In post 4872, Titus wrote:Drixx is town. I bet 98 and Creature are scum. My wagon picking up after I push them as alternatives is hardly a coincidence.
Cool. Let's lynch ar98mubarik and put Nero on ignore (internally).
Although: possibly the last time today: @ Nero - its'
KM's actions towards ar98, not the other way,
that are scummy. KM pays the slot a weirdly large amount of attention for someone who has literally never posted.
Specifically, Elsa votes ar98, KM questions Elsa for it, then does a quick 180 and votes the slot. As if he's caught in two minds about whether to bus.
seems fairly flimsy and I don't remember that being the original reasoning for the wagon on ar today.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
my Titus case but the reasons as being ignored b/c she "resolves"
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 4867, The Fonz wrote:We started on mubarik specifically because there were weird Kirari associatives.
So I dunno where this convo took place.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
That's not being dishonest. :/ I didn't even remember that post hence why I asked where that convo took place and attributed aly to starting the AR wagon. Also, I never cited that post.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 4885, Nero Cain wrote:That's not being dishonest. :/ I didn't even remember that post hence why I asked where that convo took place and attributed aly to starting the AR wagon. Also, I never cited that post.
Right, but at best that's a lack of town motive, and jumping to insinuate things about other players who were being entirely truthful.
In post 4886, The Fonz wrote:Right, but at best that's a lack of town motive, and jumping to insinuate things about other players who were being entirely truthful.
yes, b/c only town remember everything that happened.
I mean, yes, I do think you are scum but that but I literally asked a question about where that was from b/c I didn't remember it. I didn't "insinuate things". You are being a little overdefensive.
go back to the blue scum PT.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Can Elsa like lynch both neighborhoods and call it a day, plus arsonist is in game, norwegianboy claimed vigi when he was a bus driver, Dolly was again linked to the deaths on night one and ultimate plank / he was probably sleeping in a supermarket during the quarantine so he got zapped by motion sensors, who can be trusted now because it's already day 3 and the minority will perpetuate chaos so everyone should stay calm and play their role, I know that I'm town and I can be trusted. So just lynch both neighborhoods with Elsa who asked to be protected to be the lone survivor
When bus driver swaps with bus driver and gets role-blocked? Did anyone take action on NorwegianboyEE who was quite popular in his time
In post 4890, QuantumQuasar wrote:
When bus driver swaps with bus driver and gets role-blocked? Did anyone take action on NorwegianboyEE who was quite popular in his time
Why are you bringing this up? Apart from my struggling to follow it, any form of action redirection is explicitly non-normal.
In post 4890, QuantumQuasar wrote:
When bus driver swaps with bus driver and gets role-blocked? Did anyone take action on NorwegianboyEE who was quite popular in his time
Why are you bringing this up? Apart from my struggling to follow it, any form of action redirection is explicitly non-normal.
It's some form of townie witchcraft but without the power ability of switching the position and the targets stay static, I mean whoever else is bus driver just claim even if you're not supposed to role claim because that's a lack of etiquette so instead of neighborhoods can we make a bus stop on elsa because I'll be waiting there for a two-decker bus before night 4. Thanks
Also that bunch of hoodlums that made fun of Black Ranger you're all suspect plus whoever bandwagoned again by boredom, is there an option to skip day instead of random lynching as a majority because as a majority if we can organize ourselves then who will by reading through a dime a dozen players, I follow the opinion of alyssa of just randoming vigi at this point anyone who is just bandwagoning out of boredom but this isn't meant to be a bingo salon
In post 331, Nero Cain wrote:so lets save the mod a replace and lynch a scummy slot with a useless role?
first post is LAMIST and the 2nd post is incriminating, in the context of following the first. Just quoting so i can find it later
When did people start using LAMIST? I feel like a proud dad or something.
Also that #311 by Nero Cain smells bad.
In post 447, Drixx wrote:So ... in a neighborhood with {redacted} but Black Ranger is in there. He did the whole "Look at how super helpful I am being" entrance combined with the "you know there's totally scum in this neighborhood ... you REALIZE that right?" thing. For as long as I've been on this site, and probably before that, those two behaviors in a neighborhood have been super scum indicative.
So I pushed him and threw some snark at him to provoke an emotional response. He flunked on the reactions.
Then {redacted} hopped in and baited Black Ranger into another pretty bad couple posts.
So yeah... BR is probably also scum. That said ... KM's response to being asked to explain scum leans was bad enough to solidify them as top scum. They win the prize of getting lynched today.
Nero, BBmolla, AF, A50, davesaz, EJ and S_S ... join me plx. Thx.
so how is drixx not suspect again because the attention was diverted from him earlier?