In post 57, tictac wrote: In post 44, Something_Smart wrote: In post 40, tictac wrote:how a wagon moves, what the counterwagons are. who gets on and who doesn't.
none of this is different for a policy lynch than a regular lynch.
They still exist, true, but with a policy lynch, people's reasons for joining or not joining it are generally not related to their alignment.
I mean u going hard defense on TSE, and that's info that's gonna be useful tomorrow. More useful if we know what TSEs align is.
So yer 'no info from policy lynches' stance is kinda nonsensisical.
what do ya think of me pushing for a info lynch, yet calling info lynching crappy?
So why do you think smart is trying to defend tse. Do you think smart is trying to white knight tse or do you think they are buddies.
Also you day one you are pushing for info lynch but what info do you think you could find so soon into this day. After the wagons have shifted and moved like teh rolling sands then maybe then there would be info to a lynch. But even then dont you agree that its more secondary to lynching some you think has decent chance of being scum. Rather than just arbitrary picking a single player.
Your saying this before tse has even posted. Thus you have at the moment no indication of this alignment. So what i dont get why you are raising the prospect of a info lynch. I can understand you wanting at this point to wagon tse to get info from inorder to maybe judge who to lynch. But your already pushing the idea of tse lynch