Titus v. Alisae (endgame)

Ankamius · Post Post #6700 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:03 am

Interesting. I might know what it is then.

That's probably town if I'm right.

Ankamius · Post Post #6701 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:04 am

Pine, why are you scumreading me?

gobbledygook · Post Post #6702 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:06 am

Ank can we kill TSE yet

Ankamius · Post Post #6703 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:07 am

He's sadly town.

gobbledygook · Post Post #6704 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:09 am

Is that mod confirmed?

gobbledygook · Post Post #6705 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:09 am

If so your block of 5 becomes TSE, me, hectic, Oka, you

And we just win..?

Pine · Post Post #6706 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:10 am

In post 6701, Ankamius wrote:Pine, why are you scumreading me?

I'm not really anymore. My result is a (very) soft inno.

gobbledygook · Post Post #6707 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:11 am

Pine is probably town despite his terrible night 1 action

Ankamius · Post Post #6708 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:16 am

In post 6706, Pine wrote:
In post 6701, Ankamius wrote:Pine, why are you scumreading me?
I'm not really anymore. My result is a (very) soft inno.

Okay, why before then?

Hectic · Post Post #6709 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:16 am

why are you town again, Gobsie?

Hectic · Post Post #6710 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:18 am

i'm assuming Pine checks for ascetics or alien abilities?
why not just claim at this point, Pine?

Hectic · Post Post #6711 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:20 am

Ank, let's get one those fancy non-RNGed reads lists please

Pine · Post Post #6712 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:20 am

Because that guess is wrong.

Ankamius · Post Post #6713 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:21 am

Not yet. That's overplaying.

I'm waiting for at least one slot to show up before detailing my thoughts.

Hectic · Post Post #6714 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:23 am

fair enough to both

gobbledygook · Post Post #6715 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:30 am

In post 6709, Hectic wrote:why are you town again, Gobsie?

Because I caught Bitmap.

Why are you Town?

Titus · Post Post #6716 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:37 am

In post 6686, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 6684, Titus wrote:Ok, stepping out here. Vetoing Espy if he has a result. This is a scum driven push because they are out of blocks.

Doubly so because,
despite the agreement failure is a soft guilty
, no one followed on to SR.
Failure of what?
-Cerb

Chemist voyeur. We know he was town. He targeted SW.

Given Espy was almost certainly aliened, scum could not likely block both.

Titus · Post Post #6717 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:39 am

In post 6715, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 6709, Hectic wrote:why are you town again, Gobsie?
Because I caught Bitmap.

Why are you Town?

And Amrun visited him. Just saying what scum already know post flip.

Ankamius · Post Post #6718 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:43 am

Which one is voyeur again?

OkaPoka · Post Post #6719 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:50 am

We should mass claim tbh

Titus · Post Post #6720 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:50 am

In post 6718, Ankamius wrote:Which one is voyeur again?

Chemist joat. Watches what happens to a target. Doesn't get names but actions.

Titus · Post Post #6721 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:51 am

In post 6719, OkaPoka wrote:We should mass claim tbh

No. I'm not outing my mason(s) unless absolutely necessary.

Ankamius · Post Post #6722 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:51 am

Massclaim tomorrow.

OkaPoka · Post Post #6723 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:52 am

Masons can fakeclaim

Titus · Post Post #6724 (ISO) » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:56 am

In post 6723, OkaPoka wrote:Masons can fakeclaim

I'd rather just not massclaim. I have lied enough already.