Okay, thanks for clarifying. I kind of thought the same thing as you on the surface-level busywork which is why I explicitly asked YK for reads.In post 474, Farkran wrote:In post 472, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Adorable
Generally weak reads and their town reads have no real effort behind it and seems like they just ripped them from Farkran. Their interactions with Brian was bad as well.I support this line of thought, but i want to clarify that my scumlean of YK has little to do with their vote, which is just part of an overall tendency to look like they're doing things whereas they aren't. It's very early, but all i see them doing is asking questions but not drawing conclusions from answers. There's no depth in their posts, just surface-level busywork. I could say the same about adorable.In post 473, Bitmap wrote:YK isn't a bad wagon but it seems the premise for that wagon was their vote on Eragon as the second vote and being scummy while I basically got a free pass for being the third vote seemed pretty bad reasoning overall.
@YK:Who are you townreading and scumreading atm?
I think i have reconsidered my previous read of shadowless, still not hood-worthy though, in my opinion.
@Bitmap do you think Amrun is up to something bad?
I'm not really sure on Amrun yet but like out of all the votes on Eragon, even I would say mine would have been the most suspicious which makes the whole Amrun-YK interaction kind of weird.