In post 502, Datisi wrote: In post 374, HoldenGolden wrote:As an extension, I will go further to say I do not think that anything that Bug's has posted is townie from logic based perspective.
All of their posts have either left me confused or did not satisfy my curiosity such as when I asked them to provide more credible logic in regards to their reads.
Rather, I think he is town based on observations I see from what they are posting.
you mean this?
ah ok i think i see what you mean.
ye, i guess we'll have to agree to disagree. it doesn't make "sense" as scum to do that. but if you're assuming that scum is always doing optimal/stellar plays is gonna lose you some town games. i've seen scum win games that they had virtually no chance of winning because scum did things that were blatantly shooting themself in the foot fpr the town to go "why would they do that if they're scum??? must be town." and those were intentional plays. players sometimes make bad moves regardless.
I know, but I think with other points I raised it's more likely to come from town but its w/e. It is agree to disagree. I dont see it ever changing much given bugs posts after my WoT.
In any case, bugs must die before we are/if placed into a mylo or lylo situation due to the ambiguity of the slot much like antitown players in general. Could easily be wrong and they are scum which cool.
Annoying but I dont really see an alternative.
-------
As a side note since you are on the other side of the fence, how did you interrupt Lucas last post there? I still bugs me that he raises the meta point just to dismiss the context of it, but I admit I may be bias in reading it given my views on bugs
