Large Normal 226 | The Legend of Zelda | Canceled

Drixx · Post Post #4350 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:21 am

Titus targeted me during the night. Sorry I'm so late to day start. Day started a few minutes after I crashed yesterday and I worked last night so I'm just now home and checking in.

I have more, but that seems like it might be important to share ASAP.

EeveeLution Army · Post Post #4351 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:22 am

I mean...you could have just outed two town prs for no reason

gobbledygook · Post Post #4352 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:23 am

In post 4351, EeveeLution Army wrote:I mean...you could have just outed two town prs for no reason

What...?

Drixx · Post Post #4353 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:26 am

In post 4108, Pine wrote:
In post 4105, gobbledygook wrote:But yes let’s kill Mubarik
Uhhh, no? Get a replacement. Odds are that slot is Town, and getting someone else in here would be a gain.

Will this be your response to any wagon on someone who has lurksacked so far?

Elsa Jay · Post Post #4354 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:30 am

In post 4328, Nero Cain wrote:Why are we so worried about inactive scum anways? They don't hurt us and can't use their abilities unless the mod lets their teammates send in actions which I think most mods do but I've seen some that don't.

Yeah, but Inactive town hurts later on because that means even more votes have to be from scum and town has less day power then they should.

I also agree with getting rid of the dead slots in all but name. Hence 98 being on the list.

If we at all out now I feel we'll lose even more players.

Drixx · Post Post #4355 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:32 am

In post 4120, Gamma Emerald wrote:Any reason Drixx isn’t being pushed more?

I mean that kind of occurred to me a little bit also. But I think I'm playing pretty firmly town here and my thought process is on display in the cases I've made. I'm catching up as I go though so maybe opportunistic scum show up later to try and push me.

Drixx · Post Post #4356 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:33 am

In post 4129, Titus wrote:
In post 4127, The Fonz wrote:OK, Titus,claim your target then?
Drixx.

Oh hey. Guess my revelation wasn't very revealing. Ho hum.

Drixx · Post Post #4357 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:35 am

In post 4136, chkflip wrote:VOTE: Titus

Sheep this and you'll be fine.

Add Chkflip to my scummy list from yesterday. All my notes say is that nearly every time they show up and post I get a scum vibe from it, so there's a place I need to look and figure out WHY, but definitely they go on the list.

Drixx · Post Post #4358 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:37 am

In post 4142, chkflip wrote:I'd rather not, given that I don't want to out the reasons I know how to read Titus and, to a lesser extent, her predecessor.

Oof this is hideous. "I'm better at you and I TOTALLY figured out scum tells for not one, but TWO players who happened to play the same slot this game, and they're SOOOO juicy I just HAVE to save them for some future game. Just TRUST me."

LOL

The Fonz · Post Post #4359 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:40 am

In post 4356, Drixx wrote:
In post 4129, Titus wrote:
In post 4127, The Fonz wrote:OK, Titus,claim your target then?
Drixx.
Oh hey. Guess my revelation wasn't very revealing. Ho hum.

We did need confirmation from you.

Drixx · Post Post #4360 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:43 am

In post 4185, Pine wrote:
In post 4179, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 4178, chkflip wrote:Should also lynch where we can find associatives but hey wtf do I know
Except those slot will NEVER generate associatives outside of a wagon
Pray tell why you (and Pine) are hell bent on avoiding this?
VOTE: ar98mubarik
Because replacements are a thing.

Are you new?

Replacements have been rolling in super fast so far ... and we're only what like ... 10 real life days since the call went out? I'm

certain

those slots will be replaced any time now.

Drixx · Post Post #4361 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:46 am

In post 4359, The Fonz wrote:
In post 4356, Drixx wrote:
In post 4129, Titus wrote:
In post 4127, The Fonz wrote:OK, Titus,claim your target then?
Drixx.
Oh hey. Guess my revelation wasn't very revealing. Ho hum.
We did need confirmation from you.

Nero = Janie.

Drixx · Post Post #4362 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:47 am

In post 4194, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 4189, Elsa Jay wrote:You guys aren't seeing it. The Neighborhoods have a higher chance of having scum, particularly the Palace where they all banded together to lynch Ranger.

98 is in that hood. I'm going with the odds that of the 6 left there's 1 or 2 scum there. So 1/6 or 1/3. I like those odds.
This makes sense if 98 was active an actively pushing the hood. Wouldn't by your own admission scum be more likely to be among those who actually did push BR from that Hood?

The only actives in the hood all posted in the thread yesterday, and were all in pretty organic looking agreement about the slip. To be clear: Insomina, TheFonz and myself.

Nero Cain · Post Post #4363 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:51 am

are you fakeclaiming a guilty on me?

The Fonz · Post Post #4364 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:00 am

Yeah. His posting just didn't make any sense coming from town.

