one ascetic claim that he was a powerful role, so to allow a protective to cover that role, Pine needs to go.
Moreover, so other roles can investigate them.
I also have claim related reason to think what Pine did is bad. I think it narrows the pool down for who can be a power role or not. Pine said his role requires him to die for towns benefit. And as such he’s going to try hard. He shouldn’t need to claim and get all of that info in order to try and get killed. Claiming he is an enabler IF there is a scum ascetic just means scum are NOT going to kill him.
I'm not critiquing you for confidence, I'm critiquing you for confidence *on those slots*, which consists of almost half my PoE. That makes it feel like you're not so much in "bad reads" territory as "scum agenda" territory but who knows, it's still earlyIn post 1038, Bitmap wrote:Actually Sherlock, I know for a fact that you've seen players that have been even more overtly confident than me in their reads this early on in other games that ended up being town (RE: Magical Girls).
So I think your reasoning is kind of bad.
That's fine, whatever. I'm saying that confidence is not AI especially this early in the game and PoEs will conflict especially with players that are hot heads.In post 1042, Sherlock and Watson wrote:Also I think I've been clear that I did not actually read the vast majority of HoS nor do I care to reread it so not sure why you're saying I should remember something from it
-S
So you're just not reading the thread at all then?In post 1045, gobbledygook wrote:So your vote from page 4 came from a single post that Bitmap made, and you’ve barely advocated for more support for his lynch. I don’t like the looks of that.
In post 97, Sherlock and Watson wrote:[Read reserved for 3 days, 4 hours, 54 minutes - Ankamius]