Micro 922: Strawberry Mafia (Game over!)

[Luca Blight]

Show me where they SR you?

[Slaxx]

I'm not going to manufacture a damn read on you. If it's that scum-indicative, shouldn't you be voting me?

I am voting you?

Do you still have no read on me?

I have a read on you that's contingent upon something, but I'm waiting on a specific person to post before I do, because I want their reaction to this first.

[Slaxx]

So no, I don't.

[Luca Blight]

Did agree with this though.

Slaxx

Posts 59 - 61 all seem like reads for the sake of reads. I don't relate to any of them at all and it seems contrived.

78 is a bit weird - I thought Ame was joking about the answer key? Although I can't tell if Slaxx is being serious here himself, but he certainly seems to be taking what Ame said at face value.

And the reason I included Kanna is because she agreed with my reasoning here.

I can see Compath had you just below the null line, but I got more of an impression of a SR from Kanna than either Hectic/Compath.

Regardless, my main beef is with your null read on me, given I was the only one who specified reasoning against you. I would have expected some curiosity or acknowledgement on your part as Town. If I was truly null to you, I'd have expected you to ISO me, or engage with me as a matter of priority.

[Slaxx]

I have ISO'd you. You did something that strikes me as town, but it only works in a certain scenario. I am trying to let that scenario play out. I'm not giving you any more in the meantime.

[Slaxx]

Its not a test if a person has the answers.

[Luca Blight]

Why is no one questioning my commitment to voting compath

Hey Ddl.

Slight town points for what seems like genuine frustration people aren’t engaging with him.

Icon slight town for being the first to mKe an actual substantial push

Don’t like #8 and #9 from compath, looks like someone who is trying to look like they want to generate content without actually putting forth effort to generate any.

I mean, you're basing reads on stuff like this, and yet, until your readslist, you had no comment to make about me whatsoever?

That's BS.

[Luca Blight]

Until I called you out, even. After your readslist you continued to have zero opinion on me whatsoever.

You're allowed to have null reads, but when you've shown a willingness to base reads on trivial things in some instances, then it doesn't make sense to ignore someone who has a lot more content and who happens to be attacking you in another instance.

[Slaxx]

That was page 3.

At that point, your ISO had an RVS vote and RQS answers.

I'm done with this. When the thing happens that needs to happen, I'll explain it. In the meantime, I'm letting it go.

[Luca Blight]

But your readslist was page 10.

As I said, it makes no sense. Feel free to drop this, but my SR on you will remain until you do something to change my mind.

[Luca Blight]

To specify a bit, the logic doesn't feel revisionist.

I'm not for sure if I agree with it, but I believe they believe it.

I don't know if scum-DDl pushes on me out of the gate though. The most memorable game I had with him was on my lolwagons alt where I stomped scum out early, and I know was scum I wouldn't immediately push on someone the way he did. Not saying he wouldn't push on me at all,

just not for sure he goes this ham with it out the gate as scum

. So I think I feel alright about DDL now as well.

Did DDL really '

go ham'

with his SR on you?

Spoiler:

slaxx i think your entrance is scummy

VOTE: slaxxx
feelin decent about compath rn actually

VOTE: luca blight
this is the way to go

VOTE: slaxx

[Luca Blight]

@Slaxx

What is your actual read about me, considering that I didn't put you on my list ?

VOTE: Clidd

For one, whoever said that his reads post felt wordy to obfuscate motivations, I agree.

I also don't like holding off on a read of me until I give my read on him. I feel like town would just give the read here, because I obviously had enough content to make a read on

(I think literally every on of yall scum read me by this post), or at least list as null. To me this is scum waiting for my read on them to determine how they play their next move. I'm also not for sure why my read is contingent upon him excluding me from the list, unless I cam connecting two things that aren't connected.

But what I don't like most about the ISO is 3 scum reads this early, with another person "going either way" (isnt that just null?) this along with holding off a read on me seems like someone who is really playing to keep their options open and not sort.

Bold

- Wow, you were SR'ing Clidd for similar reasons to why I'm SR'ing you, and yet you can't seem to understand where I'm coming from?

Underlined

- Strange, because I had

four

SR's and you didn't comment on that at all?

[Iconeum]

trainee "trainee" trainee again!

Knight Luca's suspicious on Conniver Kanna actually have good grounds with what he can see, and is a good look for him! but Luca, the coffee questions and "Wow" are almost definitely NAI in this context

Wyvern Icon! what do you think of Demon Slayer Ame's 196? i'm surprised you had nothing to say it about it considering your earlier push and suspicion on Ame regarding her Compath read (◕ﬦ ◕✿)

I'm coming around on that scumread on Ame. What pinged me earlier still pings me, but I don't see *why* mafia would play this out like this? I'm still curious to the results of said RQS and the link to previous games where ame finally proves the statement tho.

Also can't really describe it but Icon is giving me decent town feelz. I think my list is probably

(Ame, Compath, DDL, Icon)-Slight Town
(Luca, Kanna)-Null
(Hectic)- Slight Scum
(Clidd)- Scum

You remind me a lot of a player called Espeonage from a past game (he was

scum

).

This is yuck. Shading, no content.

Clidd feels like he's trying too hard to be honest.

