@espeonage this was a serious question, i'm interestedIn post 321, Farkran wrote: How long since you last played scum?
Mini Theme 2120 | Waifu Upick | Good Waifus Win!
Forum rules
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Torque
-
Torque Mafia Scum
- Torque
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: April 4, 2017
- Location: Eagle Jump
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
@mods can you include the amount of votes required for a majority and the countdown to deadline in the VCs?
Or update them in post #0 if it's easier for you? I know i'm being lazy but it would be useful
OP now has a new section. ~ τLast edited by Torque on Thu Feb 20, 2020 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Wondertime
-
Wondertime Goon
- Wondertime
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: January 9, 2020
- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- Wondertime
-
Wondertime Goon
- Wondertime
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: January 9, 2020
I advise that Brian and Espeonage move to another wagon! While Adorable certainly is focused on one target I can't help but tell they're two good waifus going after each other. Poor things. With our powers combined, we can defeat the evil that lurks within our group!
pedit: I agree! I must admit I do not townread Amrun quite as hard as the others, but they're still towny regardless!
~Time- Yumeko and Kirari
-
Yumeko and Kirari Townie
- Yumeko and Kirari
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: February 5, 2020
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
I have a scum game that finished yesterday.In post 500, Farkran wrote:
@espeonage this was a serious question, i'm interestedIn post 321, Farkran wrote: How long since you last played scum?Don't @ me.- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
Yeah ofcIn post 441, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Correct me if i'm wrong Espeonage, but i interpreted this vote of yours as a joke referring to events in the last game we played. Is that a correct assumption to make?
Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
rightIn post 451, Brian Skies wrote:
Adorable did actually OMGUS vote me.In post 408, Espeonage wrote:They theory. Why didn't Adorable OMGUS Brian if they thought it was a naked serious vote with no real reasoning.
Does it mean Adorable is scared?
Like the closest thing to analysis is a soft omegas without a vote.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Bitmap
-
Bitmap Jack of All Trades
- Bitmap
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8962
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: Somewhere
Ok lets take a step back. Post 75 is Eragon saying "Interesting" which is why I don't get your argument right now. Can you please clarify the correct post or quote it for me?In post 479, Amrun wrote:In post 475, Bitmap wrote:
Okay, thanks for clarifying. I kind of thought the same thing as you on the surface-level busywork which is why I explicitly asked YK for reads.In post 474, Farkran wrote:In post 472, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Adorable
Generally weak reads and their town reads have no real effort behind it and seems like they just ripped them from Farkran. Their interactions with Brian was bad as well.
I support this line of thought, but i want to clarify that my scumlean of YK has little to do with their vote, which is just part of an overall tendency to look like they're doing things whereas they aren't. It's very early, but all i see them doing is asking questions but not drawing conclusions from answers. There's no depth in their posts, just surface-level busywork. I could say the same about adorable.In post 473, Bitmap wrote:YK isn't a bad wagon but it seems the premise for that wagon was their vote on Eragon as the second vote and being scummy while I basically got a free pass for being the third vote seemed pretty bad reasoning overall.
@YK:Who are you townreading and scumreading atm?
I think i have reconsidered my previous read of shadowless, still not hood-worthy though, in my opinion.
@Bitmap do you think Amrun is up to something bad?
I'm not really sure on Amrun yet but like out of all the votes on Eragon, even I would say mine would have been the most suspicious which makes the whole Amrun-YK interaction kind of weird.
Once again, I really didn’t mind either one of your votes.
However, I found it super weird that they “wanted” to vote for Eragon at post 75 and didn’t for ???? reasons. That’s why I’m voting there."I give up on trying to read you. You're unimaginably scummy, with a dose of ultra-Town thrown in for spice."- Bitmap
-
Bitmap Jack of All Trades
- Bitmap
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8962
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: Somewhere
Hmm. Ok I see where you're getting from but I think having post to post back to back is the same thing as a single post.In post 495, Adorable wrote:
On #358 I only said Xtoxm and Norway and when I read through your posts I added you on #359. Your thought on me sheeping Farkran's reads looks strange because it would have been Xtoxm, Norway, and Bitmap in one post all together instead of being in 2 separate posts.In post 493, Bitmap wrote:
I think the main concern was that it seemed like you were sheeping Farkran's reads mindlessly and not really formulating your own reads.In post 491, Adorable wrote:
No one asked me to elaborate on my reads at the time and there is nothing scummy about giving weak reads on day 1 in less than 24 hours.In post 472, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Adorable
Generally weak reads and their town reads have no real effort behind it and seems like they just ripped them from Farkran. Their interactions with Brian was bad as well.
