Titus v. Alisae (endgame)

Alisae · Post Post #1700 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:24 pm

In post 1699, Amrun wrote:
In post 1686, Sherlock and Watson wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 1685, Amrun wrote:Liking Ank’s reads list on page 37.

In post 1577, Ankamius wrote:the fundamental thing is that my stated reads list was literally RNGed.

-S
Haven’t gotten there yet. Do not like this, though. Why RNG? Weird.

Anything is weird when you take the quote completely out of context

Alisae · Post Post #1701 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:24 pm

I mean afterall
anything is possible when you lie

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #1702 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:33 pm

In post 1698, Bitmap wrote:I like Watson better.

u wanna fite?

-S

AaronFrost · Post Post #1703 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:44 pm

In post 1559, Bitmap wrote:Am I the only one that likes Boon's recent posts?

Why do you like them?

AaronFrost · Post Post #1704 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:51 pm

In post 1596, Bitmap wrote:I can't read Hectic so someone fill me in.

The only game I played with him was when I was on my alt for Undertale and I just really wanted to lynch him for the weird things he did as town.

As many games as I've played with Hectic (I've lost count as this point) I feel like I should be able to read him decently well, but I've never seen his scum play firsthand. Most of the gimmicky stuff is NAI for him.

AaronFrost · Post Post #1705 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:57 pm

In post 1600, OkaPoka wrote:Titus will you consider endorsing a flavor lynch

I don't like how overly confident you are in your Flavor read

AaronFrost · Post Post #1706 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:11 pm

In post 1705, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 1600, OkaPoka wrote:Titus will you consider endorsing a flavor lynch
I don't like how overly confident you are in your Flavor read

Like if you really want him lynched then you need to make a really convincing case on why his WIFOM logic comes from scum.

I'm not saying that FL is definitively town, and I've already said that I don't know how to read him, but I'm not convinced it comes from scum either.

Bitmap · Post Post #1707 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:14 pm

In post 1702, Sherlock and Watson wrote:
In post 1698, Bitmap wrote:I like Watson better.
u wanna fite?

-S

ok

In post 1703, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 1559, Bitmap wrote:Am I the only one that likes Boon's recent posts?
Why do you like them?

They felt genuine and seemed like even though his approach (setup spec) was bad, his intentions didn't seem bad.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1708 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:18 pm

In post 1707, Bitmap wrote:
In post 1702, Sherlock and Watson wrote:
In post 1698, Bitmap wrote:I like Watson better.
u wanna fite?

-S
ok

In post 1703, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 1559, Bitmap wrote:Am I the only one that likes Boon's recent posts?
Why do you like them?

They felt genuine and seemed like even though his approach (setup spec) was bad, his intentions didn't seem bad.

What useful intent did you find in those posts? Because I can certainly see plenty of scum intent in all the noise, but not a whole lot of reason to townread the slot for those specific posts.

-Cerb

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1709 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:20 pm

AF - not ascetic
FA - has not claimed
gobbles - has not claimed
Fl - has not claimed
TSE - has not claimed

Did we ever get answers from these individuals? Because right now I just see 2 ascetic claims, which seems...low for a game with an ascetic enabler.

-Cerb

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #1710 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:23 pm

Bitmap if so why did you ask if anyone feels the same when that's almost verbatim what I said

-S

Alisae · Post Post #1711 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:23 pm

In post 1709, Reasonably Rational wrote:FA - has not claimed

She said not ascetic??????????

Alisae · Post Post #1712 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:23 pm

imagine not reading the thread

AaronFrost · Post Post #1713 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:25 pm

In post 1707, Bitmap wrote:
In post 1703, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 1559, Bitmap wrote:Am I the only one that likes Boon's recent posts?
Why do you like them?
They felt genuine and seemed like even though his approach (setup spec) was bad, his intentions didn't seem bad.

I think it is something that scum!Boon is capable of doing if he wanted to create noise/confusion (I don't even follow the logic much tbh) but I'm not sure scum!Boon chooses to do that in this gamestate 50 pages into the game.

What do you make of Oka's hard on for lynching FL, because that's not giving me good vibes right now.

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #1714 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:25 pm

Cerb do you imagine fingers snapping like you're at a slam poetry recital every time you make a post

-s

AaronFrost · Post Post #1715 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:25 pm

In post 1711, Alisae wrote:
In post 1709, Reasonably Rational wrote:FA - has not claimed
She said not ascetic??????????

Didn't TSE also claim not ascetic?

OkaPoka · Post Post #1716 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:27 pm

Just vote me already aaron i know you are heading that way

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1717 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:28 pm

In post 1714, Sherlock and Watson wrote:Cerb do you imagine fingers snapping like you're at a slam poetry recital every time you make a post

-s

I...I don't? Shit. Should I be doing that? Is that what YOU imagine???

Can someone who isn't the fucking guilty child answer my query, in a fashion that is constructive.

Aaron: Your lack of certainty concerns me. Bah. Fine. I'll go like, ISO them or something.

-Cerb

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #1718 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:29 pm

In post 649, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm not ascetic either

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #1719 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:31 pm

Tbf if boon claimed ascetic I would immediately lynch him so we should probably operate under the assumption he did not and would not claim ascetic at this point even if he was

-s

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #1720 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:33 pm

In post 483, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:
In post 481, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 439, Titus wrote:
In post 438, AaronFrost wrote:Anything important happen in these last 18 pages, because that'll effect how closely I read it.
We have 3+ ascetics. So, at least skim.

Claim whether you're ascetic as well please.
K so going back to this, I trust Pine's claim which, if true, likely means one of the other two ascetic claims is scum.
What’s Ascetic?

This is probably a 'not ascetix' claim

-s

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1721 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:33 pm

Hmm so TSE implied not ascetic by asking what ascetic was, gobbles asked to be the last to respond. FA definitely claimed not ascetic. FL definitely did not even say the word ascetic in any of their posts.

S+W: Did we get a definitive response from you? There was that whole commuter then oh right I'm actually ascetic thing, but I do not believe you have definitely stated whether you are or are not ascetic.
FL: Confirm asceticism or the absence thereof for your slot please.
TSE: Please explicitly state that you are or are not ascetic, thanks.

If you did and I missed it, please humor me and let me know you did so, and/or answer the question again.

-Cerb

Sherlock and Watson · Post Post #1722 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:35 pm

Not ascetic bae, unless u want me to be <3

-s

AaronFrost · Post Post #1723 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:35 pm

In post 1716, OkaPoka wrote:Just vote me already aaron i know you are heading that way

If you insist ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

but yeah that is the direction i'm headed atm

VOTE: Oka

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1724 (ISO) » Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:36 pm

Gobble: It's about time for you to say yea or nay with regards to your asceticism as well! If FL refusing to share means you will also refuse to share, then just assume he's refused; if not, then just answer the question since whether he responds or not does not matter to you.

Fuck I'm turning into those people I hate who just spam the thread with a bunch of little fucking posts instead of putting it all together into a single thought. ><
-Cerb

pedit: TY SW