I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 54, Hiraki wrote:Perhaps later. Just throwing some bait in the water. I could just not enjoy your posting style either which will make things difficult.
Could be. Hit me up anytime if you wanna jam.
In post 53, Luca Blight wrote:This is a blitz game. If you don’t like something then fire away.
Luca, you got anything you want to fire at?
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 58, Luca Blight wrote:Yes, you were very obviously Town that game from early on. Not sure if it was just that game? I’ll have a look back.
remeber the game before where we were TvT and screamed at each other for 100 pages before you quickhammered me? good times.
In post 59, Luca Blight wrote:You’ve been active so far but your play has been stilted by comparison.
Your convo about the meta seemed a bit aimless
it feels aimless because i personally think that "researching meta" is not exactly an AI thing. i was hoping sparking conversation about it would lead to discussion that *would* be AI, but i guess not.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 62, Datisi wrote:remeber the game before where we were TvT and screamed at each other for 100 pages before you quickhammered me? good times.
Yeah, I think I just don't like your style, which is fine.
Perfectly fine with my vote atm. This conversation seems more than forced and really dumb. I don't get how a conversation that has nothing to do with the game will help you figure out something that has to do with the game when you don't even have a good grasp of Datasi's meta after 3 pages. And Datasi has the most posts in this game by far without me checking.
In post 60, Hiraki wrote:What's the point of this conversation? Are you going to SR him or something?
How do you usually decide if you SR someone or not? You don't talk to them?
pedit: ahh i see.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 26, Datisi wrote:Have you researched others in the game (other than Luca)?
yes, i researched the player list, though some more extensively than others.
You and I are going to get along great.
In post 32, HoldenGolden wrote:Fair enough. I would be more alarmed if you said a more recent time-frame
This is suspicious to me. Why would he state a more recent time if it doesn't exist?
You are correct that there is no more recent games from me.
However the question was when he acquainted himself with my games. Aka, I was testing to see if it was actually a legit reason from him which I think so since he gave a more precise and believable time
I see. But why does the timeframe matter if he had a reason for looking at the game either way? If he said he reviewed the game for research in a more recent game, would you find it suspicious?
It has nothing to do with the reason to meta me. Allow me to expand further
*Put on your big brain hats, takes a deep breath*
As you can see at the top of this page there was a span of 2 minutes between me posing the question and his answer. This is important as here are two examples of the answers I am expecting:
"It was back when you were playing"
vs
"I read 1944 for newbie 1952"
If I am gauging if he was being artificial about his view on me, then one of these clearly sounds more scummy then the other. The former is open ended, vague, and easily bullshitable. The other meanwhile is precise and narrow scoped. Factor in the short time frame in the response to the question and with it being more what I expect if he was being truthful, then I am left with a pretty easy conclusion. Yes, this is assuming that 2 mins is not enough time to make the response to it, but that's the philosophical razor for you
Now a question of my own: What do you make of it now given my rational? Ball is back in your court
I like your reasoning, but neither of those answers is a more recent time frame. You stated that you would be alarmed if he had given a more recent time frame. What would that have looked like?
Ah I see the confusion now; I would be alarmed in that case for similar reasons. Datisi really has no real reason inbetween 1 month into my hiatus to a month before it ended (remember it was "awhile ago", not two nights ago) to randomly decide "hey remember HoldenGolden? I am going to read up on his meta for no reason!"
Therefore unless it was a very good reason why, I would instantly found anything of the sort scummy asf because it would be bullshit.
In post 60, Hiraki wrote:What's the point of this conversation? Are you going to SR him or something?
Whats the point of withholding the discussion about your pings on Datisi?
EDIT: are you now thinking its because your style's dont mix well or is there more behind your view on Datisi?
luca stands out as townish to me; his tone feels different to that newbie game where i was masons with clidd and he was scum
@hiraki id really like to hear your thoughts on datisi. withholding ai content like this only hurts town unless you're doing some weird galaxy brain gambit
pedit: madoka whats up with the colors
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 68, bugspray wrote:@hiraki id really like to hear your thoughts on datisi. withholding ai content like this only hurts town unless you're doing some weird galaxy brain gambit
s'there a point to asking this? multiple others asked, and he already commented it could be a style clash.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 68, bugspray wrote:@hiraki id really like to hear your thoughts on datisi. withholding ai content like this only hurts town unless you're doing some weird galaxy brain gambit
s'there a point to asking this? multiple others asked, and he already commented it could be a style clash.
i think so, yeah
even if it's a style clash chances are it will drive the game forward with some more ai content to end this bout of "apathy"
pedit: no, madoka but it seems like you're definitely trying to convey some meaning and i'm bad at figuring that stuff out
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 62, Datisi wrote:remeber the game before where we were TvT and screamed at each other for 100 pages before you quickhammered me? good times.
Yeah, I think I just don't like your style, which is fine.
Perfectly fine with my vote atm. This conversation seems more than forced and really dumb. I don't get how a conversation that has nothing to do with the game will help you figure out something that has to do with the game when you don't even have a good grasp of Datasi's meta after 3 pages. And Datasi has the most posts in this game by far without me checking.
Content leads to more content. Simple as that, really.
Not sure what Datisi’s post count has to do with anything.