In another game I was getting scum read for not giving town reads and now I'm getting scum read for giving town reads. I don't understand what the players want now? Should I give town reads or should I not?
However, I like your other posts so far so...
UNVOTE:"I give up on trying to read you. You're unimaginably scummy, with a dose of ultra-Town thrown in for spice."- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Yeah that’s the right post. They’re saying they found that one word post scummy and wanted to vote for them then, but instead, elected to continue to vote for NO ONE until someone else voted Eragon first, while Eragon was absent.In post 513, Bitmap wrote:
Ok lets take a step back. Post 75 is Eragon saying "Interesting" which is why I don't get your argument right now. Can you please clarify the correct post or quote it for me?In post 479, Amrun wrote:In post 475, Bitmap wrote:
Okay, thanks for clarifying. I kind of thought the same thing as you on the surface-level busywork which is why I explicitly asked YK for reads.In post 474, Farkran wrote:In post 472, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Adorable
Generally weak reads and their town reads have no real effort behind it and seems like they just ripped them from Farkran. Their interactions with Brian was bad as well.
I support this line of thought, but i want to clarify that my scumlean of YK has little to do with their vote, which is just part of an overall tendency to look like they're doing things whereas they aren't. It's very early, but all i see them doing is asking questions but not drawing conclusions from answers. There's no depth in their posts, just surface-level busywork. I could say the same about adorable.In post 473, Bitmap wrote:YK isn't a bad wagon but it seems the premise for that wagon was their vote on Eragon as the second vote and being scummy while I basically got a free pass for being the third vote seemed pretty bad reasoning overall.
@YK:Who are you townreading and scumreading atm?
I think i have reconsidered my previous read of shadowless, still not hood-worthy though, in my opinion.
@Bitmap do you think Amrun is up to something bad?
I'm not really sure on Amrun yet but like out of all the votes on Eragon, even I would say mine would have been the most suspicious which makes the whole Amrun-YK interaction kind of weird.
Once again, I really didn’t mind either one of your votes.
However, I found it super weird that they “wanted” to vote for Eragon at post 75 and didn’t for ???? reasons. That’s why I’m voting there.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
This is gonna look terrible for me if YandK flips scum. But I really don't see their vote as an issue.
Like, I spent a good half hour debating who to vote after Eragon bc Adorable felt too convenient while Norway is annoyed at me already and I didn't want to fan the flames, and I have an agenda to be town read with the election.
It may bc I lie more as town than as scum and care more about being town read as town than as scum, but I legit feel like the one liner added to the 'case' and was a fine vote, especially for the game state.Don't @ me.- Bitmap
-
Bitmap Jack of All Trades
- Bitmap
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8962
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: Somewhere
@Amrun This post right?In post 371, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:
I almost voted Eragon around post 75, but didn't - Espeonage voting is what prompted me to vote, though.In post 370, Amrun wrote:
Did you only vote because Espeonage did?In post 368, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:
Who do you think we should vote?In post 367, Amrun wrote:That was an oddly quick succession of votes.
I have no opinion on this wagon.
-Y
-Y"I give up on trying to read you. You're unimaginably scummy, with a dose of ultra-Town thrown in for spice."- Bitmap
-
Bitmap Jack of All Trades
- Bitmap
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8962
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: Somewhere
I'm still baffled that I'm not the wagon because I think quantitatively speaking if you're going to push Y&K then you should be pushing me instead.
But I'm just used to getting wagoned in general regardless of alignment."I give up on trying to read you. You're unimaginably scummy, with a dose of ultra-Town thrown in for spice."- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Yumeko and Kirari
-
Yumeko and Kirari Townie
- Yumeko and Kirari
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: February 5, 2020
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
Town-ishIn post 522, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:Esp what's your read on Eragon now?
Also the drugs are really helping and I don't feel drowsy, I'm hoping this is gonna be more weeks to heal rather than months
-KDon't @ me.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Espeonage
- Yumeko and Kirari
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Bitmap
- Bitmap
- Espeonage
- Amrun
- Bitmap
- Bitmap
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- NorwegianboyEE
- Espeonage
- Yumeko and Kirari
- Wondertime
- NorwegianboyEE
- Wondertime
- Farkran
- Torque
- Farkran