In post 1323, Titus wrote:Except for the last sentence, it's how I feel about you?
In post 1323, Titus wrote:he's doing jack squat, outright refused to talk about the game at one point. All he's done is OMGUS scum read me after I called him scum and then tried to talk down my early scum reads.
how does ANY of this apply to me?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
like either this is x-men again or TSE really was scum. Like holy shit, these opinions are so bad. "Don't push profil, consolidate on the existing wagons." its the same shit scum Amrun is doing.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1147, davesaz wrote:I'm not the one claiming to have a high number of reads. And you don't get to reverse the question like that.
It's midnight:30 for me and past time to sleep. Maybe tomorrow.
Yes I do
You're making a bad faith argument and discouraging people from giving reads
I have given explanations for every read asked of me in good faith
So now I want your reads with explanations since you decided to take a lazy pot shot at me
VOTE: dave
pop ins to complain about impressions and reads = you can get voted
I read this and thought "that's not a way I'd usually think of Dave, what's going on..."
KM appears to have massively over reacted and I cant think to what end
The only thing I can come up with is the is a manufactured reason to move off TSE rather than for Dave
So if (now) Titus flips scum, potentially a link here imo
profil, care to respond to my allegations against u?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1233, insomnia wrote:Amrun not noticing me scum reading her 3 times now must mean she’s scared
You should be
No it’s just boring. You couldn’t have a proper scumread on me at this point even if I was scum. If you’re town, you’ll figure it out as I engage. If you’re scum, you’ll keep pushing low hanging fruit. I don’t know yet which it is.
In post 490, Nero Cain wrote:profi. Its p20 and your still voting your RVS. Wanna talk about it?
Not really. I'm going to bed
its now page 50+ Wanna talk about your reads n things now?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1332, profii wrote:I read this and thought "that's not a way I'd usually think of Dave, what's going on..."
KM appears to have massively over reacted and I cant think to what end
I actually just wanted dave to give reads which he then did but thanks for the insightful scum commentary
In post 1233, insomnia wrote:Amrun not noticing me scum reading her 3 times now must mean she’s scared
You should be
No it’s just boring. You couldn’t have a proper scumread on me at this point even if I was scum. If you’re town, you’ll figure it out as I engage. If you’re scum, you’ll keep pushing low hanging fruit. I don’t know yet which it is.
You're essentially saying I currently have reasoning to scum read you, so did you just look to shade me?
In post 1332, profii wrote:I read this and thought "that's not a way I'd usually think of Dave, what's going on..."
KM appears to have massively over reacted and I cant think to what end
I actually just wanted dave to give reads which he then did but thanks for the insightful scum commentary
Why is it scum commentary and not wrong town commentary out of curiosity?
In post 1343, profii wrote:I think it's easier to get town reads in this game than scum reads and I'm not a big share-er when it comes to those
that would make an excellent scum strategy.
and I feel the exact opposite. With 13 scum in a 50 player game I surprised @ your lack of paranoia.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.