Point taken. mar does look scum. But we cant overrule other possibilities too. gw would probably be lynched anyways if mar flipped scum.In post 1249, skitter30 wrote:like form my pov y'all made a dumb decision yesterday, which i called out at the time, and pointed out the indicators that y'all were on the wrong track, which got shot down
As far as I can see, we may be doing exactly the same we just did to gw. Everyone more or less gave their approval to the course of action against mar. It is sure convenient now to be able to claim "that was a dumb course of action, lets lynch mar now", the (to that time) second most suspicious player, and most inactive one. If we were to assume a scum actively participated on gws lynch, that would be 2 kills. Dnt misunderstand me; I completely agree that, in retrospective, mar was a better choice, and the most informative at that time.
That dsnt mean u r my most suspected scum, or only one. I agree men may have moved things towards gw. The nail on his coffin was probably due to overpressure too; nobody can force gw to act the way he did, but sure can help to. So, I do suspect somewhat dats for that too.
Now, mason has become a VT with a different name. That means the only possible use for that role is to claim and counterclaim effectively, since mafia knows who every town is. I suggest, instead of going straight to a lynch on mar, to make a list of possible suspects due to the recent events. If there is a mason in those suspects, we can immediatly rule him out of the list with his claim. If mar claims though, we lynch him, for possible fishing for a counterclaim, wich would inutilize the strategy.
I believe we dont rly want to lynch mar today. We may always lynch him tomorrow. Instead, lets search for possible suspects outside that, weighting the possibility of him being town; we can always lynch him tomorrow.