In post 884, SausasaurusRex wrote:In your iso at this point you have too little justification. Whilst you may have stated that you scumread him, you have little evidence he is scummy, and so to attempt to start a wagon without absolute certainty Invisibility is scum isn’t good.In post 805, nomnomnom wrote:Ank how do you feel about wagoning invis with me
In post 866, SausasaurusRex wrote:I disagree. It is always better to overjustify than underjustify, no matter which alignment you play. By “over justifying” you ensure that your logic is fully understood by everyone, which allows you to convince people to vote with you. It is beneficial for scum because it causes mislynch, and beneficial for town because the person you think is scum gets lynched.In post 863, nomnomnom wrote:I have the impression Gjt is justifying something that could be summed up in a few words but instead tries to overjustify himself which is usually a scum trademark, but like... ergh
Therefore, overjustification cannot indicate alignment.
In my honest opinion, this is too little of a progression to signify that it's a scum progression. My impression of Rex is that he's a logical player and if he had TMI that Nom was his partner with, he most definitely wouldn't have placed a naked vote after having only 2 lines with nom that he knows he'll get scrutinised for.
Moreover, I think he would've felt the urging need to point something highly scum indicative before moving onto her. His logical personality doesn't line up with my mental map of how a logical-centred person would choose to bus here. He either completely ignores the slot, or buries it in evidence before placing a final vote.
If he was pre-planning a bus, then those posts absolutely suck from a scum!him perspective that wants to bus a team mate. Again, he was too calm and spoke to her as if she was town there / a person that he has no read on, it's virtually impossible for him not to feel some sort of pressure there to create some form of anti-spew or make a post that really incriminates her before placing a vote.
If he wanted to bus his scum bud, he would've buried her. I don't think Rex would've allowed himself to risk placing a naked vote on someone he has no engagement with for the whole time and then, knowing that he'll have to explain his switch, kill the person that could've defended him, going through the night.
It just makes no sense. You don't decide to bus a scum partner so openly without having anything to gain in return, and only to lose.
I'm probably never lynching Rex and neither should you, but you do you. This is not a wolf bussing a wolf or a wolf that knows his wolf partner is going to die so he falls under pressure somehow.