Titus v. Alisae (endgame)

[Sherlock and Watson]

????????
all of them?

So you see nothing AI in any of his posts. It's not that some posts seem scummy and some seem towny, you just get nothing?

-S

[Espeonage]

I wasn't aware scum reading people for posting without contributing for half a day phase was insulting.

Since when is "positive for the game" a comment on alignment?

-S

It isn't

Okay then why are you acting like you didn't just insult me?

-S

Because I didn't?

PEDIT: P much. But that's how I read the game. I tend to be a bigger picture player. If I see something particularly indicative I'll single it out, but that is less common.

[Espeonage]

I read a lot on tone and mentality v words.

That's not an individual post thing.

[Ankamius]

Also Ank, word to the wise, if you want to talk down about seriousness, maybe don't open with a readslist based on random.org?

JUST SAYIN' :P You might have a bit more cred here if you weren't playing to deliberately obstruct cohesive reads of your alignment :3

-S

it's posts like this that make me want to flashlynch the fuck out of you

this is exactly how you treat me as scum.

[Sherlock and Watson]

Because I didn't?

So who you were insulting then? Cerb?

P sure I explained that I have issues with the fact that Maria might be trying to pocket people but overall I think they are fine and positive for the game. Unlike another hydra in this thread.

You just said "positive for the game" isn't a comment on alignment, so this is obviously an insult. So why did you suddenly start getting personal?

-S

[Sherlock and Watson]

it's posts like this that make me want to flashlynch the fuck out of you

this is exactly how you treat me as scum.

Critical difference here, I didn't insult your ability to read me, I was more commenting on your general level of credibility in the thread rn

-S

[Ankamius]

what makes you think I was referring to you insulting my ability to read you?

[Espeonage]

Well considering I was scum reading you for being unhelpful to the thread for a long period of time, fairly sure it means I think you're scum.

[Sherlock and Watson]

Well considering I was scum reading you for being unhelpful to the thread for a long period of time, fairly sure it means I think you're scum.

I wasn't aware scum reading people for posting without contributing for half a day phase was insulting.

Since when is "positive for the game" a comment on alignment?

-S

It isn't

Then why did you say this? Get confused by negatives?

-S

[Sherlock and Watson]

what makes you think I was referring to you insulting my ability to read you?

Was that not a reference to TM? I can't think of any other game I've rolled scum vs. you?

-S

[Espeonage]

Well considering I was scum reading you for being unhelpful to the thread for a long period of time, fairly sure it means I think you're scum.

I wasn't aware scum reading people for posting without contributing for half a day phase was insulting.

Since when is "positive for the game" a comment on alignment?

-S

It isn't

Then why did you say this? Get confused by negatives?

-S

Being helpful isn't alignment indicative.
Being unhelpful however is indicative.

[Ankamius]

gay dance???

[Sherlock and Watson]

Hmm, do you think that making a weirdly convoluted response like 2146 is helpful or unhelpful for the thread? Because it seems like gradeschool level equivocation and wasted like 5 minutes of my time so yeah, thanks for your "helpfulness"

-S

[Sherlock and Watson]

gay dance???

I said anything in that game before replacing out? I'll see if I can find it I don't really remember it tbh

-S

[Alisae]

Hah
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

[Alisae]

[Espeonage]

Well I've just reiterated that positive for the game isn't alignment indicative. I'm not the one that assumed because one action is scummy the opposite action is townie.

[Sherlock and Watson]

I negged you for not dancing with me then left, I think my tone is like wildly different here but I'm probably not an objective observer, but I don't see any critiques of your reads or abilities? I mostly just did nothing and and qq'd about pairings

-S

[Sherlock and Watson]

Well I've just reiterated that positive for the game isn't alignment indicative. I'm not the one that assumed because one action is scummy the opposite action is townie.

Yeah, and not clarifying an obvious point of confusion when asked about it directly is certainly not an unhelpful/rude thing to do. You're really winning hearts and minds here Esp, go get'em

-S

[Ankamius]

and yes, I did RNG my public reads specifically to bait a general sense of "oh this isn't quite right" and to see what kind of reactions I'd get

I didn't expect a 5-person wagon to sprout up almost instantly with the fucking town stump egging it on and basically destroying any chance of me skating by without playing more of my cards than I ever wanted to on day one

if I'm going to get lynched for that, then whatever, it happens and fuck me for trying to increase my odds of being able to play more than a single day of one of these games I guess

[Ankamius]

that sounds angry

I'm not actually angry

[Sherlock and Watson]

Ank you're not getting lynched today, calm down bejeebus

If you wanna fight me on Dunn you're going to need a helluva better towncase though

-S

pedit: yes it did but I'm posting this anyway even though maybe it's pointless

[Espeonage]

I did not realise that was what was giving you confusion until 2158. Like I don't understand in what world the opposite of a scum move is a town move. There's null in the middle. You even asked me about how much I was seeing as null.

This is an insult: Learn your mafia fundamentals.

[Ankamius]

my towncase for dunn is how are you even scumreading him???

[Sherlock and Watson]

This is an insult: Learn your mafia fundamentals.

Thank you! At least I feel like we're on the same page now :3

-S