In post 574, Eragon wrote:and case in point
that game is 0.0% like the newbie game that you previously quoted.
Meta's CHANGE and EVOLVE over time.
so do PEOPLE, and HABITS
oh wait
I just realized I was mafia that game
lmfaooo
In post 574, Eragon wrote:and case in point
that game is 0.0% like the newbie game that you previously quoted.
Meta's CHANGE and EVOLVE over time.
so do PEOPLE, and HABITS
In post 576, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:I knew I had some other games with you just couldn't remember where they were
I remember your iso there feeling kinda blah but active which is kinda how I was feeling about you here
so yeah meta does shape my basic expectations for your play; marathon games play a part, that newbie from a year ago that I read pretty closely, and then the scum game where I didn't really remember that well because that game sucked butt but I was feeling like I felt you were kinda spicier as town and here you've been lacking spice
I also was considering moving to Shireen or thinking about reassessing so you blowing up this meta point just seems overly concerned with how my slot is perceiving you. But now that I think about it I do think this is closer to your scumgame than your towngame, although it seems like you don't care about meta which doesn't make it clear to me why you're flipping out over me having you as null-scum in a game with a fair number of townie slots
-K
I would say that I like the challenge and the glory of winning
Who did you identify as having a hard townread of Amrun?In post 505, Wondertime wrote:I advise that Brian and Espeonage move to another wagon! While Adorable certainly is focused on one target I can't help but tell they're two good waifus going after each other. Poor things. With our powers combined, we can defeat the evil that lurks within our group!
pedit: I agree! I must admit I do not townread Amrun quite as hard as the others, but they're still towny regardless!
~Time
Who is scum on your wagon? If you are going to do VCA based on your role PM, i am 100% in favor of it but i'd like to hear analysis instead of info.In post 506, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:Yeah I think there's at most one scum on us right now and it could be an all town wagon pretty easily
-K
Uhm... while this has nothing to do with any of the mentioned names being town or scum, i think Adorable's explanation is genuine here. Like, normally you wouldn't use that as a reason to explain your apparent sheeping.In post 514, Bitmap wrote:Hmm. Ok I see where you're getting from but I think having post to post back to back is the same thing as a single post.In post 495, Adorable wrote:On #358 I only said Xtoxm and Norway and when I read through your posts I added you on #359. Your thought on me sheeping Farkran's reads looks strange because it would have been Xtoxm, Norway, and Bitmap in one post all together instead of being in 2 separate posts.In post 493, Bitmap wrote:I think the main concern was that it seemed like you were sheeping Farkran's reads mindlessly and not really formulating your own reads.In post 491, Adorable wrote:No one asked me to elaborate on my reads at the time and there is nothing scummy about giving weak reads on day 1 in less than 24 hours.In post 472, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Adorable
Generally weak reads and their town reads have no real effort behind it and seems like they just ripped them from Farkran. Their interactions with Brian was bad as well.
In another game I was getting scum read for not giving town reads and now I'm getting scum read for giving town reads. I don't understand what the players want now? Should I give town reads or should I not?
However, I like your other posts so far so...
UNVOTE:
I definitely know where you come from. Why would you insist on your vote being scummier than Yumeko as a point of interest, though? What's the scum motivation for players to attack Yumeko instead of you, assuming you're both town?In post 518, Bitmap wrote:I'm still baffled that I'm not the wagon because I think quantitatively speaking if you're going to push Y&K then you should be pushing me instead.
But I'm just used to getting wagoned in general regardless of alignment.
NoIn post 537, Espeonage wrote:Hey Bitty. Going to take you up on your offer. How do you feel about us agreeing to us and Brian?
Why?In post 539, Bitmap wrote:I approve.In post 537, Espeonage wrote:Hey Bitty. Going to take you up on your offer. How do you feel about us agreeing to us and Brian?
Why would either town or scum invent that they'd vote their current target earlier when we are already very early in the game, and there's no reason to fake that as an excuse for voting...?In post 542, Amrun wrote:It’s more the manner in which one cares about appearances. That particular one just rubbed me the wrong way.In post 527, Espeonage wrote:Ok, but I did address that. I know I care much more about my appearance as town than as scum. Bc I know I can always cash in on free credit as scum by using theatre and aloofness and idgaf is usually towered by people.In post 525, Amrun wrote:In post 516, Espeonage wrote:This is gonna look terrible for me if YandK flips scum. But I really don't see their vote as an issue.