@Clidd - How is your Iconeum read different from the null reads you have on Luca and DDL?

Why did you basically completely ignore slaxx?

Why do you need something to "radically" change your opinion in order to not scumread Ame, despite stating that you only find them to be slightly suspicious?

Why is playing a character town-indicative for Hectic? In my opinion, it'd be scum-indicative because he gets to hide behind the character that he's playing.

What specifically did you find scummy in Kanna/my RQS answers? Did you find the fact that we quickly complied with RQS to be scummy, or something else?

1. It depends on whether I can differentiate the questioning between

Iconeum

and

Ame

, considering that it could be the beginning of a possible death tunnel, or just a different line of thought. I have seen this kind of attitude before, so I wanted to confirm that the intention, too, would be the same. Based on that, it is like a ''

Joker

'', as it can take both sides depending on the interpretation of a specific attitude, post or action.

2. There is no specific reason, considering that I forgot about him during the reasoning. I have been overloading myself recently, so it's not uncommon for this to happen. As I saw that it had happened, I thought about directing a question to him, so that I didn't have to rewrite my post and read his ISO.

3. Because it is a progressive sensation, that starts small and intensifies as the interactions happen. Already predicting this, I used the term to justify if, later, I changed my mind, through some significant post or event.

4. Well, that would mean talking about games in progress, which is forbidden, but basically it's not something normal coming from

scum!Hectic

that I expect. And, also, it seems like an activity that he is enjoying doing and demands editing time, so I believe that, in this context, it would not be used in bad faith. But, of course, it would make sense if he sought to switch to narration in order to disrupt the behavioral read of his posts, in that case, it would be up to you to judge it as bad or not.

5. In a simple way, it would be the parallel that I drew with one of my two games as scum. It was not conclusive, but intigative to promote an interaction between us, like the one that is happening right now.

The same trend in most of Clidds posts: many words, not a lot of content and most certainly not any conclusions.

Also can't really describe it but Icon is giving me decent town feelz. I think my list is probably

(Ame, Compath, DDL, Icon)-Slight Town
(Luca, Kanna)-Null
(Hectic)- Slight Scum
(Clidd)- Scum

It's interesting how Slaxx ignores mine and Kanna's suspicion of him and just plants us both as 'null'.

I think it's very unlikely Clidd is scum this game btw based on meta.

Independently from meta, I don't townread Clidd.

I played against scum!Clidd twice and he replaced out both times right at the start

Yikes...

Well. As long as we don't enter trust tell territory, this is pretty convincing lol.

[Luca Blight]

Do you have a read on Slaxx, Icon?

[Iconeum]

I think he's town actually. And I think Clidd is scum. I know your meta defence of him, but the dude is literally not providing any reads unless I missed them. He's spewing large posts that actually have little to no content in them, and they sure don't make a point.

Literally trying to look active without having to commit to anything.

[Iconeum]

Slaxx is sorting, making reads. I don't scumread him at all, but it's not like I have him as hard town either.

If you give me a gun and make me choose between slaxx and clidd, i shoot clidd.

[Luca Blight]

It seems a little odd how I ask you a question about Slaxx and you turn the attention onto Clidd lol

Why aren’t you voting Clidd?

[Iconeum]

It seems a little odd how I ask you a question about Slaxx and you turn the attention onto Clidd lol

Why aren’t you voting Clidd?

I'm not sure that's entirely true, I gave you my opinion on Slaxx. I am also saying I don't agree with Clidd being town. Not sure why you don't want me to talk about that?

[Iconeum]

Why aren’t you voting Clidd?

I'm unsure about what I wanna do right now.

We will have to have a talk about ame later in this day, depending on what it provides on the RQS.

[Luca Blight]

I’m fine talking about anything, it just seemed an abrupt change in direction.

Did you look at Clidd’s meta? What do you think?

[Iconeum]

I’m fine talking about anything, it just seemed an abrupt change in direction.

Did you look at Clidd’s meta? What do you think?

You see abrubt change, I see relevant opinion on a slot that's being talked about.

I didn't validate his meta if that's what you mean. Using something like 'player x always reps out if he's scum' is bad for a myriad of reasons:

-trust tell (explicitely against the rules)
-it ignores actual play
-it goes against what I consider to be the spirit of the game

[Iconeum]

all of you (luca), compath and kanna are giving me town vibes when i read you

[Iconeum]

i'm not sure about hectic and it's roleplay

i've literally never seen hectic do that so i don't know what it means

it's funny and great, but i can't really read him based off of that

[Luca Blight]

I’m fine talking about anything, it just seemed an abrupt change in direction.

Did you look at Clidd’s meta? What do you think?

You see abrubt change, I see relevant opinion on a slot that's being talked about.

I didn't validate his meta if that's what you mean. Using something like 'player x always reps out if he's scum' is bad for a myriad of reasons:

-trust tell (explicitely against the rules)
-it ignores actual play
-it goes against what I consider to be the spirit of the game

I'm not suggesting Clidd will always replace out as scum, but the fact he's done so twice means he probably hates playing as scum, and his play in this game doesn't reflect that.

And I meant have you checked his Town meta, like Slaxx did earlier?

[Iconeum]

i haven't