Because of the fact Pine failed on Espy too.In post 6647, Hectic wrote:how is Espeonage not scummier for getting nothing 2 nights in a row?
eagerly awaiting what his God role yielded last night
It's under Jailkeeper as a Variant.
~WSome Jailkeepers not only protect their target from all kills, but also render its target untargetable by all other actions during that Night. This variant is also known as Alien.
Why not? If scum fear they can't kill him, then they roleblock him from here to eternity if they can. The puppy in Espy's game was definitely unkillable for scum. If they found that game night 1 they'd be aware of it.In post 6655, Hectic wrote:so the reason why i find it sus that Espeonage gets no results 2 nights in a row is that if he's actually a God role, he should only ever claim it day 1 if the God role can't be roleblocked/Aliened in some way, otherwise, why out yourself and effectively make yourself useless in the case of a roleblocker?
What are all the claims currently?In post 6658, Titus wrote:They should be out of blocks if I am correct. Despite TSE being wrong on Chemist, I still put stock in his all joats theory.
why would they fear they can't kill him?In post 6658, Titus wrote:Why not? If scum fear they can't kill him, then they roleblock him from here to eternity if they can. The puppy in Espy's game was definitely unkillable for scum. If they found that game night 1 they'd be aware of it.In post 6655, Hectic wrote:so the reason why i find it sus that Espeonage gets no results 2 nights in a row is that if he's actually a God role, he should only ever claim it day 1 if the God role can't be roleblocked/Aliened in some way, otherwise, why out yourself and effectively make yourself useless in the case of a roleblocker?
They should be out of blocks if I am correct. Despite TSE being wrong on Chemist, I still put stock in his all joats theory.
I didn’t. Perhaps you misunderstand what an enabler is
Titus, Espe claimed non-ascetic during our D1 claims, and then changed that to ascetic and PR later on.In post 6650, Titus wrote:Because of the fact Pine failed on Espy too.In post 6647, Hectic wrote:how is Espeonage not scummier for getting nothing 2 nights in a row?
eagerly awaiting what his God role yielded last night
No rationale for either. Simplest explanation is E was aliened.
There are possible reasons, but I'd like to see Espe's answer to this.In post 6660, Hectic wrote:why would they fear they can't kill him?In post 6658, Titus wrote:Why not? If scum fear they can't kill him, then they roleblock him from here to eternity if they can. The puppy in Espy's game was definitely unkillable for scum. If they found that game night 1 they'd be aware of it.In post 6655, Hectic wrote:so the reason why i find it sus that Espeonage gets no results 2 nights in a row is that if he's actually a God role, he should only ever claim it day 1 if the God role can't be roleblocked/Aliened in some way, otherwise, why out yourself and effectively make yourself useless in the case of a roleblocker?
They should be out of blocks if I am correct. Despite TSE being wrong on Chemist, I still put stock in his all joats theory.
was there reason to believe Espeonage was tough to nightkill?
the point i'm making though is why does town!Espeonage out himself as a powerful role worth roleblocking on day 1?
with no reasonable provocation as far as i can remember
Somewhere between 3775 and 5504. The first vote came on Bitmap at 4291 from AaronFrost.In post 6663, Ankamius wrote:I'm more hoping for a rough estimate on the page number.
In post 6667, Pine wrote:Successful action on Ank, by the way, with a positive result.
Why me?In post 6668, Pine wrote:Err, negative result. Sorry. She is not what my role detects for. That is a positive thing, hence the mix up.
Thank you, I'll look for this later.In post 6671, gobbledygook wrote:Somewhere between 3775 and 5504. The first vote came on Bitmap at 4291 from AaronFrost.In post 6663, Ankamius wrote:I'm more hoping for a rough estimate on the page number.
Pine, see bolded.In post 6666, Reasonably Rational wrote:Titus, Espe claimed non-ascetic during our D1 claims, and then changed that to ascetic and PR later on.In post 6650, Titus wrote:Because of the fact Pine failed on Espy too.In post 6647, Hectic wrote:how is Espeonage not scummier for getting nothing 2 nights in a row?
eagerly awaiting what his God role yielded last night
No rationale for either. Simplest explanation is E was aliened.
When did Pine fail on Espe?
-Cerb