Like, I spent a good half hour debating who to vote after Eragon bc Adorable felt too convenient while Norway is annoyed at me already and I didn't want to fan the flames, and I have an agenda to be town read with the election.
It may bc I lie more as town than as scum and care more about being town read as town than as scum, but I legit feel like the one liner added to the 'case' and was a fine vote, especially for the game state.
It’s not about the vote. The one liner was fine (and accurate).
I don’t know how to say in many more creative ways that I don’t mind the vote.
That’s why I don’t scumread Bitmap for it. Starting a wagon just to start one is actually 100% fine for this gamestate. It’s not about the vote! It’s about me realizing that they’re appearance concerned.
I don't think caring about appearances is AI necessarily.
Like - did they even think they wanted to vote at post 75, or did they just invent that because they thought I was about to attack them for sheeping?
What would the town concern about voting vs not voting at page 75 even be?
Why would scum be concerned about this - why would Town?
IMO there are a lot more scum reasons to be having any of those thoughts.
Alright let me go over this for you:In post 542, Amrun wrote:It’s more the manner in which one cares about appearances. That particular one just rubbed me the wrong way.In post 527, Espeonage wrote:Ok, but I did address that. I know I care much more about my appearance as town than as scum. Bc I know I can always cash in on free credit as scum by using theatre and aloofness and idgaf is usually towered by people.In post 525, Amrun wrote:In post 516, Espeonage wrote:This is gonna look terrible for me if YandK flips scum. But I really don't see their vote as an issue.
Like, I spent a good half hour debating who to vote after Eragon bc Adorable felt too convenient while Norway is annoyed at me already and I didn't want to fan the flames, and I have an agenda to be town read with the election.
It may bc I lie more as town than as scum and care more about being town read as town than as scum, but I legit feel like the one liner added to the 'case' and was a fine vote, especially for the game state.
It’s not about the vote. The one liner was fine (and accurate).
I don’t know how to say in many more creative ways that I don’t mind the vote.
That’s why I don’t scumread Bitmap for it. Starting a wagon just to start one is actually 100% fine for this gamestate. It’s not about the vote! It’s about me realizing that they’re appearance concerned.
I don't think caring about appearances is AI necessarily.
Like - did they even think they wanted to vote at post 75, or did they just invent that because they thought I was about to attack them for sheeping?
What would the town concern about voting vs not voting at page 75 even be?
Why would scum be concerned about this - why would Town?
IMO there are a lot more scum reasons to be having any of those thoughts.
This is a good post from Adorable.In post 550, Adorable wrote:Xtoxm - He said the role he got basically needs to be claimed saying if anyone needs their tier upgrading are to visit him and he also said even then, some abilities won't increase tier visitor for example, he's told wouldn't work. The claim looks really ballsy and I doubt scum would make a claim like this on day 1.In post 499, Farkran wrote:Adorable, you have only elaborated your scumread of brian skies. What about your other reads? I see we agree about some of our reads, perhaps including brian himself, but i'd like to hear your perspective on the other names you mentioned.
Norway - I liked his early scum hunting and this was when most of the pages were fluff at the time. He said he had early scum pings on Espeonage and Amrun. A few posts later he said maybe Espeonage is town and that looked like town who was trying to figure out Espeonage's alignment.
Bitmap - When I read through his iso his play looked town. I liked how he was interacting with players and #252 the reads looked genuine.
I literally explained it in that post.In post 594, Farkran wrote:Why would either town or scum invent that they'd vote their current target earlier when we are already very early in the game, and there's no reason to fake that as an excuse for voting...?In post 542, Amrun wrote:It’s more the manner in which one cares about appearances. That particular one just rubbed me the wrong way.In post 527, Espeonage wrote:Ok, but I did address that. I know I care much more about my appearance as town than as scum. Bc I know I can always cash in on free credit as scum by using theatre and aloofness and idgaf is usually towered by people.In post 525, Amrun wrote:In post 516, Espeonage wrote:This is gonna look terrible for me if YandK flips scum. But I really don't see their vote as an issue.
Like, I spent a good half hour debating who to vote after Eragon bc Adorable felt too convenient while Norway is annoyed at me already and I didn't want to fan the flames, and I have an agenda to be town read with the election.
It may bc I lie more as town than as scum and care more about being town read as town than as scum, but I legit feel like the one liner added to the 'case' and was a fine vote, especially for the game state.