Drixx · Post Post #4365 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:01 am

In post 4208, Nero Cain wrote:I actually don't hate #'s. He's null. I mean I guess you could argue that he
IS
scum by being so null and under the radar.

Psyche was null and useless but I just kinda disliked everything that Kage posted.

insomnia I didn't really like how he handled TSE. Like that whole "I don't want to vote TSE b/c he's funny." and using something that has 0 to do with the game seems like scum reasoning to me. OFC he does eventually vote TSE but eh...

Pine was a
MAJOR
lurksack and I think that in of itself is scummy. Dunno why he's been active today and his last few posts are kinda
LAMIST
.

Honestly? Drixx needs to go at this point. He fakeclaimed as vig to get tic tac lynched, he fakeclaimed to get BR lynched. His day 1 fakeclaim is scummier than his d2 fakeclaim b/c CCing a vig claim d1 means he has to believe that there were no other vigs and thats just way too stupid for an experienced player.

I'm not really sure why Fonz claimed d2 and his whine about how I'm bound to git scum just b/c I have more than 2 scumreads still doesn't sit right with me.

I'd lynch Drixx first and then its a toss-up between Fonz and insomnia. But watch it be Pine. lol

This is incredibly slimy. Anyone who was there at the end of day one will remember there was a rush of vig claims starting with BR. There's no world where my claim (and subsequent snarky posts about it) got tictac lynched. Nero is all kinds of scummy this game.

And ... Janie has a gun.

Drixx · Post Post #4366 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:02 am

In post 4363, Nero Cain wrote:are you fakeclaiming a guilty on me?

I have a gun and I'm town. Tictac and BR had guns, and they were town. Why you jumping straight to guilty?

Nero Cain · Post Post #4367 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:05 am

I have a role that wouldn't have a gun so therefore you must be fakeclaiming again. I'll take that 1v1 any day.

VOTE: Drixx

Nero Cain · Post Post #4368 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:08 am

In post 4365, Drixx wrote:There's no world where my claim (and subsequent snarky posts about it) got tictac lynched.

in fairness, it was towards the EOD and it likely didn't matter that much but you hard CCed him. Like if you want to argue that it wasn't the reason he got lynched fine but that's being nit-picky.

Drixx · Post Post #4369 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:09 am

In post 4263, Nero Cain wrote:Also it's just funny that you claim Drixx is leading when all he's done is fakeclaim to get our vigs lynched.

Leading as town isn't (and really cannot be outside of shoot the moon situations) about being 100% right. Other people saw BR's post in real time and concluded it was a slip BEFORE I read it. I viewed it as a slip when I read it but before I read others posting about it. The game thread at large got the exact words that were said and also came to that conclusion.

And then there's KM who I was absolutely correct about. Tictac was never my push and I've already pointed out why you're scummy for suggesting I am somehow primarily responsible for them being lynched.

You make these terrible assertions and then whinge about why people can't tell you're "town" ... maybe don't say stupid shit that makes no rational sense?

Drixx · Post Post #4370 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:10 am

In post 4368, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 4365, Drixx wrote:There's no world where my claim (and subsequent snarky posts about it) got tictac lynched.
in fairness, it was towards the EOD and it likely didn't matter that much but you hard CCed him. Like if you want to argue that it wasn't the reason he got lynched fine but that's being nit-picky.

Umm... no it's not. You're quoted a post or two above this trying to suggest that I'm primarily responsible for it. And that I've done naught else.

Nero Cain · Post Post #4371 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:11 am

In post 4366, Drixx wrote:Why you jumping straight to guilty?

I know my role. If you are claiming that I have a gun and I don't then the logical conclusion is that you are lying.

Drixx · Post Post #4372 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:11 am

In post 4366, Drixx wrote:
In post 4363, Nero Cain wrote:are you fakeclaiming a guilty on me?
I have a gun and I'm town. Tictac and BR had guns, and they were town. Why you jumping straight to guilty?

I see you didn't respond to this. Selective response is a bad sign. Just look at KM, for a very relevant example.

Nero Cain · Post Post #4373 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:14 am

In post 4369, Drixx wrote:maybe don't say stupid shit that makes no rational sense?

Did you or did you not CC Tic Tacs vig claim? Did you or did you not CC Br's vig claim and then backtrack and claim joat?

You whined when KM was calling you scum. Yre such a baby as scum.

Nero Cain · Post Post #4374 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:15 am

In post 4372, Drixx wrote:
In post 4366, Drixx wrote:
In post 4363, Nero Cain wrote:are you fakeclaiming a guilty on me?
I have a gun and I'm town. Tictac and BR had guns, and they were town. Why you jumping straight to guilty?
I see you didn't respond to this. Selective response is a bad sign. Just look at KM, for a very relevant example.

Look, a scum tactic! "you didn't respond to this!" (when I clearly have.