In post 911, Menalque wrote:I replaced in without looking at the game at all. then I skimmed the first couple of pages and gave reads based on that. you know that's perfectly NAI for me because I give reads off the first couple of pages most games. I'm pretty sure you've been in games with me where I've voted scum correctly off the first couple of pages?
you have voted scum off the first couple of pages, sure. you've also voted town off the first couple of pages.
when ur actually playin the game you're also dreadful at tonereading me.
you're either misreppin cheeky because her sod1 wasn't warm fuzzy and likeable
or you're town who's meta impression of cheeky is upside fucking down
like
i prompted engagement off your vote. when u asked i even admitted i wasn't really sure about your slot and just wanted to shake u up.
i looked for a read trajectory from you
i looked for any cognisance that your meta case was just outright wrong
and i got none of it
so i think you're scum?
In post 911, Menalque wrote:I don't think this is you looking at things from a town mindset, I think this is you trying to lock in a mislynch on me
dude i'm the leading wagon here and i don't even think titus is scum anymore
allowing there's likely still a scum vote to swing my way? i think i'm a pretty probable mislynch this phase
meanwhile i'm votin u and what? like, cjv is like "hmm i'll vote menalque after ____ maybe"?
you suggesting that i'm trying to mislynch you is blatant posturing when literally all you've done since you've repped in is try to get my slot mislynched
In post 911, Menalque wrote:for instance: I don't think town!you would be trying to say I'm scum for thinking the same two people are scum that I thought from initial impressions, I think you'd be trying to make me see that I was confbiased
which goes 2 show u don't know me vry well
i'd look at what you've posted and ask my good self:
"is this an agenda (scum indicative), or is it confbias (town indicative)?"
you have the same two scumreads as liek pg. 6
ur reads aren't developping
ur reads are understated and have nearly no trajectory
but hooooboy do you want votes on good ol' mr. wooper
this isn't confirmation bias dude you are pushing an agenda because you want a lynch.
given it blatantly doesn't look like confirmation bias fmpov why would i waste time coming from an angle of "hey mena qt i think ur confbiased!!" and give you a chance to weasel out of it when i can light a fire under you and see whether you squirm?