It’s not about the vote. The one liner was fine (and accurate).
I don’t know how to say in many more creative ways that I don’t mind the vote.
That’s why I don’t scumread Bitmap for it. Starting a wagon just to start one is actually 100% fine for this gamestate. It’s not about the vote! It’s about me realizing that they’re appearance concerned.
I don't think caring about appearances is AI necessarily.
Like - did they even think they wanted to vote at post 75, or did they just invent that because they thought I was about to attack them for sheeping?
What would the town concern about voting vs not voting at page 75 even be?
Why would scum be concerned about this - why would Town?
IMO there are a lot more scum reasons to be having any of those thoughts.
I think you're scumreading Y&K for the wrong reasons, and this worries me a bit. Why is that specific thing striking you, about Y&K, instead of either A. assuming they are too easy a wagon to be scum or B. assuming they are scum because they haven't been producing useful content, which is the main reason people are voting there in the first place?
Note: unfortunately i was unable to catchup fully before i had to go, but i skimmed all content before posting the above multipost chain. I saved comments on xtoxm and eragon for later. I also need to check espeonage's meta because i'm having a bit of issues with him but i don't know if they are relevant - i think his scumrange is huge anyways.
See you later
I mean, it does make sense. Why would you announce that you don’t mean to lynch them, though? That’s weird.In post 595, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:Alright let me go over this for you:In post 542, Amrun wrote:It’s more the manner in which one cares about appearances. That particular one just rubbed me the wrong way.In post 527, Espeonage wrote:Ok, but I did address that. I know I care much more about my appearance as town than as scum. Bc I know I can always cash in on free credit as scum by using theatre and aloofness and idgaf is usually towered by people.In post 525, Amrun wrote:In post 516, Espeonage wrote:This is gonna look terrible for me if YandK flips scum. But I really don't see their vote as an issue.
Like, I spent a good half hour debating who to vote after Eragon bc Adorable felt too convenient while Norway is annoyed at me already and I didn't want to fan the flames, and I have an agenda to be town read with the election.
It may bc I lie more as town than as scum and care more about being town read as town than as scum, but I legit feel like the one liner added to the 'case' and was a fine vote, especially for the game state.
It’s not about the vote. The one liner was fine (and accurate).
I don’t know how to say in many more creative ways that I don’t mind the vote.
That’s why I don’t scumread Bitmap for it. Starting a wagon just to start one is actually 100% fine for this gamestate. It’s not about the vote! It’s about me realizing that they’re appearance concerned.
I don't think caring about appearances is AI necessarily.
Like - did they even think they wanted to vote at post 75, or did they just invent that because they thought I was about to attack them for sheeping?
What would the town concern about voting vs not voting at page 75 even be?
Why would scum be concerned about this - why would Town?
IMO there are a lot more scum reasons to be having any of those thoughts.
I thought about voting at 75 because once the conversation shifted to mechanics Eragon seemed to have less to offer (i.e. 'interesting' and nothing more). I'm not a compulsive voter, I don't vote anyone and everyone and then announce that I don't mean to lynch them, that's it's only for pressure - when I vote someone, it's to lynch them - this may or may not sync up with what Kirari does with our vote later. It doesn't matter to me what you would do there, because you are not me. Does that make sense to you?
-Y
Because I'm trying to trace back Amrun's thought process and thought that if I was in Amrun's shoes and assuming Amrun is town, I would probably think the blitz wagon especially on the later votes would be scummy.In post 592, Farkran wrote:I definitely know where you come from. Why would you insist on your vote being scummier than Yumeko as a point of interest, though? What's the scum motivation for players to attack Yumeko instead of you, assuming you're both town?In post 518, Bitmap wrote:I'm still baffled that I'm not the wagon because I think quantitatively speaking if you're going to push Y&K then you should be pushing me instead.
But I'm just used to getting wagoned in general regardless of alignment.
I can think of one reason for this, let's see if your thoughts match mine.
I don't think it's a bad hood.In post 593, Farkran wrote:NoIn post 537, Espeonage wrote:Hey Bitty. Going to take you up on your offer. How do you feel about us agreeing to us and Brian?
Why?In post 539, Bitmap wrote:I approve.In post 537, Espeonage wrote:Hey Bitty. Going to take you up on your offer. How do you feel about us agreeing to us and Brian?