Idk, maybe she legit thought it would actually lynch Rex?In post 1922, Nero Cain wrote:Dolly is a big pile of null but does scum make an attention-getting vote like that?
I'm still not seeing any town motivation for it though.
Idk, maybe she legit thought it would actually lynch Rex?In post 1922, Nero Cain wrote:Dolly is a big pile of null but does scum make an attention-getting vote like that?
I think that now would be a good opportunity for me to say...In post 1875, Hectic wrote:First things first, I hate Day 1. It's the worst part of the game for me and I struggle during it. It's part of my current meta to hang back during Day 1, and then really start engaging during Day 2 and on. Day 1 I've got nothing concrete to work with, so I observe more than post during it. Typically people react as you might expect, shrieking that yours truly is Scum because if it.
I mean I guess that's fair but in context it seemed like you were implying that Rex shouldn't be let off the hook just because he claimed PR. Is that what you were intending?In post 1909, Nero Cain wrote:I never said there is one. Is there a point here?
It was Flavor Leaf, so yes, I agree with youIn post 1914, Egix96 wrote:The issue is that I don't see why any sensible person would do that...
I never said N1, but this game is going to last a lot of phases. We can wait a while.In post 1916, AaronFrost wrote:What makes you so sure scum is going to kill him N1? He claimed novice, he can't get results on N1.
to get that interpretation you have to be readingIn post 1932, Something_Smart wrote:I mean I guess that's fair but in context it seemed like you were implying that Rex shouldn't be let off the hook just because he claimed PR. Is that what you were intending?
I used this exact reasoning in a newbie game when I claimed vanilla town as reason that I should not lynched. I was still lynched.In post 1930, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Do you guys think any wagoned scum would claim anything but a super duper powerful role that sounds awesome for town?
Yes. Why do you think it was unnecessary?In post 1924, Egix96 wrote:Was it really necessary to list every single instance when it should have been obvious her list was randomised just from the first three points alone?In post 1874, gobbledygook wrote:
as a matter of fact, it's fucking dumb. I'm not exactly shy when it comes to my thoughts and feelings, suggesting that I made a vague statement doesn't fit me...like at all. I had already moved my vote too. If I still wanted Rex dead I'd still be voting there and yelling that he's scum ala Titus who is still scum lol.In post 1937, Nero Cain wrote:to get that interpretation you have to be readingIn post 1932, Something_Smart wrote:I mean I guess that's fair but in context it seemed like you were implying that Rex shouldn't be let off the hook just because he claimed PR. Is that what you were intending?wayin.
but no
says the guy that's ok with letting profii do that.In post 1939, gobbledygook wrote:I don’t understand why people are content with letting slots not contributing to the game
You are objectively wrong if you think Dolly has done more than profii.In post 1942, Nero Cain wrote:says the guy that's ok with letting profii do that.In post 1939, gobbledygook wrote:I don’t understand why people are content with letting slots not contributing to the game
that was very bettlejuicy.In post 1945, profii wrote:Nero fancies me tbh
Was this sarcasm?In post 1854, Something_Smart wrote:Reaction tests are good against the person being hammered?
That's news to me.