Micro 918: Doggos Among Us [TOWN WIN]!

[Espeonage]

Hey, had other stuff taking my attention.

[Espeonage]

So considering that drew got replaced I think that there's still about zero to go on for why clidd has/had such a hard on for that lynch.

[Hectic]

@mod: V/LA until the 10th.

Though I'll probably have to make an exception here.

[clidd]

I do not believe that the entry of Looker will change radically my view.

[clidd]

Of course, we can argue about some points that I made prematurely in my read (and possibly change), but his slot, specifically, I don't intend to change.

[clidd]

I think Espeonage should hammer Looker. The disappearance act so close to deadline isn't great.
Why those 3 as scum, Looker?

He has a strong alibi, i checked.

[clidd]

So, Dsjstr lynched with Looker hammering or the opposite ? @AaronFrost

[AaronFrost]

What I don't understand is why DJ is more likely to be scum than Norway, Espeo, or Clidd. (I thought I repped into this D3, but it's just D1.) I like Clidd's posting, but that's playstyle, not alignment. I also like democratically choosing the D1 hammer to make the most of it. I'm not getting what's differentiating DJ from anyone else. I'm fond of AaronFrost, though, so there's sheep potential.

Just his entire ISO. There's a serious lack of sorting from him as well as being engrossed in getting the wolves to 'slip up' which doesn't feel genuine to me.

You replaced into a slot that lurked and people wanted to lynch so if you could make your alignment obvious that'd be cool

[AaronFrost]

So, Dsjstr lynched with Looker hammering or the opposite ? @AaronFrost

dsjstr lynched, Looker hammers

[clidd]

VOTE: Dsjstr

[Looker]

I think those four are equally suspicious. Norway could be protecting Clidd, and-

i lost my train of thought. I like that Espeo called Norway out on the 'only town would hammer' narrative. I'm not seeing what y'all are going off of. You accused me of doing RVS on page 22 but that's all I'm reading is RVS. It's playstyle confliction and setup/game mechanic spec. If DJ is scum, then hold me accountable for not voting him, but I'm just not seeing it. I don't mean to offend the "town leaders" of Clidd and AaronFrost.

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

I think DJ or Clidd should hammer that.

[NorwegianboyEE]

Disappointing.

[NorwegianboyEE]

If i’m ‘protecting’ Clidd, why would you want him to hammer me? Having two people you see as a potential team hammer one another is bad playing. If we’re both town then we lost the game. You should put two independently scummy individuals to hammer one of the other. That’s the best play here. Your suggestion is anti-town and scummy.

[NorwegianboyEE]

So, Dsjstr lynched with Looker hammering or the opposite ? @AaronFrost

dsjstr lynched, Looker hammers

I mostly like the "Looker hammers" part.

[NorwegianboyEE]

VOTE: Dsjstr
If Looker hammers this i’m ok with it.
It’s L-1

[Looker]

Why would I want town to hammer town?

[NorwegianboyEE]

Because that’s what scum wants.

[AaronFrost]

Why would I want town to hammer town?

I have no idea what you're seeing in town dsj and you seem way too confident in that read for me to be comfortable with.

Please hammer. If you don't, then I'll have the third scummiest player in my list hammer and if dsj flips scum then we're powerlynching you tomorrow.

[Looker]

If i’m ‘protecting’ Clidd, why would you want him to hammer me? Having two people you see as a potential team hammer one another is bad playing. If we’re both town then we lost the game. You should put two independently scummy individuals to hammer one of the other. That’s the best play here. Your suggestion is anti-town and scummy.

• You say it's bad playing, but that's the strategy you're proposing with DJ - I'm just substituting him with someone who hasn't been ganged up on
  
• How would you lose the game if you were both town? The rules say only wolves commit suicide.

If you want to "powerlynch" me for having a difference of opinion, then fine - go for it. Were you supposed to intimidate me? My lack of confidence is what I'm pushing; I don't believe there's enough evidence on DJ for there to be this much confidence that he's scum. And I read all 22 pages of these shenanigans.

The best play would be to draw associative for who's opposing who's lynch - I'm comfortable with opposing DJ's.

[NorwegianboyEE]

The best play would be to draw associative for who's opposing who's lynch - I'm comfortable with opposing DJ's.

Is it safe to assume we can draw an association between you and Dsjstr based on your logic?

[Looker]

I'm comfortable with opposing DJ's.

[clidd]

Votecount 1.8

dsjstr

- AaronFrost (L-3)

Hectic

- (0)

Looker

- Hectic (L-3)

NorwieganboyEE

- Espeonage(L-3)

AaronFrost

- (0)

Espeonage

- (0)

Clidd

- dsjstr (L-3)

Not Voting: NorwieganboyEE, Clidd, Looker- (3)

With 7 Players alive it takes 4 to lynch.
Deadline is (expired on 2020-02-11 01:00:00)

*Looker has replaced Doctor Drew.
*Espeonage has been prodded.
*I'm making a youtube video about EDM, so pm me if that's your jam. Or if you dislike it for any reason. I need opinions from both.

Better not to engage in a clash now.

[clidd]

So, I propose three scenarios for today:

1°

Looker agrees and hammers Dsjstr

2°

Norwegian and Aaron vote on Looker and I, personally, take responsibility for hammering him. Or,

3°

most radical scenario: I unvote, Looker votes Dsjstr and I, again, take responsibility to hammer.

[clidd]

Anyway, if indecision remains in this lynch, I intend to adopt one of the scenarios above, considering the absence of Hectic, Espeonage and the lack of collaboration from Dsjstr.

[clidd]

What I don't understand is why DJ is more likely to be scum than Norway, Espeo, or Clidd. (I thought I repped into this D3, but it's just D1.) I like Clidd's posting, but that's playstyle, not alignment. I also like democratically choosing the D1 hammer to make the most of it. I'm not getting what's differentiating DJ from anyone else. I'm fond of AaronFrost, though, so there's sheep potential.

'' I also like democratically choosing the D1 hammer ''

So you don't mind about three players wanting you to hammer, right ?